whos better skilled offensively,jmm or floyd?
Collapse
-
Comment
-
[QUOTE=Pullcounter;6011404]
imho, floyd is a great fighter, but he lately has not thrown combos, hence, JMM is the better combo thrower.
QUOTE]
the question is who is better offensively not who throws better combos and bein that floyd can pot shot, throw combos, infight with you, counter punch you makes floyd the better offensive fighter to meComment
-
so any fighter who throws a bunch of combinations but gets hit a bunch of times in the process makes them a great offensive fighter?that just makes you an offensive fighter not a great offensive fighter.Comment
-
-
nonononononononon.... floyd should not fight calderon even if its worth $30 million.
imho, floyd is a great fighter, but he lately has not thrown combos, hence, JMM is the better combo thrower.
they are both close offensively and defensively, the difference is that jmm is much more offensive minded while floyd is much more defensive minded.
because jmm opens up, while floyd does not.
yeah, floyd cherrypicks the most lucrative fights.Comment
-
just b/c a guy is more "entertaining" by the way he fights, doesn't make him a better offensive fighter....
****, kelly pavlik has a devastating KO percentage....it can be argued, he's one of the best offensively skilled fighters in boxing.Comment
-
floyd is better period. the guys he fights can hit him back, so basically his fights are one-sided ass whoopings.....
just b/c a guy is more "entertaining" by the way he fights, doesn't make him a better offensive fighter....
****, kelly pavlik has a devastating KO percentage....it can be argued, he's one of the best offensively skilled fighters in boxing.Comment
Comment