Originally posted by Mickey Pearson
View Post
Most of us live in a complex world where actions often have bits of truth, bits of falsehood...
Most of us who have kids know the nightmare "consent" and the new doctrines about what it should be... specifically how they often violate natural actions... are a nightmare.
Yet your so fckin smart you know, with no trial, no evidence, etc... when someone has absolutely violated someone. How do you do it?
This girl may/may not have been violated. We don't know the degree to which any violation took place... But you do!
And this little angel that you compare to a mother... presumably to make the case for a responsible individual... She was wordly enough to wait on this, to act with deliberation and intent... to make sure she basically wrecked this guy... SUCH a little naive angel! Almost as naive as the women that put Tyson in jail after going to his hotel room, another angel presumably.
So... your concerned with the possibility of ****, and this guy Romero? he defintitely seems a shady and unpleasant character... And if it is established he did ****? Let him fight and pay the victim!
You might also concern yourself with men who are not like Romero and who can just as easily be framed by an innocent angel like this individual that made sure she framed her allegation in public media at the right time. No trial required! Judge jury and executioner... and why would this little angel involve herself with a scmbag like Romero? Was it haphanstance? Did he show up at the Harvard anniversary dance? You ever hear the expression "don't come to court with dirt on your own hands?" You would assume in this case that there is a clear line and this women was clearly violated when she is associating with a scmbag? REally? yet she is to be thought of as "mother?" Your a cuk.
Your naive, its debatable if you are even well intentioned... For every stanford rapist, or aggressive thug, there are loads of men who are victimized by women who were not ****d, who consented, and who want a way to "win." I hope you don't have sons... I do. I worry a lot about their opportunities and who may victimize them, as much as I would worry if I had two daughters....
Comment