Froch and Beterbiev have some similar traits but Froch didn’t have the technical skills of Beterbiev. He didn’t have the same sort of crushing power too. Beterbiev is pretty much an all around better fighter.
Look at the difference between Froch-Dirrell and Beterbiev-Browne last night for example.
Froch and Beterbiev have some similar traits but Froch didn’t have the technical skills of Beterbiev. He didn’t have the same sort of crushing power too. Beterbiev is pretty much an all around better fighter.
Look at the difference between Froch-Dirrell and Beterbiev-Browne last night for example.
Beterbiev throws these short crushing shots by the book
well trained in the Soviet school of boxing
fav part about these Soviet fighters is their clean technique
I hate to use triangle theories but surely a better example would be to look at would be to look at what Froch did to a peak Pascal at his best weight then look what a shot Pascal did to Browne but I guess that wouldn't suit the narrative of Beterbiev supposedly being better than Froch.
I hate to use triangle theories but surely a better example to look at would be to look at what Froch did to a peak Pascal at his best weight then look what a shot Pascal did to Browne but I guess that wouldn't suit the narrative of Beterbiev supposedly being better than Froch.
Froch Pascal was a close competitive fight. Browne was boxing the **** out of Pascal and he was juiced up on PEDS so really that fight shouldn't count. He had fake PED power that fight.
Comment