Malignaggi said nothing controversial. Bring him back
Collapse
-
-
So what did you make of Haney's comment, that he was responding to?Comment
-
Man I would love to meet you in person, so I can stoop down to the 5'3 inches you probably are, and slap the fu.cking taste out of your worthless mouthwell that big tard who said covid is a hoax and got 600 thousand people killed will be back and welcomed with open arms so why cant paulie come back? is there maybe a fox boxing channel he can be on where paulie and some hot blonde women talk about how black and brown people are taking over boxing and how we must stop themComment
-
And some people, like you, are absolutely awful at analyzing any situation that involves race. You can't look at stuff logically, always emotionally.
That's not true at all. Alan Minter made the same comments before figuring Marvin Hagler. If didn't affect his career at all. Kovalev called a black person a monkey and used the N word and it didn't even make a dent in the news. Didn't hurt his career either.
Malignaggi went as far to say racism and oppression against black people never existed in this century. He also tried to downplay the deaths of George Floyd and Ahmaud Arbery. It wasn't just his comments about African American fighters.
But the thread starter is a racist himself so it's not shocking that he didn't have a problem with the comments. Funny how he was offended earlier when someone questioned the customs of Saudi Arabia. Some people like to pick and choose what's offensive based on how it affects them.
Alan Minter's comments were 40!!!! years ago lol. He immediately tried to backtrack as well, and say he meant 'that black man' instead of what he probably said. Regardless, it was 40 years ago, and he tried to walk it back to make the comment look less incendiary.
Kovalev is probably somewhat racist but he played the 'I didn't understand the terminology, I'm Russian' angle, and apologized about the Stevenson/monkey shirt. Never saw any evidence of him using the Nword either. Probably does use but not so publicly.
Whereas there is no confusion about what Haney said or meant. It's fine, but comparing it to those situations is low IQ. He didn't even issue any type of apology, and wasn't really forced to lol. Because, what can he really say anyway. He made his point.
Comment
-
What does a study from 92-14 have to do with the attacks we've all seen on the news over the past year or so, where literally every assailant is black? lol
That's a lie.
One recent study has provided the justification for the claim that non-whites where the majority of perpetrators of Asian-American hate crimes. The study was published in the American Journal of Criminal Justice in January, and it was based on data from 1992-2014. But the study clearly indicates that the iden****** of the perpetrators of hate crimes against Asian-Americans are overwhelmingly white: 74.6 percent of these crimes are committed by white assailants. Importantly, according to the methodology in the study, there is a ~20-fold difference in the cases of hate crimes reported against African-Americans (5,463) compared to Asian-Americans (329), which explains the large difference in percentage of non-white assailants by race.
https://www.newsweek.com/stop-blamin...pinion-1577887
And you call that a recent study. gtfoh JoeComment
-
What didn't you understand from this comment:
"Black people are overrepresented by percent of violent crimes perpetuated on Asians coming in at 27.5% while whites are at 24% and that's a fact."
Like why are you digging this hole Joe. Not to mention that whites outnumber blacks like 5 to 1 in the US so by those percentages it's not even a comparison between black/white/Asian violence etc
Comment
-
Again the topic was attacks on Asians. The accusation was that Asians are MOSTLY getting attacked by black people which has been proven false. Nothing you said here changes that. You're deflecting to other topics because you have nothing to refute what I posted.
What didn't you understand from this comment:
"Black people are overrepresented by percent of violent crimes perpetuated on Asians coming in at 27.5% while whites are at 24% and that's a fact."
Like why are you digging this hole Joe. Not to mention that whites outnumber blacks like 5 to 1 in the US so by those percentages it's not even a comparison between black/white/Asian violence etc
I know my post triggered because you quoted me three times already lol. Give it up. Your white nationalist agenda won't work with me.Comment
-
Just stop dude. I don't mind you sticking up for your own but at least make some damn sense man.
Again the topic was attacks on Asians. The accusation was that Asians are MOSTLY getting attacked by black people which has been proven false. Nothing you said here changes that. You're deflecting to other topics because you have nothing to refute what I posted.
I know my post triggered because you quoted me three times already lol. Give it up. Your white nationalist agenda won't work with me.
And I quoted you 3 times because you can't MQ anymore and all I do on this site is read through some threads and respond to any comments that stand out.Comment
-
*** Malignaggi, listening to him speak is annoying as ***. I don’t miss him one bit and I hope they never bring him back.Comment
-
Comment
Comment