Who has the better wins? Dillian Whyte or Deontay Wilder?

[W1LL]

A serious question. Take away Deontay Wilder's paper title reign, and "10 defences against potatoes doe!" In actual fact, Dillian Whyte defended his "Interim" title against stiffer opposition than Wilder defended the full title. In my humble opinion, anyway. So how about it? How do people feel about this? Whyte's best wins versus Wilder's best?

Alexander Povetkin
Oscar Rivas
Joseph Parker
Dereck Chisora (x2)
Robert Helenius

or

Luis Ortiz (x2)
Dominic Breazeale
Bermane Stiverne (x2)
Artur Szpilka
Gerald Washington

?????

Feel free to change the names of Wilder's opponents if you think he beat anyone better than I listed.

Whyte's list contains two former World champions and two former European champions, one Olympic champion and two Olympians in total. Wilder's list contains one former World champion, and nothing else of note, no Olympians either.

[Toffee]

It's Whyte, obviously. But not forgetting that Wilder was defending titles, which puts it up a notch.

But point taken. Wilder is less proven in the ring then Whyte.

[Robbie Barrett]

Whyte doesn't get his due, he's the 2nd most hated HW on here after Joshua. 2 guys Wilder ducked.

[TMLT87]

As much as I **** on Wilders resume, to be fair, Povetkin sparked Whyte the first time and looked like he'd been on the vodka all day in the rematch. Parker fight should have been a draw. First Chisora fight could have gone either way or been a draw. I suppose you'd still have to give him the edge on resume but neither of them are very impressive.

[Robbie Barrett]

As much as I **** on Wilders resume, to be fair, Povetkin sparked Whyte the first time and looked like he'd been on the vodka all day in the rematch. Parker fight should have been a draw. First Chisora fight could have gone either way or been a draw. I suppose you'd still have to give him the edge on resume but neither of them are very impressive.

Before he got caught by Povetkin he was dominating. Whyte like Chisora will fight anybody. These are the fighters that should get applauded not hated.

[W1LL]

As much as I **** on Wilders resume, to be fair, Povetkin sparked Whyte the first time and looked like he'd been on the vodka all day in the rematch. Parker fight should have been a draw. First Chisora fight could have gone either way or been a draw. I suppose you'd still have to give him the edge on resume but neither of them are very impressive.

As you are so eager to criticize Whyte's wins, it is only fair to do the same to Wilder's. Your opinion on Stiverne's shape in the second fight? Wilder struggling desperately in two fights versus Ortiz? The same Ortiz who has never acheived anything of note Pro or Am? Criticizing Whyte's wins solely makes you look like a biased cuck phaggot... maybe that's what you are, maybe it isn't. But that's what it looks like from your first post.

[removed]

Wilder's draw against Fury is better than anything on Whyte's resume.

[W1LL]

Wilder's draw against Fury is better than anything on Whyte's resume.

Whyte beating AJ in the amateurs is better than Deontay and Marsellus Wilder's resumes combined.

[Robbie Barrett]

Wilder's draw against Fury is better than anything on Whyte's resume.

So now you're claiming that was a legit draw just to discredit Whyte?

[TMLT87]

As you are so eager to criticize Whyte's wins, it is only fair to do the same to Wilder's. Your opinion on Stiverne's shape in the second fight? Wilder struggling desperately in two fights versus Ortiz? The same Ortiz who has never acheived anything of note Pro or Am? Criticizing Whyte's wins solely makes you look like a biased cuck phaggot... maybe that's what you are, maybe it isn't. But that's what it looks like from your first post.

I literally started with "as much as I **** on Wilders resume" and ended with giving Whyte the edge and saying neither are very impressive. Change your tampon and calm down.