Cotto, Santos Promise Puerto Rico Power in November

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • boricuarn
    Contender
    • Feb 2008
    • 345
    • 16
    • 0
    • 6,606

    #101
    COTTO WILL KO PACQUIAO IN 6-8 ROUNDS. COTTO IS BETER THAN MOSLEY, ALREAD PROVED BY WINNING BY UNANIMOUS DECISION. MARGACHEATTA JUST GET READY WHEN YOU FINISHED YOUR SUSPENSSION FOR CHEATING WITH LOADING GLOVES. GAYWEATHER KEEP WATCHING TV, ENJOY BARS AND MONEY BECAUSE SHE IS SO AFRAID TO FIGHT A REAL MAN, GAYWEATHER IS A COMPLETELY SCARY GIRL.

    Comment

    • TOBYLEE1
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Mar 2009
      • 6824
      • 181
      • 49
      • 14,831

      #102
      Originally posted by jrosales13
      What other elements besides traces of sulfer and phosphate did they find? I read the report. That was the only 2 elements on the wraps. And, you need more to make plaster. They suspended him, cuz he for a fact tried to use wraps that had traces of sulfer and phosphate. There should be no reason for sulfer and phosphate to be on his wraps. It's against the rules. That is why he was rightfully suspended.

      I agree that we will never know how much damage both fighters endured in the fight. And, yes Margarito is guilty for being dumb and hanging with the wrong crowd. I don't like that he still hangs out with Capatillo but again that is not proof that he used it against Cotto. The only thing that could suggest is that he knew what Capatillo was doing going into the Mosley bout.
      The other stuff the found was attributed to some lotion they applied on his hands prior to the wrapping. These guys went in front of the panel and the evidence was reviewed. Trust me they make no mistakes, the CSAC don't want to get sued or lose credibility on a knee jerk reaction. This is no witch hunt. I was a big Margo fan but this BS has made me bitter against him, sad to say that I will still watch him if he fights again

      Comment

      • BERNIE'S CORNER
        Undisputed Champ
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Jun 2009
        • 4151
        • 292
        • 227
        • 107,684

        #103
        Originally posted by prsi
        I agree with you that there's no hard evidence against Margarito in the Cotto fight and that most of our opinions are biased by the look of Cotto's face but there's some questions that have not been answer properly.

        Why would Margarito try to use the wraps on a fight that he was expected to win (Favorite against Mosley) and not use the wraps on a fight he was expected to lose (nonfavorite against Cotto)??

        Didn't Capetillo himself said that the "blood stained wraps" that were found on Mosley was a slight mistake because they were leftovers from the Cotto's fight and he didn't knew how they were still in his bag??? During the hearing in the CSAC this questioned was asked, but it was dismissed because in was not relevant for the hearing and the outcome of their fight (Mosley -Margarito) and the Cotto-Margarito was not under their Jurisdiction being that the fight took place in NY.

        If Margarito claims "he didn't know what Capetillo had put in his hands for Mosley" how can he be certain that it was not put in his hand for Cotto???
        Although that excuse of not knowing what Capetillo put in his hands is kind of unbeleiveable (in my opinion a lie), because you get your hands wrapped right in front of you. This brings me to my next question, ****m was able to notice the platser because of how hard the wraps were just by touching and feeling them, without the experience of seeing day in and day out, how Capetillo wraps Margos hands, How is it possible that Margarito himself didn't notice, being Capetillo the only person that has been taking care of his hands for his whole career???

        At the end of the day you are correct there is no hard evidence or proof and probably we will never know until somebody (Margarito or Capetillo) speaks up. Something that will never happen because it would mean the end of their careers and a possibility of them being sued.

        But the fact is that there is more doubts suggesting that it was a not a clean victory, than certainty that it was.

        PRSI, I must say I appreciate some of your posts and you have even brought out some interesting facts that I'VE not taken into consideration when having this dialogue with others. In the third paragraph of this post you state and I quote " the Cotto- Margarito was not under their Juristiction being that the fight took place in NEW YORK. I'm not sure if your confused or you just mispoke. Cotto/ Margarito took place in Las Vegas Nev. and Mosley/ Margarito/ took place at Staples Center, Los Angeles. Just sending you a heads up brother.

        Comment

        • prsi
          Interim Champion
          Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
          • Jul 2008
          • 971
          • 81
          • 0
          • 7,246

          #104
          Originally posted by BERNIE'S CORNER
          PRSI, I must say I appreciate some of your posts and you have even brought out some interesting facts that I'VE not taken into consideration when having this dialogue with others. In the third paragraph of this post you state and I quote " the Cotto- Margarito was not under their Juristiction being that the fight took place in NEW YORK. I'm not sure if your confused or you just mispoke. Cotto/ Margarito took place in Las Vegas Nev. and Mosley/ Margarito/ took place at Staples Center, Los Angeles. Just sending you a heads up brother.
          You are totally correct my friend and thanks for correcting me. It was in Nevada not in New York.

          Thanks you for the correction one again.

          Comment

          Working...
          TOP