Who is the better “Undisputed” Champion at 140? Crawford or Taylor

[Thuglife Nelo]

Just so guys get an idea how in-house rotational magic works. When you see Crawford beats Taylor easily, you’ll think twice about Top Rank 140 Undisputed.

[ShaneMosleySr]

Taylor has the way better resume at 140.

[TernceBudCharlo]

Well you already admitted that Bud beats him easily, when Taylor fought Postol anyone who knows boxing knows that Postol won.

[KTFOKING]

Taylor fought better opponents but Crawford would have beat those guys as well and if Crawford fought Ramirez, no one would think that would be an even or close to a pick-em fight.

[BigZ44]

Crawford probably a bit better, Taylor had the tougher road to get there. His 3rd best win at 140 is Crawford's best

[SplitSecond]

Taylor has had the far harder path. No denying that. 147 though, when he walks into the shots we have seen him walk into vs Prograis and Ramirez, will get him hurt vs Crawford unless he can get stronger with the move up.

[Mr Giggles]

Really? Obviously Crawford. Crawford absolutely destroys Taylor. Crawford is ELITE

[Thuglife Nelo]

The point of the exercise is paradoxical because the only fight that matters for Taylor here forward is Crawford…

[GreyFox]

Taylor. Can't remember anyone Crawford fought at 140 other than Postol.

[moochi]

Taylor the much more accomplished in getting the 4 belts, beating legitimate undefeated champions...

Crawford fought a but who had two belts who he got off bums..

That said Crawford still the much better fighter (which wasn't the question posed in this thread).