Shawn Porter the most overrated boxer of our generation

[DoubleMM]

boring, sloppy, fights dirty, zero power, fought like a wrestling match

zero fanbase. lost all his big fights.

given a gift vs ugas.

knocked down by adrien broner

even part time thurman dusted his ass and part time got smashed by a semi retired old man pacquiao shows how overated shawn was

why is he considered good?

oh because he's "a nice guy" and "humble"

to top it all off, people call him a "warrior" and yet his daddy had to save him before the going got tough.

fraud.

[maguirre]

Here we go again. You should have posted these types of threads before the fight began. Now you're essentially degrading Mr Bud Crawford's win. Which brings us back to zero again. Spence won't fight him. Who else is there for Mr Bud?

[Kzbox]

Mate we already did this why you starting the exact same thread when your other thread had 20 + replies. you must really hate this man.

https://www.boxingscene.com/forums/boxing-forums/non-stop-boxing/31191790-why-does-shawn-porter-get-so-much-love

[techliam]

Either way fights with Brook, Thurman and Spence

only really decisively lost to Crawford

in a parallel universe, Porter won all of those fights, Crawford excepted, putting on the exact same performances. How different would your view be then?

if any different, your view is skewed by official results, instead of actual performances in the ring. This type of thinking brings legitimacy to the worst part of this sport…

[KillaMane26]

Yeah watever hater.

Anytime someone brings up a guy falling from a flash knockdown even though they dominated a fight, it lets me know the TS is trolling or a hater

[QueensburyRules]

boring, sloppy, fights dirty, zero power, fought like a wrestling match

zero fanbase. lost all his big fights.

given a gift vs ugas.

knocked down by adrien broner

even part time thurman dusted his ass and part time got smashed by a semi retired old man pacquiao shows how overated shawn was

why is he considered good?

oh because he's "a nice guy" and "humble"

to top it all off, people call him a "warrior" and yet his daddy had to save him before the going got tough.

fraud.

- -How he be that bad when U in 10way tie for dummest forum member of the decade?

'Toopid?

[just the facts]

- -How he be that bad when U in 10way tie for dummest forum member of the decade?

'Toopid?

You’re on that list too.

[DaNeutral.]

boring, sloppy, fights dirty, zero power, fought like a wrestling match

zero fanbase. lost all his big fights.

given a gift vs ugas.

knocked down by adrien broner

even part time thurman dusted his ass and part time got smashed by a semi retired old man pacquiao shows how overated shawn was

why is he considered good?

oh because he's "a nice guy" and "humble"

to top it all off, people call him a "warrior" and yet his daddy had to save him before the going got tough.

fraud.

What are your views on Terrence Crawford? There seemed to be alot of demands for Crawford to prove himself against real fighters such as Porter and now Crawford has dealt with Porter better than Errol Spence did there seems to be alot of comments about how Porter was overrated.

So are these your honest thoughts or are you just anti Terence Crawford?

[Floyd is TBE]

Either way fights with Brook, Thurman and Spence

only really decisively lost to Crawford

in a parallel universe, Porter won all of those fights, Crawford excepted, putting on the exact same performances. How different would your view be then?

if any different, your view is skewed by official results, instead of actual performances in the ring. This type of thinking brings legitimacy to the worst part of this sport…

Those fights were not "either way". Post like these are why people have been calling Porter overrated. He lost to Spence, Brook, and Thurman and the losses were all clear. The fights are on Youtube, they weren't close at all. Porter is a great example of fans overvaluing ineffective aggression.

[TernceBudCharlo]

lmao 4 months ago y'all say e was the boogeyman now he's a bum