Is it just me or does Anthony Joshua have a very loserish fanbase?

[deathofaclown]

Oh but you do. You bring up Fury's mental health as an excuse for his time off because you don't want to tell the truth that he was banned for steroids.

Funny opinion you have their.

Isn't that what Fury did beat Wlad and was only #1 for a few months? So that meant nothing.... good to know.

You realise that Wilder only got to #1 for a few months because Joshua beat Ruiz too. So Wilder being #1 meant nothing too.

You really don't think before opening your mouth do you?

Go and find one thread where I have instigated any talk of mental health. The only thing I’ve ever said about it was against folk saying fury made up the mental health thing after the Wlad fight, when he had clearly spoken about it a long time before that. The only time I’ve ever talked about it is to correct people with facts. It’s up to anybody whether they believe the mental health thing or not, but it’s a total lie that he first talked about it after the Klitschko fight. A lie that you continue to spout.

Fury beat Klitschko when he was the consensus number one in the world for years. He beat Wilder when he was in the top 3 for 5 years. AJ has never beaten noteworthy opponents like that, especially when they were going strong.

the only true top 3 fighter AJ beat was Wlad, coming off a loss. We are talking about fighters that have sustained success at a good level.

Joshua has never beaten a true division number 1, Not someone that held that spot for a while. Ruiz was never the number one in the world, He was a one fight wonder because AJ is fragile. Now he’s back to being the mediocre fighter he always was.

At least let’s stop pretending Ruiz was the best heavyweight in the world lol. It makes you sound ridiculous and overshadows any sensible points you
could make.

[Shadoww702]

AJ fans are like ******** and homeless ppl... Too fkn WEIRD to even try and understand. Best just cross the street and avoid eye contact at ALL times.

[Robbie Barrett]

Go and find one thread where I have instigated any talk of mental health. The only thing I’ve ever said about it was against folk saying fury made up the mental health thing after the Wlad fight, when he had clearly spoken about it a long time before that. The only time I’ve ever talked about it is to correct people with facts. It’s up to anybody whether they believe the mental health thing or not, but it’s a total lie that he first talked about it after the Klitschko fight. A lie that you continue to spout.

Fury beat Klitschko when he was the consensus number one in the world for years. He beat Wilder when he was in the top 3 for 5 years. AJ has never beaten noteworthy opponents like that, especially when they were going strong.

the only true top 3 fighter AJ beat was Wlad, coming off a loss. We are talking about fighters that have sustained success at a good level.

Joshua has never beaten a true division number 1, Not someone that held that spot for a while. Ruiz was never the number one in the world, He was a one fight wonder because AJ is fragile. Now he’s back to being the mediocre fighter he always was.

At least let’s stop pretending Ruiz was the best heavyweight in the world lol. It makes you sound ridiculous and overshadows any sensible points you
could make.

So you keep shifting the goal posts after you score an own goal....... Ruiz was the #1 in the world. His best win is better than both Wilder and Fury's. You can't cherry pick when to use rankings and when not to. You're twisting yourself in knots and getting nowhere except exposing how biased you really are. The facts just don't support your nonsense. You've tried to tear Joshua's resume but done Fury's in the process.

I've noticed you chatting nonsense about Usyk beating Wlad in sparring. So that'll be another quality win over Fury's resume. Or are you going to change your mind when Joshua wrecks him?

[deathofaclown]

So you keep shifting the goal posts after you score an own goal....... Ruiz was the #1 in the world. His best win is better than both Wilder and Fury's. You can't cherry pick when to use rankings and when not to. You're twisting yourself in knots and getting nowhere except exposing how biased you really are. The facts just don't support your nonsense. You've tried to tear Joshua's resume but done Fury's in the process.

I've noticed you chatting nonsense about Usyk beating Wlad in sparring. So that'll be another quality win over Fury's resume. Or are you going to change your mind when Joshua wrecks him?

I was saying Usyk has plenty of experience fighting taller fighters with a good jab in the amateurs and gyms, so I think it will take more than to beat Usyk. I think him and Joshua stylistically is a very good fight. I will give Joshua credit if he beats him as it will be a very good win in my eyes, his second best win. I’m not one of the few writing Usyk off because of the Chisora fight. Styles make fights

You’re the idiot saying he will be useless against anybody with a jab, but no doubt if Joshua beats him you will be saying it’s an incredible win haha.


oh and Ruiz beating AJ is better than Fury taking Wlad’s titles after 10 years of dominance? Haha come on. You just sound silly now Rob. ****** things like that just make it clear that you are a fanboy first, before having any boxing knowledge.

That’s the difference, I’m boxing fan and always give credit where it’s due, Which is why I would give Joshua full credit if he beats Usyk.

