I will say this about Crawford - at least all his wins have come with no real controversy (sorry revelated). A lot of Canelo's wins either didn't really happen or were very close/debatable/controversial.
I will say this about Crawford - at least all his wins have come with no real controversy (sorry revelated). A lot of Canelo's wins either didn't really happen or were very close/debatable/controversial.
This is what happens when you fight real compition. This is also what happens when you challenge yourself by fighting champions with greater physical attributes than you.
Canelo is always at a height and reach advantage and he's fighting legitimate champions... Let's get real here.
Golovkin was a P4P fighter, one of the elite fighters in the sport.
Shawn Porter is a solid, B-level fighter.
There's no comparison between the two fighters.
Why was Glolovkin a p4p fighter? What did he do to earn it and who did he beat? At least he fought Danny Jacobs and was in an even fight, Shawn fought Keith, prime Kell, Danny Garcia, all who are just as good maybe better than Jacobs and did just as good as G against Jacobs.
Another pathetic grasping for straws post. If you want Crawford to be #1 p4p tell him to fight ESJ, Charlo, Andrade, GGG.
Trying to convince people Porter is more than b level fighter to make Crawford look better is fkin sad...
Lmao you want him to go up in weight and fight Charlo and Andrade while Canelo is too scared to fight them even with a big weight advantage. We know what time it is.
Comment