Why no calls for a rematch?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • jmrf4435
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Jun 2014
    • 8397
    • 772
    • 14
    • 66,112

    #11
    Originally posted by kushking
    Just saying,imho this was foty contender,& I picked Ramirez to get the upset,but thought the cards were right on pt within moe.(I think its meaningless that Taylor would've lost by 1 rd rd my card if not for the 2 kds,which made him win by 1 pt on my card or a draw would've been fair,as were cards,then again I scored him v Postal to be almost identical,Where the kd was the difference, albeit 1 instead of 2(I know its impossible for Postol not to have won a few rds minimum)

    But I thought immediately why should Taylor ******ly go for Bud who brings no more money than Ramirez in rematch,& that is again winnable unlike Bud imo.
    How id the lobotomy go-

    Comment

    • kushking
      Osiris the pssy vampire
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Sep 2013
      • 9520
      • 891
      • 2,019
      • 337,046

      #12
      Originally posted by jmrf4435

      Because yoou are partially slow, your mother dropped you at birth

      stop posting, please
      Stfu dumbass,I actually want to see a great fight again,guess dumbasses don't like that

      Comment

      • kushking
        Osiris the pssy vampire
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Sep 2013
        • 9520
        • 891
        • 2,019
        • 337,046

        #13
        Originally posted by jmrf4435

        Because yoou are partially slow, your mother dropped you at birth

        stop posting, please
        Better than being put back in after ******** like you

        Comment

        • kushking
          Osiris the pssy vampire
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Sep 2013
          • 9520
          • 891
          • 2,019
          • 337,046

          #14
          Originally posted by Toffee
          Was there a rematch in the contract?
          Was it a controversial win?

          Then why do people think there should be a rematch?
          Why are fanatics of certain fighters against rematches when their guy wins a close decision? Who would you rather Taylor fights next thats better than Ramirez?(let alone whos worth it for Taylor)

          Comment

          • KP1
            Contender
            • Apr 2018
            • 456
            • 220
            • 43
            • 7,271

            #15
            Probably because many had it wider, 116-110 is a pretty common card, you think Postol won 8-9 rounds against Taylor and was 100% robbed, you’re not exactly impartial are you flower.

            Comment

            • JakeTheBoxer
              undisputed champion
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Dec 2014
              • 21179
              • 4,635
              • 2,802
              • 123,960

              #16
              It was less competitive than Lopez -Lomachenko.

              Lomachenko threw away first 6 rounds and the fight was still close.

              Taylor dropped Ramirez twice.

              Ramirez must earn a rematch.

              Comment

              • ShaneMosleySr
                Banned
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Mar 2019
                • 10325
                • 1,049
                • 903
                • 276,311

                #17
                It was a wipeout.

                Taylor was so far ahead, he gave away the last three rounds and didn’t even care.

                The cards were as generous as humanly possible and Ramirez still lost.

                Comment

                • BLASTER1
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Dec 2017
                  • 9068
                  • 608
                  • 1,290
                  • 335,405

                  #18
                  Originally posted by kushking
                  Just saying,imho this was foty contender,& I picked Ramirez to get the upset,but thought the cards were right on pt within moe.(I think its meaningless that Taylor would've lost by 1 rd rd my card if not for the 2 kds,which made him win by 1 pt on my card or a draw would've been fair,as were cards,then again I scored him v Postal to be almost identical,Where the kd was the difference, albeit 1 instead of 2(I know its impossible for Postol not to have won a few rds minimum)

                  But I thought immediately why should Taylor ******ly go for Bud who brings no more money than Ramirez in rematch,& that is again winnable unlike Bud imo.
                  Why hate on Bud all the time.
                  Why do you care if he gets paid less or more for fighting Bud.
                  Maybe Josh wants to build a legacy and that would be fighting the best at a higher division.
                  Don't understand why you are worried about which fight he would make more money instead off let's see if Josh can hang with the elite.

                  Comment

                  • ippo
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Jan 2006
                    • 3482
                    • 340
                    • 56
                    • 22,846

                    #19
                    Originally posted by Skillz12

                    It was a very close fight where one guy held on to win while the other rallied and only lost because of a KD so yeaaa they should rematch it was close.
                    It was not close. It was a clear victory for Taylor. He appeared a lvl above Ramirez.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP