Comments Thread For: Time For Boxing To Take Itself Seriously

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BIGPOPPAPUMP
    Franchise Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Sep 2003
    • 46539
    • 2,259
    • 334
    • 5,493,285

    #1

    Comments Thread For: Time For Boxing To Take Itself Seriously

    By Tris Dixon - The business of boxing is convoluted, murky, confusing and sometimes downright unethical. Its chaotic nature means things are never straightforward, when it seems they should be, and the sport's regularly appearing loopholes frequently cause all kinds of carnage.
    [Click Here To Read More]
  • BodyBagz
    The Stuff Of Nightmares
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Apr 2020
    • 29780
    • 6,043
    • 6,437
    • 108,454

    #2
    Been this way for a while.

    Promoters and networks run the sport.

    Comment

    • ShoulderRoll
      Join The Great Resist
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Oct 2009
      • 56013
      • 10,060
      • 5,027
      • 763,445

      #3
      There was a rematch clause in the contract for Fury vs Wilder II.

      It is what it is, people need to stop crying that Fury is being forced to live up to what he signed.

      Comment

      • Plick647
        Interim Champion
        Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
        • Mar 2018
        • 938
        • 189
        • 435
        • 17,270

        #4
        was boxing ALWAYS like this? been a fan since before Mike Tyson was champ, and the problems then were (mostly) revolving around Don King...

        Comment

        • BodyBagz
          The Stuff Of Nightmares
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Apr 2020
          • 29780
          • 6,043
          • 6,437
          • 108,454

          #5
          Originally posted by Plick647
          was boxing ALWAYS like this? been a fan since before Mike Tyson was champ, and the problems then were (mostly) revolving around Don King...
          Boxing was built on corruption dating back to the early days.

          Back then it was the mob.

          Comment

          • Ray*
            Be safe!!!
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Jul 2005
            • 44867
            • 1,654
            • 1,608
            • 558,890

            #6
            Originally posted by ShoulderRoll
            There was a rematch clause in the contract for Fury vs Wilder II.

            It is what it is, people need to stop crying that Fury is being forced to live up to what he signed.
            Agreed… Funny how the same people were asking Andy Ruiz to ignore his signed contractual rematch when he beat Joshua.

            If a contract is valid then you honour it. Rahman tried to do the same thing, not sure why boxing is like that. With Fury and Wilder I hope it’s another lesson in activating your rematch clause and communicating, not just staying silent for almost a year.

            Comment

            • Tonyu
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • May 2012
              • 1326
              • 293
              • 71
              • 13,753

              #7
              The problem is Hearn is now his own worse enemy. Everytime he sets a fight for his fighters his adding rematch clauses incase his fighter loses. Even the Fury v Joshua fight has to be a 2 fight deal putting the Heavyweight Division on hold for a whole year. Fighters these days only fight twice a year and it's not fair on the other fighters like Joyce and Ussyk who are Already in their mid thirties. Fury and Wilder have done the same and it's come up and bitten Hearn in the preverbial butt. The only way to stop this is all the Alphabet bodies need to put a rule in if you lose a title shot then you need to win 2 more fights before getting another shot at the title otherwise this will become the norm.

              Comment

              • ThatDude44
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Mar 2013
                • 3484
                • 175
                • 180
                • 28,546

                #8
                Fury is honoring a contract that he signed. He was evidently over extending himself by signing for a 3rd fight with Wilder THEN agreeing to 2 fights with Joshua and getting you all hyped up with all these empty promises. It doesn't work like that. I saw this coming especially when he didn't fight his tune up in December.

                Comment

                • Dle
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Aug 2013
                  • 2093
                  • 102
                  • 0
                  • 18,235

                  #9
                  What’s the problem? Why shouldn’t fury fight wilder. They signed the contract for a rematch. Nobody saw COVID coming. Wilder gave fury a rematch when he didn’t have to. If Ruiz ducked Joshua after beating him for those belts we say it’s unfair. The issue at hand is can fury do it again?

                  Comment

                  • DougalDylan
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Jul 2017
                    • 2275
                    • 508
                    • 30
                    • 29,422

                    #10
                    "Taylor and Jose Ramirez didn't have a UK broadcaster" - didn't have a UK broadcaster because Arum doesn't promote in the UK. His fights will go out 2-4am in the morning to a non rebuilt fan base with no UK interest in the undercard asking ppv and you think it that get Sky or BT interested.

                    Taylor is being fattened to get beat by Crawford. His next fight should be in Scotland.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP