Comments Thread For: Fury: Looks Like I'll Have To Crack Deontay Wilder's Skull Again!

[FLY TY]

You haven't brought your home work into class, have you? You've run away without backing up your mad talk.

Would you like to get round to doing that? Or have you conceded and will therefore refrain from talking complete bullshlt?

I think we both know you'll keep on with your madness. But at least you know you've been dealt with and you're nothing but a delusional coward like your hero. That's how pathetic you are. Now take your L.

The only thing I've conceded is that if you think Klitschko and Povetkin were prime fighters when AJ beat them, then there's no getting through to you, and it makes no sense to keep beating the dead horse. The same goes for Whyte, a guy whose had a 10 year career, been stopped multiple times, including recently by a 40 year old man, and has never held a world title...if you consider him world-level, again there's no getting through to you.

If someone is not willing to look at facts and be objective, there's only so much you can say. I gave you Parker as world-level when AJ beat him, but we'll have to agree to disagree on Whyte, Povetkin, and Klitschko.

[Sid-Knee]

The only thing I've conceded is that if you think Klitschko and Povetkin were prime fighters when AJ beat them, then there's no getting through to you, and it makes no sense to keep beating the dead horse. The same goes for Whyte, a guy whose had a 10 year career, been stopped multiple times, including recently by a 40 year old man, and has never held a world title...if you consider him world-level, again there's no getting through to you.

If someone is not willing to look at facts and be objective, there's only so much you can say. I gave you Parker as world-level when AJ beat him, but we'll have to agree to disagree on Whyte, Povetkin, and Klitschko.

Who did Wilder and Ortiz beat that was world class? Stop avoiding the question.

Are you still sticking to the 4-1 odds as evidence to the opponent not being world class?

If you give AJ credit for Parker, then you give Whyte credit for beating Parker too. Otherwise, you're contradicting yourself. But that's just what you do.

[FLY TY]

Who did Wilder and Ortiz beat that was world class? Stop avoiding the question.

Are you still sticking to the 4-1 odds as evidence to the opponent not being world class?

If you give AJ credit for Parker, then you give Whyte credit for beating Parker too. Otherwise, you're contradicting yourself. But that's just what you do.

Wilder is world class because of how many successful title defenses he's had. There's not any great fighters on his resume. I'd say Ortiz, but Ortiz hasn't really beaten anyone of significance.

Why give Whyte credit for beating Parker coming off a loss? I gave AJ credit because Parker was an undefeated champion when he beat him. Since, Parker has lost to Whyte, and really just lost to another guy with 10 losses.

The nice thing about life, is that you always get a chance to look back and reevaluate. Looking back on what Parker has done since he fought AJ, I think it's fair to ask how good the guy really was to begin with.

[Sid-Knee]

Wilder is world class because of how many successful title defenses he's had. There's not any great fighters on his resume. I'd say Ortiz, but Ortiz hasn't really beaten anyone of significance.

Why give Whyte credit for beating Parker coming off a loss? I gave AJ credit because Parker was an undefeated champion when he beat him. Since, Parker has lost to Whyte, and really just lost to another guy with 10 losses.

The nice thing about life, is that you always get a chance to look back and reevaluate. Looking back on what Parker has done since he fought AJ, I think it's fair to ask how good the guy really was to begin with.

You're back to "Title defences" because of how shlt Wilder's resume is. That's why you've been scared to point it out. But Ortiz? The guy older than them all? The guy who hasn't beaten anyone? That makes Wilder world class? You're a hypocrite and contradicting yourself. What made Ortiz world class for a win over him to mean "World level"?

Have you gone back on the 4-1 odds meaning you're not world class? Hello?

Parker ran and disengaged against AJ so didn't take any damage. He was fresh for Whyte. It was a good win. Parker beat Ruiz, which is a world class win. You can authenticate it. With Wilder and Ortiz, you can't. Which is why you've been avoiding answering a direct question. You know the truth. That's why you're insecure. I would be too if i mouthed off in favour of a couple of jokes like those two and got put in my place about it.

