Why no calls for a rematch?
Collapse
-
Why are fanatics of certain fighters against rematches when their guy wins a close decision? Who would you rather Taylor fights next thats better than Ramirez?(let alone whos worth it for Taylor)Comment
-
It was less competitive than Lopez -Lomachenko.
Lomachenko threw away first 6 rounds and the fight was still close.
Taylor dropped Ramirez twice.
Ramirez must earn a rematch.Comment
-
It was a wipeout.
Taylor was so far ahead, he gave away the last three rounds and didn’t even care.
The cards were as generous as humanly possible and Ramirez still lost.Comment
-
Why hate on Bud all the time.Just saying,imho this was foty contender,& I picked Ramirez to get the upset,but thought the cards were right on pt within moe.(I think its meaningless that Taylor would've lost by 1 rd rd my card if not for the 2 kds,which made him win by 1 pt on my card or a draw would've been fair,as were cards,then again I scored him v Postal to be almost identical,Where the kd was the difference, albeit 1 instead of 2(I know its impossible for Postol not to have won a few rds minimum)
But I thought immediately why should Taylor ******ly go for Bud who brings no more money than Ramirez in rematch,& that is again winnable unlike Bud imo.
Why do you care if he gets paid less or more for fighting Bud.
Maybe Josh wants to build a legacy and that would be fighting the best at a higher division.
Don't understand why you are worried about which fight he would make more money instead off let's see if Josh can hang with the elite.Comment
-
Comment
Comment