Comments Thread For: Crawford-Porter: All-Time Great vs. Great Fighter

[Yaconcha]

Let’s calm down on this, Shawn porter is a great fighter without doubt.
terence Crawford is nearly great by comparison. Should he win against showtime then! He would be nearer the great fighter porter has consistently shown he is against any win or loss he’s had and why? His record against level of opponents is better. Fact.
crawfordhas been in the most live
y of weight categories for the last 10/15 years and fought only a couple…maybe one…erm….not sure about elite but he’s unbeaten.
tonight will test him.

[F l i c k e r]

Maybe but from his current resume, Crawford isn't an all-time great at all. What ATG has he beaten? What truly 'great' fighter has he beaten? Postol isn't aging well, plain and simple. So, from an objective standpoint, he certainly is not an ATG. Just a great fight for the era.

Porter on the other hand, he is a certified great fighter. Not ATG but if he had all W's on his record, he'd be an ATG hands down. Because he's fought that many great opponents.

[The Old LefHook]

Dixon is a registered, thoroughbred halfwit. Crawford is no ATG. What happened to proving it?