Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

If Manny is somehow able to pull it off

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #51
    Originally posted by djtmal View Post

    I am not pretending anything. I said who are these "boxing historians" that have Floyd so far ahead of Manny that the case is closed. Whose lists are you referring to ESPN and Boxrec?
    Have they rethought things since Manny beat Thurman?
    Why would that impact anything? Beating Thurman isn’t better than beating Canelo or Manny, so again let it go.

    Comment


    • #52
      Originally posted by djtmal View Post

      Hello the only one who brought him up is you
      Sure. Look at all the threads.

      Comment


      • #53
        Originally posted by The Big Dunn View Post

        Why would that impact anything? Beating Thurman isn’t better than beating Canelo or Manny, so again let it go.
        It would certainly make an impact.
        Floyd ducked prime undefeated champ in his division Thurman straight up and fought a bum in Andre Berto.

        And where are all these boxing historians g

        I am about to send a search party for you so you can find these missing people

        Comment


        • #54
          Originally posted by The Big Dunn View Post

          Why would that impact anything? Beating Thurman isn’t better than beating Canelo or Manny, so again let it go.
          Why isn't Pac beating thurman at 41 a guy.much naturally bigger than him, younger than pac, fresher than pac better than Floyd's win over a cw green non.Mexican great (nel o wasn't considered one of Mexico's greatest ever fighters when Floyd beat nelo) and Floyd's win over a 71 fight former flyweight?
          When did Floyd ever beat anyone of thurman level when Floyd was 41? I'll wait
          Spoon23 Spoon23 likes this.

          Comment


          • #55
            Originally posted by djtmal View Post

            It would certainly make an impact.
            Floyd ducked prime undefeated champ in his division Thurman straight up and fought a bum in Andre Berto.

            And where are all these boxing historians g

            I am about to send a search party for you so you can find these missing people
            You wording that way is childish. Floyd fought Berto. He didn’t fight Thurman. That is like saying Manny ducked Crawford because he fought Thurman, who was the lesser of the 2.

            Like I posted you can keep playing dumb. That’s all you can do. You’ve seen the lists and commented about them.

            Comment


            • #56
              Originally posted by hugh grant View Post

              Why isn't Pac beating thurman at 41 a guy.much naturally bigger than him, younger than pac, fresher than pac better than Floyd's win over a cw green non.Mexican great (nel o wasn't considered one of Mexico's greatest ever fighters when Floyd beat nelo) and Floyd's win over a 71 fight former flyweight?
              When did Floyd ever beat anyone of thurman level when Floyd was 41? I'll wait
              he beat Canelo who is much better than Thurman. He beat Manny, before he beat Thurman. He has wins over Shane, hatton, cotto and jmm, all significantly better than Thurman.

              Let it go. Admit you were wrong.

              Comment


              • #57
                Originally posted by The Big Dunn View Post

                You wording that way is childish. Floyd fought Berto. He didn’t fight Thurman. That is like saying Manny ducked Crawford because he fought Thurman, who was the lesser of the 2.

                Like I posted you can keep playing dumb. That’s all you can do. You’ve seen the lists and commented about them.
                Dude Thurman was mandatory calling Floyd out for at least two years and Floyd still cherrypicked Berto. That isn't like saying nothing but what it is.

                Comment


                • #58
                  Originally posted by The Big Dunn View Post

                  he beat Canelo who is much better than Thurman. He beat Manny, before he beat Thurman. He has wins over Shane, hatton, cotto and jmm, all significantly better than Thurman.

                  Let it go. Admit you were wrong.
                  We not talking about who was better than Thurman. We talking about Thurman calling him out, being mandatory to his alphabet belt and being sidestepped for a t total bum in Andre Berto.

                  Comment


                  • #59
                    Originally posted by djtmal View Post

                    We not talking about who was better than Thurman. We talking about Thurman calling him out, being mandatory to his alphabet belt and being sidestepped for a t total bum in Andre Berto.
                    Everyone calls out the cash cow. Crawford called out manny. No fight.

                    let it go dude.

                    Comment


                    • #60
                      Originally posted by The Big Dunn View Post

                      he beat Canelo who is much better than Thurman. He beat Manny, before he beat Thurman. He has wins over Shane, hatton, cotto and jmm, all significantly better than Thurman.

                      Let it go. Admit you were wrong.
                      No, the Nelo Floyd beat weren't that good. If he was good he'd have been favourite against floyd. He was green and drained. Pac was 41, fighting thurman who was in boxing prime in thurman backyard.
                      Pac s win over thurman is historical and better than.anything in floydsvresume

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP