Comments Thread For: Canelo Spurns Golovkin Again, Prefers To Fight Charlo

[STREET CLEANER]

GGG was the only fighter that was competitive against Canelo and arguably won both fights and didn't cave in to Canelo's power and counterpunching ability. There is still money to be made with that fight but more than likely it would had to be at 168. Too bad that GGG has not raised his profile fighting any notable opponent so the fight would be in more demand.

[j0zef]

I am so done with ggg and canelo fighting each other. Canelo has ggg figured out, and ggg is afraid to engage and stand in front of canelo. The fight will be the same old fight, and we already know what to expect. I thought that canelo cleared any doubts from the first fight by beating ggg soundly and put an end to any trilogy. It does not make any sense anymore. I rather see canelo fight jermall, benavidez, plant, beterbiev or bivol.

Mmm not sure if you don't remember or haven't watched the fight, but these statements are simply not true. The second half of 2nd fight was ALL about engagement, with Golovkin being the attacker at least 50% of the time. (here's a link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dt6Ib_YuJOM)
He didn't beat anyone soundly. Even with Vegas scoring, Canelo was a majority decision by 1 round. Majority of boxing outlets scored it a draw, with more giving the fight to G than Canelo. It was an old article, you can find it yourself or someone can help if you're interested.
The biggest punch of any fight was landed by G at the end of the 2nd fight (link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cAipfGj0tRE).

It's still by FAR bigger fight than any other for Canelo or for boxing fans, nobody can compete with Golovkin's popularity (around Canelo's weight classes). To say the fight doesn't make sense any more is as wrong as it can be. It's a huge money fight, with the first 2 fights being ultra competitive. It doesn't get better than that.

[aboutfkntime]

You're painting me as a Golovkin fan when that is far from the truth, I'm a boxing fan who's been watching boxing since the Nigel benn days so probably when u were in nappies bruh, I never denied that golovkin had question marks on his career, I said canelo does and as he's having an ATG sorta career right now having that blot on his resume and having many boxing analysts and observers thinking he didn't win either of those fights then it would be in his best interests to take the trilogy, kid.

if you were a real boxing fan you would be smart enough to know a hypejob from the real deal... but you clearly are not

I would just about bet my life that you were one of those shltheads who swore that Canelo would never fight Golovkin

how did that work out for ya ?

there are plenty of butthurt casuals crying about that fight, you are just one of them... seen it all before

go cry somewhere else idiot




Funny-Crying-Baby-Face-Photo.jpg

[aboutfkntime]

And at what point did I praise Golovkin? Now you're just making s**t up cos again your way to invested in nelo. Golovkins nowhere near my favourite fighter, and he never will be, and I was routing for nelo in the first until that utterly atrocious judging made me route for Golovkin in the second. Out of the two of them though I find nelo a way better watch and I've stated many times nelo would win the trilogy at this point, so all your points are clearly from an emotional standpoint and that's when your s**t fall apart. I've never been one to score a fight for someone I like better, if that was the case chisora would only have 3 losses right now, I score fights round by round on clean punch output, aggression and effective defense not by who I like best u fkn child

if you genuinely use that criteria, and you still think Golovkin won the rematch... then you are just one of those shlthead casuals who has no idea what he is watching

oh... don't forget ring generalship willya... another one of the 3 official scoring criteria that clearly favored Canelo in that fight

stop blubbering kid, your panties are showing






...

[I have no ears]

if you genuinely use that criteria, and you still think Golovkin won the rematch... then you are just one of those shlthead casuals who has no idea what he is watching

oh... don't forget ring generalship willya... another one of the 3 official scoring criteria that clearly favored Canelo in that fight

stop blubbering kid, your panties are showing






...

