Fury vs Wilder 3 was the best fight of all time

[The plunger man]

And that is only 1 punch, his straight right hand. He cannot get a ko with any other punch. His opponent has to be standing right in front of him in order for him to get a ko. Its as if this generation of fans have never seen a fight pre-2012.

boxing is being destroyed by casuals who know nothing about boxing in terms of achievement and skill.
I would not bet against usyk.....technically he on another level with his stamina , punch selection , movement and IQ.
You imagine him against wilder he would tie him up in knots and it would be embarrassing to witness.
Firstly I want to say fury showed great heart, great recovery powers and was just a dog in there and broke wilder down....fury also showed integrity and humility after that fight and that was brilliant.
But these idiots on here have no idea what they are looking at.
Usyk , Joshua would destroy wilder and would also cause huge problems for fury.
Now it’s time for fury to fight somebody else and hopefully it will be either usyk or Joshua ....even whyte has more ability than wilder and that’s saying something.
if fury go’s on to beat whyte , usyk or Joshua then he will get my full appraisal but I will not give it with wins over somebody Who is technically so poor as wilder without beating a top other fighter in the division

[The plunger man]

To be honest, this fight wasn't special at all in terms of boxing ability. It was trash from both fighters, although Fury's trash was clearly better than Wilder's trash. I cringed throughout the whole fight. For Wilder, all he had to do was slow down and time his right hand, and he would put Fury's lights out. But he didn't have that ability, he was too wild. Fury, a much better boxer, negated all his skills by smothering great shots he landed, which actually helped Wilder. And he wasn't using much in the way of feints or head movement, which allowed Wilder to catch him clean more than necessary, as well as 2 KDs. Fury definitely didn't train much for this fight, the lazy bastard, and almost lost the fight because of it. Thankfully, Wilder didn't know how to capitalize on a hurt Fury on multiple occasions (2 KDs and end of 10th round when Fury seemed out on his feet). Overall, Fury deserved the win, and I hope he trains his ass off for Usyk, because Usyk will capitalize on all the mistakes he made tonight. Looking forward to that fight already.

usyk is a supreme technician and although he would be hugely outweighed and size disparity...fury would find it almost impossible to pin him down and maul him...so let people keep discounting usyk and the bigger shock it will be.
it would be like pacquiao vs Margarito and we saw what happened there

[nixxter]

It was a very entertaining and intense fight but in terms of quality it was pretty sloppy.

[nickp91]

Fury vs Wilder 3 was tremendous! Also the referee in the fight was the best referee I've ever seen In Boxing

[The plunger man]

You have to understand how punchers work...First off everytime people talk about Wilder's chances for a decision it is amusing. A puncher guages success by how many times he can unload and hopefully finish his opponent. Look at something like the Louis Conn fight. Louis was outboxed the entire fight, but he needed just a few opportunities to finish Conn off. Wilder was succesful to an amazing degree because he got Fury in trouble. That was his chance to win the fight.

I know its a little misleading, because we look at boxing matches in terms of punches, rounds won, etc... But a puncher needs a certain amount of cracks to succeed. Lets say hypothetically Wilder had hit Fury well again, as he did in that one round... and lost every other round, would it matter? If Fury could not get up? Fury was pretty shaken up... Wilder had his opportunity. It was infact in some respects a close fight for that reason. Wilder's incentive to hang in there was to deliver his right hand shot again..

yeah bill but Louis was technically sound ...ok a bit flat footed yes but his timing was outstanding , punch technique and placement 2nd to none and his ability to finish someone only rivalled by Ray Leonard , he also had a devastating left hook, was economical and held his technique all through the fight.
wilder is an appalling heavyweight in almost every department in boxing except punch.
I honestly think you could take a NBA basketball player ...kidnap him and lock him away for two years inside a boxing gym and after 2 years he would emerge far superior in terms of skill than wilder.
wilder is that bad

[iamboxing]

Great fight, but calm down. Go watch more fights. Start with Barrera vs Morales, Ali vs Frazier 1 & 2, Holyfield vs Steward, Hamed vs Kelley, Hagler vs Hearns......etc etc.

[Nash out]

stop this bull**** ....wilder was getting outboxed by spilka ffs and pulled it out the bag and Chisora flattened spilka in 2 rounds....stop it....wilder is terrible end of story....and your clueless if you can look at wilder and not shake your head in disbelief in how technically poor he is......I’ve never seen such a technically poor heavyweight champion as wilder was or is
yeah there were knockdowns and back & forth yea it was exciting as hell...but you can have that on a club card or street fight.....I’m talking about how you judge an all time great fight and wilder simply has no ability besides his right....what else does he have tell me ? Hi is jab is non existent , his balance is appalling , can’t fight going backwards and even when he attacks its telegraphed , cannot put a combination together , arms down by his waist , no stamina and looks gone by round 5.
just sit down look at wilder in the ring and then look at usyk ffs......Nash behave

A great fight is not just about technical ability. Just like Hagler vs Hearns' 3 rounder, entertainment level was high, but the skill level on display (in that fight) was very, very low. Just a phone booth dust-up. People love living in denial though. Nash out - a true warrior of boxingscene - never afraid to tell the truth and tear things up a bit.

[The plunger man]

A great fight is not just about technical ability. Just like Hagler vs Hearns' 3 rounder, entertainment level was high, but the skill level on display (in that fight) was very, very low. Just a phone booth dust-up. People love living in denial though. Nash out - a true warrior of boxingscene - never afraid to tell the truth and tear things up a bit.

There was no mauling in the hagler hearns fight..yes it was intense but phone booth fighting where both guys landed monster shots while not clinching , not grappling or hitting behind the head or headlocks and only a fool could even compare a sloppy free for a all to a that of a hagler vs hearns which was wild but also contested on a high level in terms of punch selection.
This fight had no resemblance what so ever to hagler and hearns

[miron_lang]

Not even close to being the best fight of all time.

Bowe-Holy 3 was better

non heavyweights like Corrales-Castillo, Barrera-Morales were also better

[Albanianboxing]

It was an absolutely GREAT FIGHT!!!!! Fury is a MASSIVE SUPERSTAR now!!!