Comments Thread For: Joe Smith Prioritizes Beterbiev Or Bivol Unification Over Shot At Canelo: 'It's For My Legacy'

[TreyShaw]

If Canelo fights Smith. That would be one of the most ballsy moves, probably the ballsiest move of his career. You won't see me changing my tune when the fight is announced. You should give Smith credit too if he fights Betebiev.

Yea sure we all know how that tune will change quickly it always does after canelo beats these guys.

[rrayvez]

No I actually enjoy this.

BUT what is it are you discrediting Oscar or not now???? Lol

Again no of that changes the fact that charlo ducked canelo.

I always think Oscar is full of sh111t. And by your logic, if Charlo ducked canelo then canelo also ducked charlo because he declined an offer as well and at least we have specifics of what that offer entailed. Now I didn’t say canelo ducked Charlo. I just disagreed with the other guy who claimed nobody wanted a Canelo vs charlo fight and disagreed with him saying that this article is saying smith is ducking Canelo. Dude doesn’t even have an offer and unlike lesser threats in Callum smith and Saunders and plant, bivol
And beterbiev are serious threats.

[Blond Beast]

I like Joe but I’m a bit surprised at the fans desire for him to fight Canelo. He’s a tough guy for sure and his punches are truly hard. The more Canelo wins the more he’s due to get caught with something is one way to look at it. Still Canelo has such good defence and counters that all of these opponents outputs and connect percentages will go down. Throwing less and landing less often is a hard road to victory. I’d love to see Joe fight Beterbiev. Artur isn’t young. He pushes hard but he has flaws. I did like him instinctively throwing the left downstairs in his combos in his last fight.

[-Kev-]

Why do fans feel the need to just make stuff up? It just makes you look crazy and you lose all credibility for being so dishonest. Dishonesty is not the proper way to discuss and debate. It literally leads nowhere good. Just ends up making everyone involved look ******.

Imagine I said this:

“Oleksandr Usyk left CW because he knew Canelo was coming up to CW one day so he ran away.”

You see that nonsense I just said? Those lies? What does that do? How can you debate that? It would not even matter if I got a comment from Usyk saying he wants the fight too. Anyone who said that would immediately expose themselves as a completely unreasonable person. Reasoning would not be an option for someone so far gone.

How can you have so many facts, from both sides, confirming the fight was turned down, but still argue against the facts? Serious question, where exactly is that debate going? How the fck can you argue with someone who is saying 2+2=3?

[-Kev-]

No I actually enjoy this.

BUT what is it are you discrediting Oscar or not now???? Lol

Again no of that changes the fact that charlo ducked canelo.

You are not going anywhere with debating him. You are attempting to debate him with facts, while he is debating with dishonesty, opinions and lies.

If Canelo beat Charlo, that poster would have just been part of a group saying Canelo cherrypicked Charlo and ducked Adonis Stevenson. Or some random ass BS like that.

Good luck.

[rrayvez]

You are not going anywhere with debating him. You are attempting to debate him with facts, while he is debating with dishonesty, opinions and lies.

If Canelo beat Charlo, that poster would have just been part of a group saying Canelo cherrypicked Charlo and ducked Adonis Stevenson. Or some random ass BS like that.

Good luck.

you’ve already proven to have poor reading comprehension, now you’ve proven to not know what facts are. The fact is, joe smith never got an offer to face canelo so it can’t be a duck (which is your inaccurate opinion) as you’re desperately trying to prove it is, the fact is not once did I say canelo ducked charlo yet you accused me of that and got emotional about it, the fact is I proved canelo did get an offer to fight charlo late last year. The fact is you quit responding because you’re not intelligent enough to keep up. The fact is, everything in bold is you stating opinions. Hold the L.

[steeve steel]

Fighters want their names to be known after they're retired or dead. That's why they talk about "legacy" or "making history". It's simple human nature.

It's also human nature to be delusional...

[landotter]

At least he's talking about the unification fights. I can respect that.