Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Are past wws overrated? Or do they expose how unbalanced, devoid of big fights ww boxing has become?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    Originally posted by kushking View Post

    You are just a dumb ass clown that thinks its edgy to try finding a mistake someone made by accident,then you keep repeating it over & over like a absolute bell end wanker.(as they say in the Uk to whiny minges like you)

    Nobody cares what sht for brains like you thinks about Pac v Ugas, compubox just proved my pt which you can't refute,so you yet again lash out & resort to bs claims you can't back up (just because a few tossers like you don't like the facts I lay down, tough sht, jog on fangimp

    (& you are the definition of a Crawford fangimp you lying pos,I have gotten in tons of ****** arguments with your fanboi ass about Crawford before,you keep coming back for more,you soyboys love the taste of boots bearing down or you wouldn't be on every 1 of my threads.
    Thanks for the psychiatric evaluation but I give no credit to the opinion of a moron.

    Compubox? Really, no really!

    Let’s make one thing absolutely clear, you and I have NEVER, not once EVER, had any discussions or arguments about Terrance Crawford. It simply never happened. And that makes you an idiot or a liar or both. I’m mildly interested, which is it?

    Comment


    • #22
      Originally posted by kushking View Post

      Ps only a true clown would think I have a picture of Carr on my profile pic,but didn't know that he never fought Pea
      You boxing IQ is so low, it’s very hard to tell what you know. But I know exactly what you posted.........

      Comment


      • #23
        Originally posted by kushking View Post

        You are just a dumb ass clown that thinks its edgy to try finding a mistake someone made by accident,then you keep repeating it over & over like a absolute bell end wanker.(as they say in the Uk to whiny minges like you)

        Nobody cares what sht for brains like you thinks about Pac v Ugas, compubox just proved my pt which you can't refute,so you yet again lash out & resort to bs claims you can't back up (just because a few tossers like you don't like the facts I lay down, tough sht, jog on fangimp

        (& you are the definition of a Crawford fangimp you lying pos,I have gotten in tons of ****** arguments with your fanboi ass about Crawford before,you keep coming back for more,you soyboys love the taste of boots bearing down or you wouldn't be on every 1 of my threads.
        Compubox is not a fact, they miss and always count anything that throws the house fighter. If what you're seeing is not enough for you to make an accurate assessment. You shouldn't be comenting. If you think pac deserves a draw, just because he threw 1000 punches, not a good judge. Counts what it lands.

        Comment


        • #24
          Originally posted by BendOver View Post

          Compubox is not a fact, they miss and always count anything that throws the house fighter. If what you're seeing is not enough for you to make an accurate assessment. You shouldn't be comenting. If you think pac deserves a draw, just because he threw 1000 punches, not a good judge. Counts what it lands.
          as usual its irritating how many on here just regurgitate the same played out arguments,I literally said compubox is inaccurate,which is literally my point I made in bringing it up.

          My pt was Pac was outlanded by an average of 1.6 punches per rd,but he out threw Ugas by a 2-1 margin,& averaged 32 punches thrown per rd more.

          That proves how close a fight it was,& proves that if compubox did what they usually do when someone throws that many punches,which is undercount some of those extra 32 punches a rd Pac threw,then it is in no way a 1 sided fight in any way shape or form as tards like that clown I was responding to claims.

          And it shows Ugas fought like a complete btch
          Last edited by kushking; 01-03-2022, 10:27 PM.

          Comment


          • #25
            Originally posted by kushking View Post

            as usual its irritating how many on here just regurgitate the same played out arguments,I literally said compubox is inaccurate,which is literally my point I made in bringing it up.

            My pt was Pac was outlanded by an average of 1.6 punches per rd,but he out threw Ugas by a 2-1 margin,& averaged 32 punches thrown per rd more.

            That proves how close a fight it was,& proves that if compubox did what they usually do when someone throws that many punches,which is undercount some of those extra 32 punches a rd Pac threw,then it is in no way a 1 sided fight in any way shape or form as tards like that clown I was responding to claims.

            And it shows Ugas fought like a complete btch
            Again, the fight wasn't close. And you're the one contradicting yourself. For one we agreed compubox is not accurate, at all, then you coming out with numbers provided by, compubox, proving that the fight was close.

            Comment

            Working...
            X
            TOP