Tito beat Sweat Pea,Oba Carr knocked down prime Tito early,while Quartey was imho robbed v DLH,DLH has an argument that he beat Tito(even though I disagree strongly),& was in very close fight v Floyd. You had guys like Randall who beat JCC albeit a old JCC. You had Sweat Pea who never officially beat anyone elite at ww,Mcgirt was his best win,yet hes an ATG(JCC aside)
It just amazes me to think how stacked ww used to be,& how much everyone fought each other back then,with all kinds of triangle theories becoming worthless regularly.
So my question is, imagine Spence,Ugas,Bud,Ortiz,Boots were around back then, would any of them even be champs,or would the likes of Oba Carr,Sweat Pea,& Quartey have beat them?
Just writing this makes me sick to my stomach that the wws of today don't fight each other & guys like Bud had to be forced into fighting Porter at the end of boths prime.
Would todays fighters be called bums if they had losses like Whitaker, robberies like DLH v Quartey,KD in 2nd rd like prime Tito v Carr?
It just amazes me to think how stacked ww used to be,& how much everyone fought each other back then,with all kinds of triangle theories becoming worthless regularly.
So my question is, imagine Spence,Ugas,Bud,Ortiz,Boots were around back then, would any of them even be champs,or would the likes of Oba Carr,Sweat Pea,& Quartey have beat them?
Just writing this makes me sick to my stomach that the wws of today don't fight each other & guys like Bud had to be forced into fighting Porter at the end of boths prime.
Would todays fighters be called bums if they had losses like Whitaker, robberies like DLH v Quartey,KD in 2nd rd like prime Tito v Carr?
Comment