VERY SAD NEWS!!! FLOYD MAYWEATHER TEST£D POSlTlVE FOR BANN£D SUBSTANCE SAYS MICHAEL HUNTER

[champion4ever]

wow a very sad news to floyd fans.

Now how does the fuck he knows?

[Nash out]

Michael Hunter just needs to stick to running from Hrgovic. He's very good at that.

[elfag]

Reading this thread I learned that Poochiao lost to a man with T/E ratios of an 83 year old.

[champion4ever]

Money May should sue his ass but he would relish in the attention. The man is obviously clout chasing Floyd. Thank God he has a very small voice because nobody has ever heard of this loser outside of boxing fans. So he has obvious credibility issues. He's too small of a fish to try to swim with Floyd.

[The Big Dunn]

Who cares if Manny was ranked higher than Hearns, Hearns was prime, undefeated, never been stopped and was knocking out everybody. Hearns is top 5 all time and Srl stopped him @ ww wtf are you talking about.

Hearns and Srl were both in their prime fighting for undisputed ww 1 loss between them, that win helped to put Srl, along with prime Duran, prime Benitez, and a whole host of b-listers Floyd's pops included, squarely behind Srr @ ww and top ten all time great. It don't get no better than that.
In comparison Floyd was past prime, Manny was even further past prime and had been ko'd and Floyd couldn't even get a ko.

Hagler was not waay past prime. He was undisputed @ mw and hadn't lost in 10+ years. Had been in wars with Hearns and Mugabi but nowhere near coming close to being stopped or outpointed. Manny had been knocked out cold already.

Where is your precious Floyd? 50-0 and still Top 30 all time at best and why. Because he wanted low risk high reward fights. Everybody good he beat was past their prime and no excuse in the world from you or any other Floyd Boy is gonna change that.

hearns is not a top 5 ATG.


prime Duran was LW, not ww.

it was haglers last fight out of 66. Of course he was way past prime. The mugabi fight showed that.

you’re an absolute joke.

[djtmal]

hearns is not a top 5 ATG.


prime Duran was LW, not ww.

prime Duran was LW, not ww.
you’re an absolute joke.

hearns is not a top 5 ATG.

You'd like to think Hearns isn't top 5 and you can't dispute he was prime undefeated @ ww and was stopping fighters. You look crazy trying to compare a past prime Manny in comparison.

prime Duran was LW, not ww.

Duran had many fights @ ww before Srl and was past his prime when he beat a prime Srl yeah ok with 1 loss? He went on to beat jmw's, mw's smw's. Unlike lw Marquez who your boy pulled up two divisions in one fight. That rematch win cemented Ray Leonard with the all time greats @ ww man you need to do some more research.

it was haglers last fight out of 66. Of course he was way past prime. The mugabi fight showed that.

Oh and Manny wasn't way past prime with 64 fights and a brutal ko?

Naw dude way past prime is Manny who had been in wars and was brutally stopped. Hagler hadn't lost in 12 years never was stopped and only retired because Srl welched on a rematch.

I think you need to change the batteries on your utility belt for Floyd

[hugh grant]

stop with the home advantage BS. Both guys had many fights in Las Vegas. The fight wasn’t close and didn’t warrant a rematch.

There was no controversy. No one is turning a blind eye to anything. You’re just a sore loser that refuses to give a guy credit when you’re wrong ( see the post you tried to delete).

So instead you create fake controversy that no one thinks is valid s.

The Floyd v pac fight was competitive, and for you to deny that is narcisistic. Barrera v pac wasn't close but Pac gave rematch. Stop making rules up that first fights have to be close scorecard wise to warrant rematches. Are you saying Floyd fights Are boring so nobody wanted to see a rematch?
There was too much controversy and for you to deny everyone else opinion is narcissistic yet again.
Ok, don't rematch Pac then but don't then think you'll get much credit for win. I'm sure horn and Bradley get credit for their win over pac just like Floyd does. But how much is queztionable. And it's not as much as you hope it is.

[sicko]

You guys got some serious growing up to do...40+ year old Children just clinging on any and everything said and posted negative about someone you've made clear on this forum that you HATE

So Ridiculous!

[The Big Dunn]

hearns is not a top 5 ATG.

You'd like to think Hearns isn't top 5 and you can't dispute he was prime undefeated @ ww and was stopping fighters. You look crazy trying to compare a past prime Manny in comparison.

prime Duran was LW, not ww.

Duran had many fights @ ww before Srl and was past his prime when he beat a prime Srl yeah ok with 1 loss? He went on to beat jmw's, mw's smw's. Unlike lw Marquez who your boy pulled up two divisions in one fight. That rematch win cemented Ray Leonard with the all time greats @ ww man you need to do some more research.

it was haglers last fight out of 66. Of course he was way past prime. The mugabi fight showed that.

Oh and Manny wasn't way past prime with 64 fights and a brutal ko?

Naw dude way past prime is Manny who had been in wars and was brutally stopped. Hagler hadn't lost in 12 years never was stopped and only retired because Srl welched on a rematch.

I think you need to change the batteries on your utility belt for Floyd

All I posted was manny was ranked ahead of him p4p, which is a fact. You can’t say otherwise. hearns is no where near a top 5 ATG. If you’re arguing he is a top 5 at ww all time, ok that’s fair.

I posted prime Duran was LW and not ww. That is also a fact. Duran vacated the LW title and went up 12 lbs to fight Ray. Jmm went up 11 lbs to fight Floyd. Ray lost. Floyd didn’t lose.

You tried to argue hagler was prime when he clearly wasn’t. I’ve never posted Manny was prime.

I posted these things to show how you’re opinions are an absolute joke and how you shift standards depending on if it’s Floyd or not.

The ko was on manny. He refused $40 mil. You just mentioned durans wins that took place after a brutal ko to hearns yet you use it as an excuse for manny, your favorite boxer.

you’re an absolute joke who shifts standards just to take away from Floyd.

[The Big Dunn]

The Floyd v pac fight was competitive, and for you to deny that is narcisistic. Barrera v pac wasn't close but Pac gave rematch. Stop making rules up that first fights have to be close scorecard wise to warrant rematches. Are you saying Floyd fights Are boring so nobody wanted to see a rematch?
There was too much controversy and for you to deny everyone else opinion is narcissistic yet again.
Ok, don't rematch Pac then but don't then think you'll get much credit for win. I'm sure horn and Bradley get credit for their win over pac just like Floyd does. But how much is queztionable. And it's not as much as you hope it is.

Bradley was a robbery. Horn was close. Floyd over manny wasnt.

you’re begging for a rematch hoping manny can land something lucky and win.

keep begging.