Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Anthony Joshua: Do I Need Tyson Fury On My Record? I Need It!

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Originally posted by Drigo View Post
    Joshua need Fury but Fury dont need Joshua to cement his legacy. Simply because Joshua already lose and he lose badly by KO. Fury won't gain anything but money in beating Joshua. Sad but truth.
    No, don't look at it like this, they need each other. Equally!
    some say Josh has better resume so don't obsess too much about a loss? If Josh and fury fight, then fury might have a loss also.
    If fury beats Josh then you can assume fury beats Charles martin, parker, takam and usyk and everyone else Josh has beat.
    well triangle theories don't work but fury will be beating a great fighter and fury needs as many greats in his resume as possible.​​​ Ali has got liston, foreman, Frasier etc we will need to compare like for like.
    Boxing needs it.
    Last edited by hugh grant; 09-14-2021, 04:04 AM.

    Comment


    • #12
      Old news we heard this BS from joshua / hearn during the Wilder saga with hearn fooling the casuals into thinking they wanted the Wilder fight but turned down the 50million on the back of daddy Hearn "you dont take chances you dont go to the other blokes backyard, if AJs unbeaten for 10 years and dosnt fight Wilder i'll take that". Fast forward to Tyson Fury pretending to make a fight that could never take place because Wilder had legal over Fury and hearn playing dumb i didnt know im just a simple boy.......

      Comment


      • #13
        Originally posted by Sayithowitisuk View Post

        So in 18 when Aj was on a sky tv interview with Johnny Nelson & said "i won't be rushed into the Wilder fight" when asked when he said"19 20 21"Hearn then said 2020 quack, followed by "hopefully he'll have lost by then" What do you hear? They tell us they're 3 year plan to avoid the big hitters & you hear?

        Ajs resume is full of shot old name's, 4 of his last 6 were 38-41 year's old & he's never boxed a top 2 heavyweight, Klitschko wasn't ranked by tbrb until after the fight & retired again. Wlad got paid!
        I'm not bigging Fury, he's lost my support to... 7 fight's in 7 year's
        Wilder who Aj ducked in 18 then turned down that dazn cheque in 19 shows they were happy to duck each other & milk the belts against old men.
        They're as bad as each other. Blame the promoter's.

        Post n ghost
        Lol "so in 18 when bla bla bla" we all know what Wilder said. However I agree it is all on the promoters.

        Comment


        • #14
          Originally posted by Drigo View Post
          Joshua need Fury but Fury dont need Joshua to cement his legacy. Simply because Joshua already lose and he lose badly by KO. Fury won't gain anything but money in beating Joshua. Sad but truth.
          If you want to tell yourself that, and that makes you think it's true, then by all means keep living in that fantasy world.

          Comment


          • #15
            Originally posted by DaNeutral. View Post
            It will for ever be a talking point when discussing Joshua and his resume but unless something changes we will be saying that regardless of who we thought would of won it was Fury that never seemed to want that fight and anybody who knows how dirty Boxing works knows that Fury and Warren and Arum knew damn well that they were not going to be fighting AJ in 2021 even though they pretended they were up for it.

            So it would be a shame for AJ and his resume but it would be because Fury is a ducker. Same same thing we would say about Wilder too, especially now Wilder came out and even acknowledged he was turning down better offers to face Joshua.
            Fury hopefully will fight AJ. Not saying I'd bet my mortgage on it, but once he takes care of Wilder I think he'll do it. They're just so unprofessional in the way they go about their buisness. Wilder only ever beats AJ in the media and in the void of tiny minds. These scarecrows actually think they're guy will man up lol. Social media now means the cowards don't need to fight.

            Comment


            • #16
              Originally posted by Sayithowitisuk View Post
              Fury's already beaten 2 world number 1s for all the belts in theyre own back yards as the underdog & 2 of the top 3 are now in a trilogy fight. That's why he's number 1.
              4 of Ajs last 6 were 38-41 year's old and shot & rematch clause has never boxed a top 2 heavyweight. Again don't say Klitschko, he was unranked on tbrb until after the fight because i dunno he was 41 shot & retired. Wlad got paid!
              Bitd Mike Tyson murdered a 38 yr old Holmes who would arguably beat all of Ajs old men & he got no credit & got criticised for fighting him yet for rematch clause it's the norm. This division has fallen off a cliff into mediocrity.
              All the top 3 in they're own way are as bad as each other. I blame the promoter's, i honestly believe they would all fight more regularly if they were allowed to.
              So why did none of them want AJ when he was no1 and still undefeated at the time. Yet now he's been beaten they claim to want that fight now? Scarecrow Fury and tin man Wilder need to grow a pair.

              Comment


              • #17
                Originally posted by Sayithowitisuk View Post
                Fury's already beaten 2 world number 1s for all the belts in theyre own back yards as the underdog & 2 of the top 3 are now in a trilogy fight. That's why he's number 1.
                4 of Ajs last 6 were 38-41 year's old and shot & rematch clause has never boxed a top 2 heavyweight. Again don't say Klitschko, he was unranked on tbrb until after the fight because i dunno he was 41 shot & retired.
                You keep posting it, I'll keep correcting you.

                Wlad was number one in TBRB but was removed from the rankings just prior to the Joshua fight. After the Joshua fight he was reinstated at 2 (behind Joshua who was ranked 2 prior to Klitschko's removal and then 1). So not shot and retired then.

                They got that wrong. They removed Klitschko because he didn't have a fight booked (due to Fury) and then failed to reinstate him when he signed for Joshua. Make no mistake, that fight was 1 v 2.

                On that basis, Joshua is the lineal champion, and has beaten two #1 opponents (Ruiz was also ranked 1).

                He also has the deeper resume. And has repeatedly tried to make the undisputed fight.

                Comment


                • #18
                  be careful what you wish. I expect Fury to beat you really bad if the fight ever happens. Why should I expect something else?

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    Originally posted by Sayithowitisuk View Post

                    So in 18 when Aj was on a sky tv interview with Johnny Nelson & said "i won't be rushed into the Wilder fight" when asked when he said"19 20 21"Hearn then said 2020 quack, followed by "hopefully he'll have lost by then" What do you hear? They tell us they're 3 year plan to avoid the big hitters & you hear?

                    Ajs resume is full of shot old name's, 4 of his last 6 were 38-41 year's old & he's never boxed a top 2 heavyweight, Klitschko wasn't ranked by tbrb until after the fight & retired again. Wlad got paid!
                    I'm not bigging Fury, he's lost my support to... 7 fight's in 7 year's
                    Wilder who Aj ducked in 18 then turned down that dazn cheque in 19 shows they were happy to duck each other & milk the belts against old men.
                    They're as bad as each other. Blame the promoter's.

                    Post n ghost
                    Talk doesn't matter. Actions do. You seem to like your numbers, so here's some. 3 fighters and only 1 has actually made real offers to fight and that's AJ. Do the math on that one. NO BS HERE UK.

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      Originally posted by First order View Post
                      Old news we heard this BS from joshua / hearn during the Wilder saga with hearn fooling the casuals into thinking they wanted the Wilder fight but turned down the 50million on the back of daddy Hearn "you dont take chances you dont go to the other blokes backyard, if AJs unbeaten for 10 years and dosnt fight Wilder i'll take that". Fast forward to Tyson Fury pretending to make a fight that could never take place because Wilder had legal over Fury and hearn playing dumb i didnt know im just a simple boy.......
                      Hahaha listen coco, you need to get real about that 50 mil offer and go back to your UFO hunting. Real offers come from real men, and not cowards who fantasize about what they haven't got and won't get.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP