"French girl" fought last month not last week. She's fought twice in a month before. Bridges fought Bec Connolly the month prior to her fight. it's not an uncommon event to fight a month later. Of course those facts don't support your narrative but you've never really been particularly unbiased in your posts so why bother now.
Yeah, the house fighter in Bridges nicked it by a point on the ref's card but if you think she legitimately "edged" it then there's nothing I can do for you.
She hasn't fought since. Anywhere. Who cares about whether she's fought so soon afterwards before? The point i'm getting at is you thinking Hearn doesn't want her because he hasn't had her back. I guess then no one wants her back if that's the case. But you're saying i'm running a narrative? What are you even on about. Then you say "Facts". What????
Everyone watching at the time on the forums edged it to Bridges. I'm not alone there.
She hasn't fought since. Anywhere. Who cares about whether she's fought so soon afterwards before? The point i'm getting at is you thinking Hearn doesn't want her because he hasn't had her back. I guess then no one wants her back if that's the case. But you're saying i'm running a narrative? What are you even on about. Then you say "Facts". What????
Everyone watching at the time on the forums edged it to Bridges. I'm not alone there.
Oh, and by the way, she is actually French.
Man you ramble. You're getting at a point? I think you quite missed mine. The point I was making is that Hearn doesn't want Courtenay in against anyone that could possibly beat her (of which the French girl Mailys Gangloff is one of many that could beat her). Rachel Ball was supposed to be a soft touch until she dropped and soundly outboxed Shannon.
You make bad arguments that aren't even factually correct. You stated the French girl fought last week inferring a short turnaround when it was actually a month. I must have struck a nerve with my criticism of Courtenay's boxing ability, didn't realize you were so emotional about her. Cheers
Man you ramble. You're getting at a point? I think you quite missed mine. The point I was making is that Hearn doesn't want Courtenay in against anyone that could possibly beat her (of which the French girl Mailys Gangloff is one of many that could beat her). Rachel Ball was supposed to be a soft touch until she dropped and soundly outboxed Shannon.
You make bad arguments that aren't even factually correct. You stated the French girl fought last week inferring a short turnaround when it was actually a month. I must have struck a nerve with my criticism of Courtenay's boxing ability, didn't realize you were so emotional about her. Cheers
Haha, the only one rambling here is you.
I wasn't being literal with it being a week. But you weren't expecting her to fight this weekend, so it must have been over the last couple of weeks or so. So a week on your part is actually quite true.
You said Eddie didn't want her back. Have you got anything from Eddie or the girl that confirms your comments? If not, you're running a narrative. Yet you accused me of doing so. It seems you're projecting and desperately trying to turn it on me. That is being emotional. In fact, it's disturbing. Nice try though, but it's the usual arrogant American trick. But arrogance without intellect just provides stupidity.
You also accused me of running narratives in the past too. Care to back this up as well?
Lets see if you answer the questions or do the usual American thing and avoid. I know where my money is being placed.
Going by your standard and considering how many uncommitted and fat b4stard boxers I've seen miss weight (looking at you Gervonta Davis & Julio Cesar Chavez Jr among others) wondering if anyone should take men's boxing seriously...
It would be like a man saying that he came in a few pounds overweight because he just had a break up with his girl. It's a laughable excuse from a laughable sport
I wasn't being literal with it being a week. But you weren't expecting her to fight this weekend, so it must have been over the last couple of weeks or so. So a week on your part is actually quite true.
You said Eddie didn't want her back. Have you got anything from Eddie or the girl that confirms your comments? If not, you're running a narrative. Yet you accused me of doing so. It seems you're projecting and desperately trying to turn it on me. That is being emotional. In fact, it's disturbing. Nice try though, but it's the usual arrogant American trick. But arrogance without intellect just provides stupidity.
You also accused me of running narratives in the past too. Care to back this up as well?
Lets see if you answer the questions or do the usual American thing and avoid. I know where my money is being placed.
"Usual American thing"? Painting with a broad brush again. You're a nationalist with a nationalist bias...that's your narrative. Look at your posts, nearly every comment has some nationalist angle (e.g. 10/08/21:"The US is about nothing but corruption.."09/30/21: "Americans create smoke, but no fire.:, etc.), Sure, I'm American and my favorite fighter is a Brit. Look at my posts, no nationalism. I could care less where someone comes from. My comments regarding Gangloff (aka "the French woman" to your nationalist eyes) and her presence on a Hearn card were specifically regarding Courtenay on a Courtenay thread. I struck a nerve with your national sensitivities, either with Courtenay, with Hearn and Matchroom or just with Brits in general. Courtenay is no good, yet she is a staple on cards because she's a draw. They tried their best to match her against winnable fights and that failed. I've criticized PBS, Top Rank, Matchroom and Queensbury cards equally...As for you, well you're just a nationalist fraud.
"Usual American thing"? Painting with a broad brush again. You're a nationalist with a nationalist bias...that's your narrative. Look at your posts, nearly every comment has some nationalist angle (e.g. 10/08/21:"The US is about nothing but corruption.."09/30/21: "Americans create smoke, but no fire.:, etc.), Sure, I'm American and my favorite fighter is a Brit. Look at my posts, no nationalism. I could care less where someone comes from. My comments regarding Gangloff (aka "the French woman" to your nationalist eyes) and her presence on a Hearn card were specifically regarding Courtenay on a Courtenay thread. I struck a nerve with your national sensitivities, either with Courtenay, with Hearn and Matchroom or just with Brits in general. Courtenay is no good, yet she is a staple on cards because she's a draw. They tried their best to match her against winnable fights and that failed. I've criticized PBS, Top Rank, Matchroom and Queensbury cards equally...As for you, well you're just a nationalist fraud.
Yes, it's the usual American thing. I'm only acknowledging the truth. If you don't like it, then don't behave like it then. If you disagree with anything, then say so. But it's hard when everything i say is true.
I asked you a question about the comment regarding Hearn and how he supposedly doesn't want the French girl back. It doesn't really have anything to do with Shannon on my part. That wasn't why i was asking the question. I was asking it because so many Americans run their own agendas and make things up just to spew poison and bitterness when it comes to Hearn. But it seems to have put your nose out of joint because you knew you couldn't answer my simple question. Don't make comments that you can't back up. And don't project onto me like so many of you do.
Question: Did Hearn or the French girl make any comment what so ever in regard to fighting on MatchRoom cards in the future like you claimed Eddie did? What is so hard about that?
Why would i know the name of the French girl? Is she a big household name or something? I don't know who she is. Don't pretend you do either. You're trying to make a point where there isn't one just to be petty.
Then to top it off, you come with a lack of irony when saying "I make bad arguments". haha. I wasn't making an argument. You were. I was just asking a question after you made comments you couldn't back up. You then projected and took offence to an innocent question.
Comment