Has there been any champion that refused or didn't want a rematch clause because they were so confident they wouldn't lose?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Rematch clause not needed.
Collapse
-
Originally posted by 15round View PostHas there been any champion that refused or didn't want a rematch clause because they were so confident they wouldn't lose?
Zerafa refused a rematch clause for Horn.
Crawford refused a rematch clause for Horn.
Manny had a rematch clause for Horn, but didn't call it in (that counts).
Fairly certain Floyd refused a rematch clause for Cotto.
Happens a lot.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by revelated View PostManny had a rematch clause for Horn, but didn't call it in (that counts).Combat Talk Radio likes this.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
This is obviously directed at Anthony Joshua. Is this definitely the sticking point or is this just being run hard on the forum for saltiness purposes?
If this is the real reason then the obligation for a mandatory low split is surely thrown out of the window as it would be a change to standard mandatory contract types and I wouldn’t blame Usyk if he started throwing his own demands in there, especially a better split of the money.
Comment
-
If you were the champion and the A side, what would you do? Every top fighter thinks they will win. It's the manager's job to protect their interests.
I don't see it as that big a deal. If you're a challenger and don't want a rematch then work your way to mandatory and turn down the extra money.
It's challengers that sell off the rematch clause, not champions.
Comment
-
Originally posted by revelated View Post
Besides Loma?
Zerafa refused a rematch clause for Horn.
Crawford refused a rematch clause for Horn.
Manny had a rematch clause for Horn, but didn't call it in (that counts).
Fairly certain Floyd refused a rematch clause for Cotto.
Happens a lot.
Comment
-
Comment
Comment