[Robbie Barrett]

I was saying Usyk has plenty of experience fighting taller fighters with a good jab in the amateurs and gyms, so I think it will take more than to beat Usyk. I think him and Joshua stylistically is a very good fight. I will give Joshua credit if he beats him as it will be a very good win in my eyes, his second best win. I’m not one of the few writing Usyk off because of the Chisora fight. Styles make fights

You’re the idiot saying he will be useless against anybody with a jab, but no doubt if Joshua beats him you will be saying it’s an incredible win haha.


oh and Ruiz beating AJ is better than Fury taking Wlad’s titles after 10 years of dominance? Haha come on. You just sound silly now Rob. ****** things like that just make it clear that you are a fanboy first, before having any boxing knowledge.

That’s the difference, I’m boxing fan and always give credit where it’s due, Which is why I would give Joshua full credit if he beats Usyk.

You discredit fighters on age but don't want to use it against Fury. Ruiz beat the consensus #1 whom was physically in his prime. I've torn apart every argument you've made today. Also shown i have more knowledge on the subject than you. You're a fraud just like the guy you support.

By your own logic:
Fury isn't a real champ.
His wins over Wlad and Wilder really mean nothing.

This is going by you logic not mine.

"I'm a boxing fan" well act like one and stop having double standards for the lying, steroid cheat.

[deathofaclown]

You discredit fighters on age but don't want to use it against Fury. Ruiz beat the consensus #1 whom was physically in his prime. I've torn apart every argument you've made today. Also shown i have more knowledge on the subject than you. You're a fraud just like the guy you support.

By your own logic:
Fury isn't a real champ.
His wins over Wlad and Wilder really mean nothing.

This is going by you logic not mine.

"I'm a boxing fan" well act like one and stop having double standards for the lying, steroid cheat.

How would my logic mean wins over Wlad and Wilder mean nothing? Haha. Wlad was champ for 10 years, Fury dethroned him. It’s far more impressive than anything Joshua has ever done. Wlad may have been starting to age, But fury was the only man good enough to exploit that. Joshua almost got flattened by an even older version coming off loss. If Klitschko still had the confidence of a champion and a little bit younger like when he fight Fury, He would’ve knocked Joshua out. Luckily for Joshua, Fury already mentally destroyed Wladimir.

AJ wasn’t the consensus number 1 when Ruiz beat him by the way. Most rankings such as the ring magazine had fury number one at that point. Shows how much boxing knowledge you have.

That’s another point, Ring magazine titles go to the guys that are beating guys who are considered one or two in the division. They are on the line for those kind of fights. That’s why fury won it 2 times and Joshua has won it 0 times . You know why? Because Joshua doesn’t fight the best fighters in the division. That’s proof for you.

look at ring belt holders now, Fury, Canelo, Lopez, Taylor. There are fighting top guys in the division and they’re winning these ring belts in those fights. You can’t fight for a ring magazine belt in bum fights against 40 year olds like Joshua fights.

[sicko]

AJ, Wilder and Fury ALL have some IDIOT Fans! Really don't like any of you Male GROUPIES!

Being a fan of one thing but some of you guys take this boxing thing too far and get way too emotionally attached to boxers. When you're a kid that is one thing but most of you are grown men who are much older than most of these fighters but yet you worship these men like they're your Gods or something. First of all stop disrespecting all of these men because I guarantee most wouldn't DARE say none of that stuff you post on the internet in their IG Comment section...to their faces instead you're the same fans sucking up to them in person talking about "Can I Get A Picture With You Champ?"

We're just FANS at the end of the day, Not Promoters, Not Managers, Not Matchmakers, Not Network Execs or none of that so a lot of fans need to stay in their lane and understand that nobody force you to watch or buy PPV's. If you don't like a certain fighter or don't like certain match ups then just don't watch. Instead of that, No Sport has more B^TCHY Men than Boxing! A lot of F^cking Miserable Man Boys whom so some of you want fighters and other fans to be just as Miserable as YOU!

tenor.gif

Nothing but respect for All Fighters with the BALLS to get in that ring and do what they!

[Robbie Barrett]

How would my logic mean wins over Wlad and Wilder mean nothing? Haha. Wlad was champ for 10 years, Fury dethroned him. It’s far more impressive than anything Joshua has ever done. Wlad may have been starting to age, But fury was the only man good enough to exploit that. Joshua almost got flattened by an even older version coming off loss. If Klitschko still had the confidence of a champion and a little bit younger like when he fight Fury, He would’ve knocked Joshua out. Luckily for Joshua, Fury already mentally destroyed Wladimir.

