Treat the WBC like we did the WBA

[PeepeePoopooMan]

Agreed.

But why stop there? Go after Paco Valcarcel and the WBO too. We've known for a while that they do the bidding of Bob Arum, moving his fighters up the rankings and calling for mandatories when it benefits Top Rank. They're cozy with Frank Warren too.

If we're going to clean house then let's do it right.

Yeah! Get that *** first!

That's what you meant right?

[ShoulderRoll]

Yeah! Get that *** first!

That's what you meant right?

Is Frank Warren a ***?

I agreed with getting the WBC first, actually. And what does ******* have to do with people being corrupt pieces of sh-t?

Get out of here with your race baiting,

[PeepeePoopooMan]

Is Frank Warren a ***?

I agreed with getting the WBC first, actually. And what does ******* have to do with people being corrupt pieces of sh-t?

Get out of here with your race baiting,

Oh yeah my bad.

Get dem white devils!

You definitely haven't nor ever been race driven. I apologize.

[WBC WBA IBF]

If the entirety of boxing history means anything to you then bridgerweight is an unwelcome disruption of it.

It's not a disruption at all. It's just Super Cruiserweight under a cute name, with anybody weighing under the Super Cruiserweight limit still allowed to compete at heavyweight if they want to.

It's the first weight class they've added since Super Middleweight in 1990. It's not a big deal. Just makes things more fair for smaller heavyweights who don't want to give up 60 pounds. Many of whom are very talented fighters who would welcome the opportunity to compete against guys their own size.

[ShoulderRoll]

Oh yeah my bad.

Get dem white devils!

You definitely haven't nor ever been race driven. I apologize.

I was glad they got the WBA and agreed that they should go after the WBC. Are Gilberto Mendoza and Mauricio Sulaiman white devils? Or ***ish?

Try again, troll.

[ShoulderRoll]

It's not a disruption at all. It's just Super Cruiserweight under a cute name, with anybody weighing under the Super Cruiserweight limit still allowed to compete at heavyweight if they want to.

It's the first weight class they've added since Super Middleweight in 1990. It's not a big deal. Just makes things more fair for smaller heavyweights who don't want to give up 60 pounds. Many of whom are very talented fighters who would welcome the opportunity to compete against guys their own size.

Well, I couldn't disagree more. Usyk and Holyfield and Mike Tyson have shown that there is no need for brdgerweight.

If people want to make changes to favor smaller heavyweights then just bring back 15-round title fights.

[Toffee]

Usyk didn't win the WBC belt, which is the hardest one to win. The WBC heavyweight champion has never lost a unification fight in the entirety of boxing history.

Load of rubbish.

It's the fighter, not the belt.

Wilder won it from Stiverne. Hardest to win?

[WBC WBA IBF]

Well, I couldn't disagree more. Usyk and Holyfield and Mike Tyson have shown that there is no need for brdgerweight.

They haven't shown that at all. Usyk has never won the WBC heavyweight title and is completely irrelevant. Just because he beat Joshua doesn't mean he wouldn't get destroyed by Fury. Joshua was never good enough to win the WBC heavyweight title either.

Mike Tyson knew he had NO CHANCE against WBC mandatory Lennox Lewis, because he was too big and too skilled, so Tyson vacated the WBC heavyweight title.

Holyfield bulked up using tons of illegal steroids to have success at heavyweight, which lead to heart problems. Even with all of the steroids, he still couldn't handle the size of Lennox Lewis and Fury is even bigger than that.

Even if once and a while there are smaller heavyweights who can compete with the WBC's biggest and baddest, you're forgetting about all of the fighters who stood no chance whatsoever and were never allowed to compete against guys their own size like everyone else gets to do.

[WBC WBA IBF]

Load of rubbish.

It's a fact. The WBC is undefeated in heavyweight unifications.

It's the fighter, not the belt.

But the WBC has, by far, the strongest list of heavyweight champions.

Wilder won it from Stiverne. Hardest to win?

UK fanboys have decided to go back in time and pretend Stiverne wasn't a top opponent, but the truth is that he was regarded as the #2 heavyweight in the world at the time.

[Toffee]

It's a fact. The WBC is undefeated in heavyweight unifications.

It's a pointless fact. I can think of Lewis and Tyson (neither of whom are a good example of the the belt being the hardest to win).

It barely happens, and it's nothing to do with an elevated status of the WBC Champion.