[FLY TY]

You're back to "Title defences" because of how shlt Wilder's resume is. That's why you've been scared to point it out. But Ortiz? The guy older than them all? The guy who hasn't beaten anyone? That makes Wilder world class? You're a hypocrite and contradicting yourself. What made Ortiz world class for a win over him to mean "World level"?

Have you gone back on the 4-1 odds meaning you're not world class? Hello?

Parker ran and disengaged against AJ so didn't take any damage. He was fresh for Whyte. It was a good win. Parker beat Ruiz, which is a world class win. You can authenticate it. With Wilder and Ortiz, you can't. Which is why you've been avoiding answering a direct question. You know the truth. That's why you're insecure. I would be too if i mouthed off in favour of a couple of jokes like those two and got put in my place about it.

I'm at title defenses, because of how weak the HW division is. AJ has been at 3 belt champion the last couple years, and IMO it's hard to find a great win on his resume. Wilder has had some good wins, but again, I don't consider this a great class of heavyweights. The guy has 10 consecutive defenses, and judging by just about anyone's metric, that's a great accomplishment, and puts you in a different class. AJ couldn't do it.

[removed]

Likewise, I did my research on this also and my conclusions are he cheated. For example: I know for a fact that Tyson Fury has never permanently disfigured or caused greatly bodily harm to any of his past opponents face like Deontay Wilder's; Who have never been stopped before. Also, Fury has never been known as a puncher or exhibited that type of punching power before. Not against Steve Cunningham, Derek Chisora or even Wladimir Klitschko.

So where did all this new found power come from for this fight? It does make the non-biased reasonable person very curious and su****ious. Besides, there's even video evidence of Fury punching Deontay Wilder with his bare knuckle fist through the non-padded wrist area of his left glove.

So obviously, you're biased and partial in your perception. You have been duped by racist white supremacist clowns who want to make a race thing out of this. However, the one thing that I can say about this is that one of us is right and telling the truth while the other one is not. However, we shall find out which one it is on fight night.

I see that you're still making a complete and utter fool out of yourself.

[kafkod]

Likewise, I did my research on this also and my conclusions are he cheated. For example: I know for a fact that Tyson Fury has never permanently disfigured or caused greatly bodily harm to any of his past opponents face like Deontay Wilder's; Who have never been stopped before. Also, Fury has never been known as a puncher or exhibited that type of punching power before. Not against Steve Cunningham, Derek Chisora or even Wladimir Klitschko.

So where did all this new found power come from for this fight? It does make the non-biased reasonable person very curious and su****ious. Besides, there's even video evidence of Fury punching Deontay Wilder with his bare knuckle fist through the non-padded wrist area of his left glove.

So obviously, you're biased and partial in your perception. You have been duped by racist white supremacist clowns who want to make a race thing out of this. However, the one thing that I can say about this is that one of us is right and telling the truth while the other one is not. However, we shall find out which one it is on fight night.

The race card .... again

[champion4ever]

The race card .... again

No. I never made this about race. You guys have made it about race. This is about what's right and what's wrong.

[champion4ever]

I see that you're still making a complete and utter fool out of yourself.

Am I? Well we shall see on fight night then shall we? I don't believe in my wildest dreams the Fury is capable of replicating that same performance again. I don't believe in coincidences. There's no question, if Fury's clean this time and playing on a even playing field, then he's getting his ass whooped.

[Jax teller]

I'm at title defenses, because of how weak the HW division is. AJ has been at 3 belt champion the last couple years, and IMO it's hard to find a great win on his resume. Wilder has had some good wins, but again, I don't consider this a great class of heavyweights. The guy has 10 consecutive defenses, and judging by just about anyone's metric, that's a great accomplishment, and puts you in a different class. AJ couldn't do it.

Give us a laugh and suggest which one of those ten defences AJ couldn't have pulled of with ease bearing in mind Ortiz literally wasn't allowed to fight AJ because of his blood pressure medication.