Comments Thread For: Joshua vs. Usyk Will Have a Rematch Clause, Says Hearn

[Cortez]

But Eddie what's stopping usyk just walking away from the rematch clause, I mean you didn't even know rematch clauses were solid and binding , when you kept announcement fury v AJ week after week

You had no idea

[DougalDylan]

Don't joke Fury was joking Wilder Fury III may have another rematch clause and off course the Knowacki fight is a rematch Helenius got caught with that clause is on the undercard.

Will the rematch have a rematch clause?

[Corelone]

Eddy rematch clauses are different than any I've ever seen before. He'll take a victory and turn it into a ball and chain. This claus makes Eddy the master and shot caller, it hardly benefits the winner. I understand people want a superman to run roughshod over the rules and red tape to get things done, but that's your superman, not mine. To me he's just a law breaker.

[champion4ever]

Does Joshua really needs a rematch clause for Usyk? I mean he is going to be a heavy betting favorite heading into the fight.

[Corelone]

If rematch clauses are so common, where are they? Can somebody show me anybody else enforcing a rematch claus? I'll wait.

[KTFOKING]

He was forced to sign nothing. He could have chosen to go to purse bid. Rematch clauses are standard and have been for a long time. The champ gives them more money for a rematch clause. Anything can happen in a fight, if the challenger is the better fighter he will beat the champ in the rematch too.

Rematch clauses are standard for A-sides, but rarely in mandatory fights. But Usky agreed to sign the deal so it is what it is. He also gets a return fight with Matchroom even if he loses for what I'm assuming is for great money so if he's not complaining? I'm not complaining.......

[greeneye99]

Eddy rematch clauses are different than any I've ever seen before. He'll take a victory and turn it into a ball and chain. This claus makes Eddy the master and shot caller, it hardly benefits the winner. I understand people want a superman to run roughshod over the rules and red tape to get things done, but that's your superman, not mine. To me he's just a law breaker.

What are you on about?
The Winner gets paid way more than he's ever made
Ask Andy Ruiz

[greeneye99]

You'll still read all the articles involving him and post about him though lol.

Regarding the rematch, it's just the smart thing to do if possible. A mandatory challenger doesn't have to accept it. If a fighter vacates rather than fight without a rematch clause, I wouldn't respect that though.

You're responding to a Hater
Lololololol
This guy is the resident Eddie Hearn Troll
He eats sleeps everything Matchroom

[greeneye99]

If rematch clauses are so common, where are they? Can somebody show me anybody else enforcing a rematch claus? I'll wait.

Floyd Mayweather had Rematch clauses in all his Fights

[greeneye99]

Not surprised by this not do I think it’s a big deal. If Usyk wins the rematch means he makes bigger money from the revenge angle and takes a bigger share of the fight purse pot. Obviously he doesn’t mind or care so much ado about nothing methinks. I love a good slagging off of Hearn like the next masculine man but he isn’t in the wrong here. His fans are still geeks though…..

Wow
I'm impressed
You giving Hearn props
At least you're being fair..wish your comrade Champion4ever would do the same