People don't think it through. for example, How do we know what Wilder was offered effective the decision yesterday? Heres the big problem. The contract for Fury Vs Joshua calls for two fights. So, assuming Wilder was game to take money, how would he get his chance? And... He would effectively have to be paid to wait for two fights, unless Fury can either renegotiate the contract with Joshua, or void it because "due to arbitration there is no longer a reasonable expectation that he can follow through on a two fight deal. Of course Wilder could take his fight inbetween, But would he want the Fury fight if Fury lost?
Under these conditions it seems that the simplest thing to do is indeed, fight Wilder first. BUT if Fury, or Joshua losses, what does that do to the financial value of hosting this fight? It seems to me the Saudis would not want to simply push the fight down a half a year, or so, because it would be taking a risk that both men came in to the fight as valuable as when the contract was first made.
The thing they might do is offer the Saudis an option of sorts: Or, they could offer Wilder an option if allowed to follow through on the original fight, (changed to a one fight deal) WWilder would have the option of fighting the winner of the fight.
Under these conditions it seems that the simplest thing to do is indeed, fight Wilder first. BUT if Fury, or Joshua losses, what does that do to the financial value of hosting this fight? It seems to me the Saudis would not want to simply push the fight down a half a year, or so, because it would be taking a risk that both men came in to the fight as valuable as when the contract was first made.
The thing they might do is offer the Saudis an option of sorts: Or, they could offer Wilder an option if allowed to follow through on the original fight, (changed to a one fight deal) WWilder would have the option of fighting the winner of the fight.
Comment