I didn't need to mention ring generalship as in my opinion that accounts to everything else I use for scoring put together. All I'm hearing is "you're a golovkin fan", not sure how many times I can state this but I have never ever been ggg fan, I've watched many of his fights as again I'm a boxing fan but I can say the same about canelo and I've watched many more nelo fights. If u let you're emotions get the better of u in this, u end up sending posts like yours, it's okay though, you've only been exposed to me, I'm sure no-one else has read your completely emotional pro canelo outbursts, child.

[aboutfkntime]

I didn't need to mention ring generalship as in my opinion that accounts to everything else I use for scoring put together. All I'm hearing is "you're a golovkin fan", not sure how many times I can state this but I have never ever been ggg fan, I've watched many of his fights as again I'm a boxing fan but I can say the same about canelo and I've watched many more nelo fights. If u let you're emotions get the better of u in this, u end up sending posts like yours, it's okay though, you've only been exposed to me, I'm sure no-one else has read your completely emotional pro canelo outbursts, child.

that is total fkn bullshlt, how ridiculous... FACT: you have no idea what ring generalship is loooooool

why would you log onto a boxing website and write that nonsense?

also, the other criteria you gave was bullshlt... you have no idea how to score a fight you muppet

this, is bullshlt... "clean punch output"

FACT: output has nothing to do with scoring a professional boxing match

the criteria is... clean hard punching... the punches must be clean, and meaningful... output, or volume, has nothing to do with it... judges score on the quality of punching, not the volume... unless it lands clean, and is meaningful, the judges totally ignore it... which is why compubox is totally irrelevant when it comes to judging a fight

this is also bullshlt... "aggression and effective defense"
.
the official scoring criteria in a professional boxing match is... effective aggression... which is why blindly scoring for the guy moving forward is the land of the casual-fan idiot, which is what you clowns did in the first fight... that is why knowledgeable observers (like the judges and numerous websites) scored that fight a draw, and ignorant ****heads are running around insisting that Golovkin won easy... you are exposing yourself son... aggression must be effective, it requires skills discipline and an effective gameplan

defense speaks for itself... and I will leave you to figure out what ring generalship is

how you could insist that you scored the rematch for Golovkin because of the official criteria is frankly absurd, which is why Able Sanchez admitted that Golovkin did not win that fight... the effective aggressor was Canelo, he backed Golovkin up for most of that fight... at times he walked Golovkin down, making him miss and then making him pay... and he clearly landed the better punches, Jabkin had no answer for Canelo's punching... which is why Able Sanchez stated after the fight that he wanted Golovkin to fight Canelo... Sanchez said that is what they worked on, but Golovkin could not get his game going because Canelo was too sharp

Canelo defense was MUCH better than Jabkin, who missed OVER 1000 PUNCHES in those fights LMAO.. you are ridiculous if you think Golovkin defense is anywhere near as good as Canelo's, he is on a different level

Golovkin had a gameplan, and his gameplan was suited to his style... Abel Sanchez also admitted that immediately after that fight... Golovkin could not get his gameplan going, and he could not fight to his style... no pipe-bursting pressure... none of that trademark body-work... none of that heavy-handed work on the ropes... when he got Canelo on the ropes Golovkin was timid, he stood off Canelo and would not commit because the red kids counter-punching was too sharp...

there, I gave you a hint what ring generalship is... you can go study up, and figure out the rest for yourself LMAO

and NO, you muppet... I do not give a fcuk about Clenelo, so don't start that shlt with me you tool... and NO, he is not the best fighter in the world... I had him ranked 3rd until recently, now I have him ranked #2

you are out of your depth in this conversation, just like Golovkin was in the rematch






...

[KillaMane26]

Lmfao...... GGG like a guy still hanging on to his ex while she moved on.

