Is it just me or does Anthony Joshua have a very loserish fanbase?

[deathofaclown]

Blah blah blah. "I don't want to use the same standards because i'm a fangirl"

Andy Ruiz beat a prime #1 fighter. Something Fury has never done. FACTS. He didn't fail a drug test before the fight either. FACTS. Look at the mediocre nights Fury has had you clown. Yet again you're having double standards. You can't help yourself.

Buster Douglas gets credit by all real boxing fans for a great win.

I see you ignore being proven wrong again. Didn't you question my knowledge and get owned?


oh yeah here it is: "AJ wasn’t the consensus number 1 when Ruiz beat him by the way. Most rankings such as the ring magazine had fury number one at that point. Shows how much boxing knowledge you have."

And Andy Ruiz deserves credit for his win but it doesn’t make him a top fighter, like Buster Douglas was never considered a real top fighter because he had no
longevity around the top of the division, like Ruiz. Nobody is discrediting the wins on that night, it just doesn’t make them top class fighters in general.

Wlad and Wilder were in the top 3 of the division for years. So they are real top fighters, as are Fury and AJ.

Let’s not pretend AJ beat some top level fighter in the Ruiz rematch. He beat a mediocre fighter that he should never have lost to in the first place, that’s just the reality. It should never have even got to that point.

AJ wasn’t really considered no.1 when Ruiz beat him anyway. The likes of the ring magazine had him behind Fury.

plus as I said. Fury is a 2 time ring belt holder, you only get those belts fighting the true top fighters. That’s why AJ has never even fought for one. He’s never fought the calibre of opponents that Fury fought in big defining fights. Fighting faded names or ex champs at about 40 or flash in the pan fighters like Ruiz doesn’t mean you are fighting top quality opponents.

[Robbie Barrett]

And Andy Ruiz deserves credit for his win but it doesn’t make him a top fighter, like Buster Douglas was never considered a real top fighter because he had no
longevity around the top of the division, like Ruiz. Nobody is discrediting the wins on that night, it just doesn’t make them top class fighters in general.

Wlad and Wilder were in the top 3 of the division for years. So they are real top fighters, as are Fury and AJ.

Let’s not pretend AJ beat some top level fighter in the Ruiz rematch. He beat a mediocre fighter that he should never have lost to in the first place, that’s just the reality. It should never have even got to that point.

AJ wasn’t really considered no.1 when Ruiz beat him anyway. The likes of the ring magazine had him behind Fury.

plus as I said. Fury is a 2 time ring belt holder, you only get those belts fighting the true top fighters. That’s why AJ has never even fought for one. He’s never fought the calibre of opponents that Fury fought in big defining fights. Fighting faded names or ex champs at about 40 or flash in the pan fighters like Ruiz doesn’t mean you are fighting top quality opponents.

How is Ruiz going to prove himself when Fury and Wilder won't fight top 10 fighters? He has a far better win than Wilder has.

I've already shown you he was #1 when Ruiz beat him, he was ahead of Fury.

How is it "not really"? See you can't be consistent.

Why's he a 2 time belt holder? Because he was stripped for roids and Ruiz beat the #1.

You have double standards. After Joshua beat Wlad they were 1 and 2. So only because of inactivity by Wlad (Fury being a cheat and messing about) was Joshua-Wlad not for the ring title.

Joshua has consistently beat top 10 competition. Fury and Wilder have not. They are what you call cherry pickers. Joshua tries to fight your "true top fighters" and they lie and duck. He's fighting the best available. Wilder and Fury are not, Joshua is the best available for them.

Joshua has the most belts, the better resume and more class than both Wilder and Fury. He's what a champion should be. A "boxing fan" would see that but you're a Fury fan first.

[deathofaclown]

Joshua has the most belts, the better resume and more class than both Wilder and Fury. He's what a champion should be. A "boxing fan" would see that but you're a Fury fan first.

All belts which fury never lost in the ring. AJ is a belt collector until he beats worthy fighter for belts. Until then, he’s just like a heavyweight Ricky Burns.

Fury and Wilder would never lose belts to a fat fringe world level fighter like Ruiz. You said Ruiz doesn’t get chance to show he is a top fighter. He lost to Parker remember? And Parker is no world beater himself, let’s be honest.

At the end of the day, Joshua’s only top
win is Wlad, and that’s after he was coming off a loss to Fury. I know that fact kills AJ fans but it’s true. His best win is a 41 year old Fury leftover. Deal with it.

[Robbie Barrett]

All belts which fury never lost in the ring. AJ is a belt collector until he beats worthy fighter for belts. Until then, he’s just like a heavyweight Ricky Burns.

