Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Joshua vs. Usyk Will Have a Rematch Clause, Says Hearn

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Originally posted by Nash out View Post
    We all know that WAR Chisora smoked Usyk. He should be back on that PPV fighting Joshua, and the fact that WAR was robbed again against the New Zealand runner, was sad to see for the ATG. But as Bernard Hopkins once said, "the fans are the judges."
    Lol, If Del Boy would of had his hand raised that night with Usyk, Joshua wouldn’t of even spoke to fury, we would have Joshua - chisora on PPV. I can’t believe you wanted that rubbish. Come on man, you really wanted to see chisora vs aj? You are Wildin

    you say he “smoked” Usyk, but last I remembered both guys ended the fight upright and it went to points? I don’t think anybody got smoked buddy, but hey, who am I to tell an uneducated casual fan about boxing! I am just a moron!!
    Last edited by GucciGod; 06-16-2021, 04:46 AM.
    !-1 !-1 likes this.

    Comment


    • #12
      Originally posted by Robbie Barrett View Post

      He was forced to sign nothing. He could have chosen to go to purse bid. Rematch clauses are standard and have been for a long time. The champ gives them more money for a rematch clause. Anything can happen in a fight, if the challenger is the better fighter he will beat the champ in the rematch too.
      Have you ever heard of sarcasm? Geez
      BangEM BangEM Clegg Clegg like this.

      Comment


      • #13
        Originally posted by GucciGod View Post

        Lol, If Del Boy would of had his hand raised that night with Usyk, Joshua wouldn’t of even spoke to fury, we would have Joshua - chisora on PPV. I can’t believe you wanted that rubbish. Come on man, you really wanted to see chisora vs aj? You are Wildin

        you say he “smoked” Usyk, but last I remembered both guys ended the fight upright and it went to points? I don’t think anybody got smoked buddy, but hey, who am I to tell an uneducated casual fan about boxing! I am just a moron!!
        In all seriousness, I had Usyk winning, but I gave Chisora 4-5 rounds, and was not really too impressed with Usyk. As far as Chisora goes I'd like to see him vs Babic.
        GucciGod GucciGod likes this.

        Comment


        • #14
          Originally posted by James Hunt View Post

          Have you ever heard of sarcasm? Geez
          How does one detect sarcasm from text?

          Comment


          • #15
            Everyone ragging Hearn for this, but pretty much all big title fights have rematch clauses. Especially when there’s so much money in it. Like Usyk doesn’t want two huge money fights with AJ?

            Comment


            • #16
              People need to get their head around the fact that it's the mandatory challenger who sells the rematch clause.

              Blame Usyk.
              KP1 KP1 likes this.

              Comment


              • #17
                Originally posted by Robbie Barrett View Post

                How does one detect sarcasm from text?
                Who signs a valid contract with a gunpoint?

                btw, if you plan to continue responding to anyone you don't agree with or you think you don't agree with, you gonna get crazy before you reach 15.
                leeroy84 leeroy84 likes this.

                Comment


                • #18
                  Re-match clause for a mandatory defence smh. Hearn does this all the time.

                  I'm glad he's going to DeadZone so we don't have to suffer all the promotion he used to get for his shows targeted at casuals with Sky's marketing machine. Good riddance.

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    Originally posted by Toffee View Post
                    People need to get their head around the fact that it's the mandatory challenger who sells the rematch clause.

                    Blame Usyk.

                    It’s a chance to go off on Hearn, logic goes out the window.

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      Originally posted by !-1 View Post
                      Re-match clause for a mandatory defence smh. Hearn does this all the time.

                      I'm glad he's going to DeadZone so we don't have to suffer all the promotion he used to get for his shows targeted at casuals with Sky's marketing machine. Good riddance.
                      You'll still read all the articles involving him and post about him though lol.

                      Regarding the rematch, it's just the smart thing to do if possible. A mandatory challenger doesn't have to accept it. If a fighter vacates rather than fight without a rematch clause, I wouldn't respect that though.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP