Why no calls for a rematch?

[kushking]

Just saying,imho this was foty contender,& I picked Ramirez to get the upset,but thought the cards were right on pt within moe.(I think its meaningless that Taylor would've lost by 1 rd rd my card if not for the 2 kds,which made him win by 1 pt on my card or a draw would've been fair,as were cards,then again I scored him v Postal to be almost identical,Where the kd was the difference, albeit 1 instead of 2(I know its impossible for Postol not to have won a few rds minimum)

But I thought immediately why should Taylor ******ly go for Bud who brings no more money than Ramirez in rematch,& that is again winnable unlike Bud imo.

[Beercules]

He is AMERICAN

[KTFOKING]

I mean if we get a rematch? Cool, but Taylor clearly won this fight so that's why there is no call for a rematch.

[deathofaclown]

It was a very good fight, I’m sure we would all watch it again but everyone clamouring for a rematch instantly kind of takes the enjoyment away of seeing a boxer hold every belt and the rare occasion we see a definite number 1 in an undisputed fight.

so I think people are just enjoying that moment, we don’t get it enough in boxing.

[kushking]

He is AMERICAN

From what I can tell Ramirez is a bigger gate draw than Bud(basing that on the fact this fight had tickets more expensive than Canelo v ggg(which were most I've seen besides maybe Floyd),& I've never seen Buds tickets to be anywhere near so expensive. Including his undisputed fight.)

[Nash out]

I'd rather the Taylor vs Prograis rematch.

[Skillz12]

Because Taylor fans know they’re guy lost most rds but got saved by the 2nd KD when he got dirty and told to break.

They will act like a rematch should never happen yet scream out loud for Teo to give Loma a rewatch despite being beaten clearly

[Toffee]

Was there a rematch in the contract?
Was it a controversial win?

Then why do people think there should be a rematch?

[jmrf4435]

Just saying,imho this was foty contender,& I picked Ramirez to get the upset,but thought the cards were right on pt within moe.(I think its meaningless that Taylor would've lost by 1 rd rd my card if not for the 2 kds,which made him win by 1 pt on my card or a draw would've been fair,as were cards,then again I scored him v Postal to be almost identical,Where the kd was the difference, albeit 1 instead of 2(I know its impossible for Postol not to have won a few rds minimum)

But I thought immediately why should Taylor ******ly go for Bud who brings no more money than Ramirez in rematch,& that is again winnable unlike Bud imo.

Because yoou are partially slow, your mother dropped you at birth

stop posting, please

[Skillz12]

Was there a rematch in the contract?
Was it a controversial win?

Then why do people think there should be a rematch?

It was a very close fight where one guy held on to win while the other rallied and only lost because of a KD so yeaaa they should rematch it was close.