Prime duran vs loma? How do you think it would go?
Collapse
-
-
Of this garbage?
Everyone knows Loma beat Salido. One judge sure as hell thought he did. Anyway, my only takeaway from what you said is that it's easier now to have much higher quality competition because of the number of champions available. In other words, Duran fought a lot of bums.
And you're right. Loma doesn't make Duran say "NO MAS." Loma makes Duran say "NO MASCHENKO."
Comment
-
What do you mean do I believe this? Those are the real numbers. I'm not making it up. You can check for yourself.
I'll put it to you this way, since we are focusing on the lightweight division, clearly Duran has the better work because of how many successful title defenses he made at that weight class.
But we have to look at the overall performance, and Lomachenko, according to the numbers, has outperformed Duran in World Title matches. So it's not a matter of belief, it's a matter of fact because everything I said is true. For example that Loma has an 85 percent success rate in world title matches while Duran has a 76 percent success rate in world title matches.
The nice thing about numbers is that they don't lie.Comment
-
Comment
-
-
Comment
-
-
You're just looking to troll I see. In that case I won't entertain your nonsense any further, then.
Everyone knows Loma beat Salido. One judge sure as hell thought he did. Anyway, my only takeaway from what you said is that it's easier now to have much higher quality competition because of the number of champions available. In other words, Duran fought a lot of bums.
And you're right. Loma doesn't make Duran say "NO MAS." Loma makes Duran say "NO MASCHENKO."
U dumb?
Esteban De Jesus was a great fighter who won titles at 135 AND 140 lbs.
He would have beaten Lomachenko too.Comment
-
Brotha, Duran's career is already over, meaning his success rate will stay at 76%. On the other hand, Loma's career isn't over yet, so it could go down. If you brought up Lomas success rate in his third fight, then it would only have been 66%. Gotta wait till it's all done
What do you mean do I believe this? Those are the real numbers. I'm not making it up. You can check for yourself.
I'll put it to you this way, since we are focusing on the lightweight division, clearly Duran has the better work because of how many successful title defenses he made at that weight class.
But we have to look at the overall performance, and Lomachenko, according to the numbers, has outperformed Duran in World Title matches. So it's not a matter of belief, it's a matter of fact because everything I said is true. For example that Loma has an 85 percent success rate in world title matches while Duran has a 76 percent success rate in world title matches.
The nice thing about numbers is that they don't lie.
Secondly, quality of opposition have to be considered when you mention this. Demetrius Andrade has a 100% success rate in title fights. Is he better than Marvin Hagler, who has a lesser success rate? Lol
And to the Salido point, if someone even comes close to losing against Salido, or has a questionable fight, then good luck with beating Duran lol we saw how Loma's main weakness are aggressive fighters that are bigger than him. That basically describes Duran
Comment

(And yeah, I know it hurts.
) 
Comment