Fury and Wilder would never lose belts to a fat fringe world level fighter like Ruiz. You said Ruiz doesn’t get chance to show he is a top fighter. He lost to Parker remember? And Parker is no world beater himself, let’s be honest.

At the end of the day, Joshua’s only top
win is Wlad, and that’s after he was coming off a loss to Fury. I know that fact kills AJ fans but it’s true. His best win is a 41 year old Fury leftover. Deal with it.

Losing them for being a steroid cheat is better? Should he have even been allowed to fight for them in the first place having failed the test prior to the Wlad fight?

Fury could have easily lost 2 of his last 4 fights. He lost to McDermott and robbed him.

Fury won't fight fighters like Ruiz that's the damn point, he cherry picks further down.

Fact is Wlad was top 2, Ruiz was 1, Parker was 3. Do i need to go on?

Leftover? Fury did hardly **** all in that fight. He ran around the ring, it was a close fight Fury fans trying to tell everyone different won't change that.

You said yourself. Fury isn't a real champ. That should have been the end of the discussion.

[KingGilgamesh]

You said a fighter being #1 for a few months really means nothing. Did you not?

Fury was only #1 for a few months after Klitschko. By your logic it means nothing.

Wilder was only #1 for a few months after Joshua beat Ruiz. Your logic means nothing.

Wilder-Fury only became for lineal because Joshua beat Ruiz. So again, your logic means nothing.

I'm applying your standards here.

Johsua was #1 until he lost to Ruiz on every rankings including the ring. How many times do you have to be proven wrong?


"Heavyweight – Ruiz crashes rankings at No. 3. Joshua falls from No. 1 to No. 4. Tyson Fury and Deontay Wilder are now Nos. 1 and 2. Should they hold their current placement going into an anticipated rematch in early 2020, the vacant Ring title will be on the line. But, as June 1 reminds us, a lot can happen in the heavyweight division in that time."

https://www.ringtv.com/566814-ring-r...ight-rankings/

Who's knowledge is in question now?

Nobody goes by the ring anymore by the way. TBRB are the most credible. Joshua was #1 there too.

Embarrassing you don't know **** and lie just like Fury.

Didn't you just say Ruiz was number one???

[Robbie Barrett]

Didn't you just say Ruiz was number one???

I never said he was #1 by Ring. Joshua was. He said he wasn't so i had to show him being a liar.

Yes by the rankings every boxing fan holds as the most credible. TBRB. Nobody gives a **** about the Ring anymore. There's been plenty of polls on the subject. Do you need confirmation?

[Marchegiano]

I never said he was #1 by Ring. Joshua was. He said he wasn't so i had to show him being a liar.

Yes by the rankings every boxing fan holds as the most credible. TBRB. Nobody gives a **** about the Ring anymore. There's been plenty of polls on the subject. Do you need confirmation?

Pretty sure most fans don't even know what TBRB is. Just because they're popular on forums of websites they work for doesn't mean they're more popular than Ring.

RingTV.com sees 1,881 monthly visits

TBRB.com gets 30-300

according to this place: Website Traffic Checker | Free tool to check website traffic (websiteseochecker.com)

But that's about what I'd expect.

We have TBRB writers here youse lot like to suck off...doesn't mean TBRB is worth half a ****.

[Eff Pandas]

I think fanboys, of any fighter, kinda got a loser vibe to them. So idk if its any worse with the AJ fanboys then it is with the Manny fanboys or GGG fanboys or whoever fanboys. Fanboys are losers a high % of the time.

[Robbie Barrett]

Pretty sure most fans don't even know what TBRB is. Just because they're popular on forums of websites they work for doesn't mean they're more popular than Ring.

RingTV.com sees 1,881 monthly visits

TBRB.com gets 30-300

according to this place: Website Traffic Checker | Free tool to check website traffic (websiteseochecker.com)

But that's about what I'd expect.

We have TBRB writers here youse lot like to suck off...doesn't mean TBRB is worth half a ****.

How would that website know? That's not how it works. Since when does being more popular mean more credible? Fans on sites like this are more credible than casuals. The ring is seen as not credible because they're owned by a promoter. ESPN work with top rank. Boxrec is just garbage. So what's left? TBRB the most credible rankings on the net.

[Marchegiano]

How would that website know? That's not how it works. Since when does being more popular mean more credible? Fans on sites like this are more credible than casuals. The ring is seen as not credible because they're owned by a promoter. ESPN work with top rank. Boxrec is just garbage. So what's left? TBRB the most credible rankings on the net.

You want to have a credibility debate over promotional ranking systems that isn't centered around reach?


****ing ****** bud.