AJ wasn’t the consensus number 1 when Ruiz beat him by the way. Most rankings such as the ring magazine had fury number one at that point. Shows how much boxing knowledge you have.

That’s another point, Ring magazine titles go to the guys that are beating guys who are considered one or two in the division. They are on the line for those kind of fights. That’s why fury won it 2 times and Joshua has won it 0 times . You know why? Because Joshua doesn’t fight the best fighters in the division. That’s proof for you.

look at ring belt holders now, Fury, Canelo, Lopez, Taylor. There are fighting top guys in the division and they’re winning these ring belts in those fights. You can’t fight for a ring magazine belt in bum fights against 40 year olds like Joshua fights.

You said a fighter being #1 for a few months really means nothing. Did you not?

Fury was only #1 for a few months after Klitschko. By your logic it means nothing.

Wilder was only #1 for a few months after Joshua beat Ruiz. Your logic means nothing.

Wilder-Fury only became for lineal because Joshua beat Ruiz. So again, your logic means nothing.

I'm applying your standards here.

Johsua was #1 until he lost to Ruiz on every rankings including the ring. How many times do you have to be proven wrong?


"Heavyweight – Ruiz crashes rankings at No. 3. Joshua falls from No. 1 to No. 4. Tyson Fury and Deontay Wilder are now Nos. 1 and 2. Should they hold their current placement going into an anticipated rematch in early 2020, the vacant Ring title will be on the line. But, as June 1 reminds us, a lot can happen in the heavyweight division in that time."

https://www.ringtv.com/566814-ring-r...ight-rankings/

Who's knowledge is in question now?

Nobody goes by the ring anymore by the way. TBRB are the most credible. Joshua was #1 there too.

Embarrassing you don't know **** and lie just like Fury.

[deathofaclown]

You said a fighter being #1 for a few months really means nothing. Did you not?

Fury was only #1 for a few months after Klitschko. By your logic it means nothing.

Wilder was only #1 for a few months after Joshua beat Ruiz. Your logic means nothing.

Wilder-Fury only became for lineal because Joshua beat Ruiz. So again, your logic means nothing.

I'm applying your standards here.

Johsua was #1 until he lost to Ruiz on every rankings including the ring. How many times do you have to be proven wrong?


"Heavyweight – Ruiz crashes rankings at No. 3. Joshua falls from No. 1 to No. 4. Tyson Fury and Deontay Wilder are now Nos. 1 and 2. Should they hold their current placement going into an anticipated rematch in early 2020, the vacant Ring title will be on the line. But, as June 1 reminds us, a lot can happen in the heavyweight division in that time."

https://www.ringtv.com/566814-ring-r...ight-rankings/

Who's knowledge is in question now?

Nobody goes by the ring anymore by the way. TBRB are the most credible. Joshua was #1 there too.

Embarrassing you don't know **** and lie just like Fury.

Difference is Fury beat Wlad, then later beat another true top 3 fighter and champ, a few years later. Proving he has longevity as a top fighter. He won every belt from domestic, European and world level. Any belt that can be won. That’s why his win over Wlad proves something, he can win big fights years apart.

Andy Ruiz on the other hand is a mediocre fighter who had one good night, but before and since proved to be a mediocre fighter. Couldn’t even beat Parker. He was a flash in the pan and will never sustain himself as a top fighter with big wins over long periods of time.

that’s the difference. Same reason nobody talks about Buster Douglas as being a great fighter, They talk about one fight.

[Robbie Barrett]

Difference is Fury beat Wlad, then later beat another true top 3 fighter and champ, a few years later. Proving he has longevity as a top fighter. He won every belt from domestic, European and world level. Any belt that can be won. That’s why his win over Wlad proves something, he can win big fights years apart.

Andy Ruiz on the other hand is a mediocre fighter who had one good night, but before and since proved to be a mediocre fighter. Couldn’t even beat Parker. He was a flash in the pan and will never sustain himself as a top fighter with big wins over long periods of time.

that’s the difference. Same reason nobody talks about Buster Douglas as being a great fighter, They talk about one fight.

Blah blah blah. "I don't want to use the same standards because i'm a fangirl"

Andy Ruiz beat a prime #1 fighter. Something Fury has never done. FACTS. He didn't fail a drug test before the fight either. FACTS. Look at the mediocre nights Fury has had you clown. Yet again you're having double standards. You can't help yourself.

Buster Douglas gets credit by all real boxing fans for a great win.

I see you ignore being proven wrong again. Didn't you question my knowledge and get owned?


oh yeah here it is: "AJ wasn’t the consensus number 1 when Ruiz beat him by the way. Most rankings such as the ring magazine had fury number one at that point. Shows how much boxing knowledge you have."