Is it just me or does Anthony Joshua have a very loserish fanbase?

[War Room]

It’s nice seeing a man fight who has a good physique. I want to see abs and buns of steel. Seeing saggy flabby skin is mostly gross

I'm glad you're enjoying yourself.

[Robbie Barrett]

As in good reigns. AJ’s reign has been 40 year olds and losing to a fat guy in Ruiz. Hardly a solid reign, he lost all the belts once already in his embarrassing US debut

Better reign than Fury's, better resume than Fury's. Not as embarrassing as losing the belts for being a steroid cheat or being caught lying constantly. You Fury fans have nothing to throw at Joshua. It's hilarious when you try.

[Dakuwaqa]

I'm glad you're enjoying yourself.

Desperate times!

[War Room]

Desperate times!

I hear ya brother. Got to take what you can get!

[deathofaclown]

Better reign than Fury's, better resume than Fury's. Not as embarrassing as losing the belts for being a steroid cheat or being caught lying constantly. You Fury fans have nothing to throw at Joshua. It's hilarious when you try.

Better Resume? Depends if you go on quality or quantity.

Fury beat Wlad first and dethroned him. So he has the better win for sure, considering it’s considered both of their best wins.

Fury beat Wilder, which is a better win than anything on AJ’s resume outside of Wlad.

So fury has two better wins than anything Joshua has ever got. So the quality wins are with Fury, i’m sure we can agree on that? Only a liar or somebody deluded would say otherwise.

as for the other names on AJ’s resume..Mostly just 40-year-old men who were decent years before AJ fought them. But if you want to consider their names as part of a good resume regardless of them being faded, then that’s okay. Even then the likes of Povetkin or Pulev were not world beaters even in their prime. Povetkin held some regular title once. Pulev had one world title shot and got smashed.

Who else has he beat? Parker? He arguably just lost to Chisora. Whyte? Decent win but it was a domestic level at the time, A bit like Fury v Chisora. Who else?

[Robbie Barrett]

Better Resume? Depends if you go on quality or quantity.

Fury beat Wlad first and dethroned him. So he has the better win for sure, considering it’s considered both of their best wins.

Fury beat Wilder, which is a better win than anything on AJ’s resume outside of Wlad.

So fury has two better wins than anything Joshua has ever got. So the quality wins are with Fury, i’m sure we can agree on that? Only a liar or somebody deluded would say otherwise.

as for the other names on AJ’s resume..Mostly just 40-year-old men who were decent years before AJ fought them. But if you want to consider their names as part of a good resume regardless of them being faded, then that’s okay. Who else has he beat? Parker? He arguably just lost to Chisora. Whyte? Decent win but it was a domestic level at the time, A bit like Fury v Chisora. Who else?

Most people consider it Joshua's better. FACTUALLY (going by ratings) Joshua's is better not even debatable. Two better wins? Stop it the Wilder hype has gone. It's debatable Joshua fought the better Wlad.

If Joshua's opponents were so easy why have Wilder and Fury avoided them and chose lower ranked opponents that bring less money?

The facts don't support your argument.

As i said reign and resume Joshua is above Fury.


You have nothing. Your boy is a lying, cheating, cherry picking, fraud.

[Boxing-1013]

Most people consider it Joshua's better. FACTUALLY (going by ratings) Joshua's is better not even debatable. Two better wins? Stop it the Wilder hype has gone. It's debatable Joshua fought the better Wlad.

If Joshua's opponents were so easy why have Wilder and Fury avoided them and chose lower ranked opponents that bring less money?

The facts don't support your argument.

As i said reign and resume Joshua is above Fury.


You have nothing. Your boy is a lying, cheating, cherry picking, fraud.

The Wilder hype is gone because FURY ended it. AJ wanted no part of that fight, you know that. Cut the BS

[Robbie Barrett]

The Wilder hype is gone because FURY ended it. AJ wanted no part of that fight, you know that. Cut the BS

Wilder confirmed himself he had a much better offer from Joshua but chose Fury. "wanted no part" though.

[deathofaclown]

Most people consider it Joshua's better. FACTUALLY (going by ratings) Joshua's is better not even debatable. Two better wins? Stop it the Wilder hype has gone. It's debatable Joshua fought the better Wlad.

If Joshua's opponents were so easy why have Wilder and Fury avoided them and chose lower ranked opponents that bring less money?

The facts don't support your argument.

As i said reign and resume Joshua is above Fury.


You have nothing. Your boy is a lying, cheating, cherry picking, fraud.

It’s not debatable AJ fought a better Wlad. Nobody gets better at 41. Only AJ fans make that ****** claim. Wlad was champ for a decade before Fury took all his belts.

The Wilder hype has gone because Fury smashed him you idiot haha. He was long considered a top 1-3 HW in the world before that for about 5 years, so you can’t discredit that win now.

So apart from Wlad, AJ has never fought anyone that was considered in the top 2 or 3 in the world. Wlad is the only one and even he was coming off a loss to Fury

you’re embarrassing yourself now Robert

[Gandhi]

All fans are losers.

Their lives are so miserable, they need to fill the giant holes in their souls by feeling joy for a random stranger’s success.

This is the truth to an extent.

But you got a lame here talking about “I’m a big guy”, lol. I can’t.

Like, who cares about you? It’s a boxing forum to discuss boxers & boxing. Not some delusional h0m0.