[I have no ears]

that is total fkn bullshlt, how ridiculous... FACT: you have no idea what ring generalship is loooooool

why would you log onto a boxing website and write that nonsense?

also, the other criteria you gave was bullshlt... you have no idea how to score a fight you muppet

this, is bullshlt... "clean punch output"

FACT: output has nothing to do with scoring a professional boxing match

the criteria is... clean hard punching... the punches must be clean, and meaningful... output, or volume, has nothing to do with it... judges score on the quality of punching, not the volume... unless it lands clean, and is meaningful, the judges totally ignore it... which is why compubox is totally irrelevant when it comes to judging a fight

this is also bullshlt... "aggression and effective defense"
.
the official scoring criteria in a professional boxing match is... effective aggression... which is why blindly scoring for the guy moving forward is the land of the casual-fan idiot, which is what you clowns did in the first fight... that is why knowledgeable observers (like the judges and numerous websites) scored that fight a draw, and ignorant ****heads are running around insisting that Golovkin won easy... you are exposing yourself son... aggression must be effective, it requires skills discipline and an effective gameplan

defense speaks for itself... and I will leave you to figure out what ring generalship is

how you could insist that you scored the rematch for Golovkin because of the official criteria is frankly absurd, which is why Able Sanchez admitted that Golovkin did not win that fight... the effective aggressor was Canelo, he backed Golovkin up for most of that fight... at times he walked Golovkin down, making him miss and then making him pay... and he clearly landed the better punches, Jabkin had no answer for Canelo's punching... which is why Able Sanchez stated after the fight that he wanted Golovkin to fight Canelo... Sanchez said that is what they worked on, but Golovkin could not get his game going because Canelo was too sharp

Canelo defense was MUCH better than Jabkin, who missed OVER 1000 PUNCHES in those fights LMAO.. you are ridiculous if you think Golovkin defense is anywhere near as good as Canelo's, he is on a different level

Golovkin had a gameplan, and his gameplan was suited to his style... Abel Sanchez also admitted that immediately after that fight... Golovkin could not get his gameplan going, and he could not fight to his style... no pipe-bursting pressure... none of that trademark body-work... none of that heavy-handed work on the ropes... when he got Canelo on the ropes Golovkin was timid, he stood off Canelo and would not commit because the red kids counter-punching was too sharp...

there, I gave you a hint what ring generalship is... you can go study up, and figure out the rest for yourself LMAO

and NO, you muppet... I do not give a fcuk about Clenelo, so don't start that shlt with me you tool... and NO, he is not the best fighter in the world... I had him ranked 3rd until recently, now I have him ranked #2

you are out of your depth in this conversation, just like Golovkin was in the rematch






...

This term ring generalship means a boxer who controls the action and puts himself in position to land clean punches, or using a strategy to make his opponent fight his fight... How is that not an amalgamation of aggression, defense and clean punches? And your punches can be blocked or not land clean, yet u can throw more punches than your opponent overall, so clean punch output is a pretty good base for scoring fights, it's the same as clean punches but if both fighters are having success at connecting, then the clean punches can become critical, hence clean punch output. And yes aggression must be effective, but everything has to be effective, your punches, your aggression and you're defense u fkn ret**d. I stated everything needed to score a fight, and u twisted it and put everything in bold like a d**khead, then proceeded to say everything I said like u somehow proved a point, the cringe is too strong in u, u think cos u and your bro once put gloves on and tentatively sparred for 5mins til obviously u got ktfo makes u the best authority to speak about it.. Hahaha. And who gives a f who u think is p4p? It's like u think your important or something. Why would anyone care what your opinion on that is, just cos u pretend to not have nelo at #1, only for the sake of this argument is transparent to everyone, read everything u have posted in this exchange, u sound like a crazy Stan for a certain red headed boxer and that's what makes u a bad authority on all of this, the dunning Kruger effect is real. Also u can state a few Mexican websites that thought nelo won but many more websites, journalists, analysts and observers all thought Golovkin won, who's gonna be the the most trusted? U and a few blatantly bias websites or everyone else and their dog ffs? Absolute ******ity on your part, I wouldn't expect anything less though at this point. The guys that have the superiority complex are the ones that know the least, and the ones that talk the loudest most often know nothing and your bold font speaks volumes. The fact I've stated many times that nelo would win the trilogy and I've agreed the second fight was close as f, should be enough to make u not react in a such an emotional way, and talk in a constructive way, even with your nelo fanboy standpoint, but the fact I've made u freakout by pointing out something that most people believe is true makes your claim not to be in-love with nelo just look like pure fantasy, but keep going it's making my day watching u flipping out about it

[aboutfkntime]

This term ring generalship means a boxer who controls the action and puts himself in position to land clean punches, or using a strategy to make his opponent fight his fight... How is that not an amalgamation of aggression, defense and clean punches? And your punches can be blocked or not land clean, yet u can throw more punches than your opponent overall, so clean punch output is a pretty good base for scoring fights, it's the same as clean punches but if both fighters are having success at connecting, then the clean punches can become critical, hence clean punch output. And yes aggression must be effective, but everything has to be effective, your punches, your aggression and you're defense u fkn ret**d. I stated everything needed to score a fight, and u twisted it and put everything in bold like a d**khead, then proceeded to say everything I said like u somehow proved a point, the cringe is too strong in u, u think cos u and your bro once put gloves on and tentatively sparred for 5mins til obviously u got ktfo makes u the best authority to speak about it.. Hahaha. And who gives a f who u think is p4p? It's like u think your important or something. Why would anyone care what your opinion on that is, just cos u pretend to not have nelo at #1, only for the sake of this argument is transparent to everyone, read everything u have posted in this exchange, u sound like a crazy Stan for a certain red headed boxer and that's what makes u a bad authority on all of this, the dunning Kruger effect is real. Also u can state a few Mexican websites that thought nelo won but many more websites, journalists, analysts and observers all thought Golovkin won, who's gonna be the the most trusted? U and a few blatantly bias websites or everyone else and their dog ffs? Absolute ******ity on your part, I wouldn't expect anything less though at this point. The guys that have the superiority complex are the ones that know the least, and the ones that talk the loudest most often know nothing and your bold font speaks volumes. The fact I've stated many times that nelo would win the trilogy and I've agreed the second fight was close as f, should be enough to make u not react in a such an emotional way, and talk in a constructive way, even with your nelo fanboy standpoint, but the fact I've made u freakout by pointing out something that most people believe is true makes your claim not to be in-love with nelo just look like pure fantasy, but keep going it's making my day watching u flipping out about it

kid, you googled that... and I can prove it...

how is "using a strategy to make his opponent fight his fight" covered by... effective aggression, clean punching, defense... ?

you just exposed yourself again

you are out of your depth kid... you are just another shlthead casual-fan who thinks that "Golovkin won easy" LMAO

ring generalship is also... adapting, taking away your opponents strengths, and out-thinking your opponent... none of which are covered by... effective aggression, clean punching, defense... so you are woefully ignorant for excluding it

you are just another shlthead casual, you little tosser lol

FACT: Hypekin had two chances to beat Canelo, but he failed

FACT: Hypekin has continued to use the same timid opponent selection policy since the first Canelo fight, that he used for his entire career... which is, take the path of least resistance

Golovkin has a poor resume, and does not have a signature win or career-defining fight... but, yea... you keep riding the OBVIOUS hypejob, and criticizing the obvious ace

Canelo spanked your hypejob, and took all his titles... DEAL WITH IT, you little crybaby !!

and learn about this sport before you open your ****-warmer... you are fooling nobody kid






Funny-Crying-Baby-Face-Photo.jpg

[aboutfkntime]

...






anyone who insists that they score using the official criteria... clean hard punching, effective aggression, defense, and ring generalship... and yet somehow thinks that Golovkin won the rematch... is just a shlthead, wtf???

what that rematch proved... is that Canelo is better than Golovkin in ALL of those departments... EVERY... SINGLE... ONE... he is also faster, sharper, has better skills, and is a much more well-rounded fighter

wtf do you clowns see when you watch a fight... you clearly only watch one fighter, and cannot understand how a fight unfolds

morons






...