George Foreman and Bernard Hopkins are two reasons Pacquiao should keep going

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • just the facts
    Undisputed Champion
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Jan 2014
    • 13791
    • 2,437
    • 1,021
    • 88,113

    #11
    Originally posted by ShaneMosleySr
    Why didn’t Spence fight Pacquiao? You said it was happening.


    Haven't you heard? Spence got an eye injury. Torn retina. It was all over the news. I know your not very smart but try to keep up.

    Comment

    • AboutBillions
      Interim Champion
      Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
      • Sep 2013
      • 729
      • 155
      • 91
      • 9,736

      #12
      Originally posted by ShaneMosleySr
      People told Bernard Hopkins he should retire after the loss to Cazalghe. His trainer even said Hopkins should retire publicly.

      Hopkins was 43 years old, just looked awful and had already cemented a hall
      of fame career.

      He won the light heavyweight championship twice after that fight and fought 12 more times, netting millions and millions of dollars.

      George Foreman lost 9 rounds to Tommy Morrison at age 44. Everyone told him that he should retire. He won the heavyweight championship in his very next fight and fought five more times, netting millions and millions of dollars.

      Pacquiao shouldn’t retire.
      Manny don’t have punchers chance like Forman and also not as slick as bebop. He’s a punching bag with cramped legs.

      Comment

      • ShaneMosleySr
        Banned
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Mar 2019
        • 10325
        • 1,049
        • 903
        • 276,311

        #13
        Didn’t you hear when the financing fell through for Crawford-Pacquiao? It was all over the news. I know you’re not very smart (don’t know the difference between your and you’re for example) but try to keep up.

        Originally posted by just the facts

        Haven't you heard? Spence got an eye injury. Torn retina. It was all over the news. I know your not very smart but try to keep up.

        Comment

        • elfag
          Alpha fäggot
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Jan 2008
          • 15649
          • 3,492
          • 302
          • 65,929

          #14
          Originally posted by ShaneMosleySr
          Hopkins made millions of dollars making fights you wouldn’t watch.

          And Foreman would not have knocked out an Ugas level fighter in his 40s.

          Foreman lost to Shannon Briggs. He beat Lou Savarese by split decision. He beat Axel Schultz by majority decision. He lost to Tommy Morrison and beat Alex Stewart by majority decision.

          Lets not change history.



          Ugas was 35, name a 35 year old that decision-ed 40s foreman. Foreman was 5 years older than current pac when he should have won the decision against briggs and when he beat savarese.

          In fact, Foreman did knock out a fighter better than 35 year old ugas in the lineal champion moorer.

          Foreman as a 40s fighter was far superior than pac as a 40s fighter, it is what it is, sorry if you dont like the reality.


          And hopkins being paid millions isnt indicative of his skill. I could name any number of untalented pop bands that make millions doesnt mean they are talented. DAZN is hemorrhaging money and GBP was mismanaged by ******* addict DLH. Promoters pay outs dont equate to ability. That he paid hopkins millions doesnt negate my point that he was a spoil sport and tried to get DQ wins by faking injuries, faking receiving low blows and falsely claim he was pushed out of the ring instead of KTFO out of the ring.



          Last edited by elfag; 08-22-2021, 04:19 PM.

          Comment

          • KillaMane26
            Big Boi Beezy
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Apr 2014
            • 16298
            • 2,565
            • 533
            • 174,475

            #15
            Foremon a heavyweight with ATG power and Hopkins a cagey boxer who didn't rely on natural athleticism vs Pacquiao who relies heavily on speed and footwork who isn't fighting in his natural weight class

            Comment

            • just the facts
              Undisputed Champion
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Jan 2014
              • 13791
              • 2,437
              • 1,021
              • 88,113

              #16
              Originally posted by ShaneMosleySr
              Didn’t you hear when the financing fell through for Crawford-Pacquiao? It was all over the news. I know you’re not very smart (don’t know the difference between your and you’re for example) but try to keep up.


              Even though that fight was NEVER signed, some ignorant douche bag actually came on this site and posted "Crawford's fighting Manny and all you Crawford detractors need to STFU. Like he had some insight and was scolding us Crawford.

              Oh wait, that ignorant douche bag was YOU!

              Comment

              • champion4ever
                Undisputed Champion
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Sep 2007
                • 23918
                • 4,090
                • 7,167
                • 202,915,785

                #17
                Originally posted by ShaneMosleySr
                People told Bernard Hopkins he should retire after the loss to Cazalghe. His trainer even said Hopkins should retire publicly.

                Hopkins was 43 years old, just looked awful and had already cemented a hall
                of fame career.

                He won the light heavyweight championship twice after that fight and fought 12 more times, netting millions and millions of dollars.

                George Foreman lost 9 rounds to Tommy Morrison at age 44. Everyone told him that he should retire. He won the heavyweight championship in his very next fight and fought five more times, netting millions and millions of dollars.

                Pacquiao shouldn’t retire.
                For the love of God dude! What are you trying to do? Are you trying to get Pac hurt? Pac is a shot fighter now. His body had betrayed him last night.

                The longer he fights the greater are his chances of getting seriously hurt. Let the all-time great Senator from the Philippines retire and enjoy the rest of his life with his family and the ones he loves.

                I didn't like the type of punishment he absorbed last night. Although Ugas wasn't trying to hurt him but yet he still has eaten more flush punches than he ever has in the last two fights alone than he has absorbed in a entire decade.

                Comment

                • Get em up
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Dec 2019
                  • 4455
                  • 1,353
                  • 1,179
                  • 34,261

                  #18
                  The OP is clearly an idiot. Its uncommon for ANYONE at 42 years of age to do the things Pac is doing. Much less be the absolute best at something as physical as boxing. Athletes DON'T GET BETTER WITH AGE. B Hop and Foreman are 2 people out of THOUSANDS. As another poster said they are the exception not the rule. Pac falls in the same category as far as I'm concerned. Fighting at the highest level at his age in a testament to the man he is. Win or lose.

                  Comment

                  • ShaneMosleySr
                    Banned
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • Mar 2019
                    • 10325
                    • 1,049
                    • 903
                    • 276,311

                    #19
                    Pacquiao signed to fight Crawford.

                    Originally posted by just the facts

                    Even though that fight was NEVER signed, some ignorant douche bag actually came on this site and posted "Crawford's fighting Manny and all you Crawford detractors need to STFU. Like he had some insight and was scolding us Crawford.

                    Oh wait, that ignorant douche bag was YOU!

                    Comment

                    • Stuntman Mike
                      Afk 2009 to 2011
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Sep 2012
                      • 4293
                      • 865
                      • 1,254
                      • 25,145

                      #20
                      Originally posted by ShaneMosleySr
                      You would have said the same thing after Morrison beat Foreman or after Calzaghe beat Hopkins.


                      Hopkins never got tagged as much as manny did ..he was always safety first

                      Foreman will always have obliterating power ...he would have a chance to ko Joshua right now if he landed on him


                      the smaller a fighter the quicker these lose their abilities and the quicker they enter their prime (historically)

                      Manny doesn't have the engine anymore ,he took far too many punches from somebody he would have dominated in his prime

                      It was good while it lasted but it doesn't hurt as much to me anymore he's been on the decline for years it's amazing he managed to beat thurman the way he did and looked sensational in other fights since bradly 2 (the true showing of his decline to me personally)

                      Manny is a legend and when he said he tried his best in the post fight it brought a tear to my eye

                      But mannys not upset and nor should his fans he's done himself proud and will forever be remembered as an icon equally as much as Muhammed Ali

                      We are lucky to have witnessed his fights live whether in broadcast or in person

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP