If Crawford convincingly beats Porter tomorrow…

[Boxing-1013]

If anyone is really hating on Crawford at this point, then they will find a way to keep hating on him. The man has never come close to losing, and has fought a lot of good and really good fighters.

I expect a clear win vs Porter tomorrow, we will see.

[just the facts]

Honestly I expect Crawford to stop Porter. I will honestly be disappointed if Bud wins by UD.

Considering that Porters been in with a virtual phukc ton of quality fighters with out being seriously rocked let alone stopped why would you be disappointed?

[just the facts]

If anyone is really hating on Crawford at this point, then they will find a way to keep hating on him. The man has never come close to losing, and has fought a lot of good and really good fighters.

I expect a clear win vs Porter tomorrow, we will see.

Who has Crawford fought that at the time he fought them was “really good”?

[QueensburyRules]

Will the people who claim he’s a “hype job” or “hasn’t fought anybody” finally give him some credit?

- -Not if u get arrested for solicitation in public.

[RJJ-94-02=GOAT]

I give Crawford credit already. Still doesn't change that Porter will be his best opponent or that his resume at WW isn't too impressive

His Welterweight resume is poor, I certainly agree with that, but Porter is a top 3/4 Welterweight no doubt and this fight will prove how good/great Bud is.

However, what I’m seeing is several guys already moving the goalposts. Suddenly Crawford has to stop Porter because Porter is “shot” and a “part time boxer” and a load of other nonsense.

I think anyone who’s a genuine fan of the sport will admit IF Crawford convincingly beats Porter he’s the #1 guy in the division and justifiably a top P4P fighter- that’s coming from an Errol Spence fan too.

[Boxfan83]

Considering that Porters been in with a virtual phukc ton of quality fighters with out being seriously rocked let alone stopped why would you be disappointed?

Because I believe Terrance Crawford is on another level & if he doesnt stop Porter than he proves me wrong.

& yes Porter has been rocked (Broner and Spence) and hes been outboxed (Julio Diaz). My thought is, Porter is going to eventually eat a counter and Buds going to finish him. I cant see anyway Porter outboxes Crawford and if he tries he will get caught that way too.

I predict Crawford catches him with an uppercut counter somewhere in the mid rounds and Porter isnt recovering.

[RJJ-94-02=GOAT]

Who has Crawford fought that at the time he fought them was “really good”?

Postol is probably the only one. Was undefeated, ranked #1 in the division and had just knocked Matthysse out.

Even a past prime Postol gave Taylor and Ramirez big problems.

[icha]

crawford gets credit from me just for making the fight, this is a step on the right direction.... he doesnt need to dominate, but if he does then even better...

[Rip Chudd]

His Welterweight resume is poor, I certainly agree with that, but Porter is a top 3/4 Welterweight no doubt and this fight will prove how good/great Bud is.

However, what I’m seeing is several guys already moving the goalposts. Suddenly Crawford has to stop Porter because Porter is “shot” and a “part time boxer” and a load of other nonsense.

I think anyone who’s a genuine fan of the sport will admit IF Crawford convincingly beats Porter he’s the #1 guy in the division and justifiably a top P4P fighter- that’s coming from an Errol Spence fan too.

I'm with you bro. If he wins convincingly it only legitimizes him further. I don't get the unwarranted hate though, Porter is a top welterweight, no need to diminish him should he lose because you may not like Crawford. It stinks of bias but unfortunately those are "boxing fans" nowadays. I'd get it if Porter was actually showing signs of slipping but he brings it every single fight. He did lose to Ugas though in my opinion

[GrandpaBernard]

I’ll be impressed if he easy works Porter or knocks him out

Brook did the cleanest job on Porter and it still wasn’t easy fight