Dont you think its kind of harsh to judge the hands of MMA fighters, when boxers dont even do 90% of the **** MMA fighters do AT ALL? i'm sure Canelos guard passes aint too great either.
How much does it really matter if someones boxing is relatively poor if the rest of their skillset makes it so they dont need to box with you in the first place?
Its apples to oranges. Boxing has bigger gloves, ref counts and its pretty much tunnel vision compared to MMA in terms of the target area and the weapons used. All of that makes it much harder for someone to land a hail Mary out of nowhere and score an upset. The difference is, a pure boxer cannot recreate what Mercer did at will, its punchers chance which isnt going to work out the vast majority of the time.
Ok simple question - if there was a card where 10 top MMA fighters fought 10 top boxers of comparable size, under a ruleset that allows both sides to use all of their skills (well...MMA rules allow that already)...what do you think the final score would be?
How much does it really matter if someones boxing is relatively poor if the rest of their skillset makes it so they dont need to box with you in the first place?
Its apples to oranges. Boxing has bigger gloves, ref counts and its pretty much tunnel vision compared to MMA in terms of the target area and the weapons used. All of that makes it much harder for someone to land a hail Mary out of nowhere and score an upset. The difference is, a pure boxer cannot recreate what Mercer did at will, its punchers chance which isnt going to work out the vast majority of the time.
Ok simple question - if there was a card where 10 top MMA fighters fought 10 top boxers of comparable size, under a ruleset that allows both sides to use all of their skills (well...MMA rules allow that already)...what do you think the final score would be?
Comment