Originally posted by Walexhris
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Woodley Slams Critics: Jake Paul Would Literally F--- A lot of Y'all Up!
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by lion33lit View PostJake is in a great position to make loads & loads of big money. He might be ready to give a lot of pro boxers all that they can handle, but of course naysayers will always see it “no way!” Jake now creates that emotional fan friendly juxtaposition that’ll keep his pockets obese fat.
Woodley just needs to ignore the jokes. 99% of those clowns would never get in the ring (to actually try and win) with a guy that has the luxury and dedication to train all day every day - with the opportunity of utilizing any pro-trainer on the planet.
Why wouldn’t a c-ocky athletic, young, crafty YouTuber NOT be able to understand pro-boxing with its ins and outs?!? A very experienced guy can kick his ass, but he can literally buy time until he’s ready to test himself against a hospital visit.
Jakes money could’ve gotten Emmanuel Steward if he was alive today.…Emmanuel would’ve gladly taken on the project, and not just for the money…..This YouTubing thing is the real deal, it can help turn you into a millionaire just by showcasing your pet frog, or bahtty boy make up tips….or anything bored individuals finally feel the need to be interested in….Last edited by Haka; 01-25-2022, 12:51 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by jonnyc420 View Post
Of course, but the casuals never stick do they? Certainly what is not helping is having washed up NBA and NFL players box on an undercard of am already garbage card and furthering the narritive that boxing is now a circus. Where exactly is this helping the sport? That is the point.Oldskoolg likes this.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by Walexhris View Post
Well...the very idea of two grown punching themselves in the face, for the entertainment of a crowd could be described as a circus. My point is that it makes sense for as long as the numbers Continue to validate the act
Comment
-
Comment