Comments Thread For: Tyson Fury vs. Deontay Wilder: Arbitration Judge Orders Third Fight

[I have no ears]

****** post.

he said it back in december after pulev. he said until fury-wilder 3 is sorted he isnt going to commit to fury.

he then got absolutely crucified by the edl racists on social media who threatened to boycott aj, that he is finished unless he goes for fury. then there was an ifl interview where he shifted his focus to fury (he had little choice sat this stage).
its why hes talking about pr, popularity, fury talking on social media etc.

vid is here btw

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dh54FyV83UY

6:38

That was just AJ being a little scared of losing his belts again, he had seen what fury did to wilder and that's why he didn't wanna commit to fury, which is the ****** thing not my post cos if he comes in with the right game plan I believe he has a shot against fury but even in his post fight interviews he's always looked scared of mentioning fury and Wilder's name.. Side point though you're obsession with the defunct many years ago edl and non existent racism is cringe, judge people on there character not there colour bro, people can pick out a guy scared of losing a mile away it's not racist to see that

[FinlandsFinest]

I remember commenting on YouTube about this, how Wilder may derail the whole AJ-Fury fight and how Fury should honor the contract.

Well I got called LDBC i got called this and that. LOOKY THERE, turns out I was right. Good on Wilder honestly. Hope he knocks out Fury.

PS: Can someone tell me what is LDBC i have been called that NUMEROUS times. Im not from America, im from Finland. I got NO CLUE why is that used as an insult to me.

[Articulateboxin]

Wilder's best career win to date, comes outside of the ring. Quite tragic really but a contract is a contract.

Quite surprising that Bob Arum was so adamant the Wilder team had no legal leg to stand on and even if it went their way, he was sure it wouldn't get in the way of the unification.

Glad I hadn't booked my flight!

[I have no ears]

Didn't I tell you that the Joshua/Fury fight wasn't happening. I am prophet. However, you doubted me Neutral. Despite that smooth jive that Tyson Fury laid on you guys in that twitter video. He lied to you guys. He is full of contradictory and inconsistencies. He knew he wasn't fighting AJ next. Also, he didn't receive a call from some Prince either. The fight was never happening. I told you about the legal trouble that he was in for breaching his rematch clause with Deontay Wilder but you didn't believe me.

Ever heard of the word humble? You're not the only one who called this the last few months, but anyone who frequents these boards often enough knows u called it along with many others but u lose all respect for calling it out, no-one likes the 'I told u so' guy, ...
also the prophet comment is just cringe worthy.

[FLY TY]

I don’t understand why Spence would fight for a wba super . No one knows who is holding that. Crawford is right there. What am I missing?

Simply because whoever wins between Errol and Terence would still have to double back and fight the WBA Super champ to become undisputed.

What would make for a bigger fight for them? Spence-Crawford unification, or Spence-Crawford for undisputed?

It's pretty clear in my eyes why go after Ugas first. The only ones that don't seem to understand are Crawford fans, or Spence haters, who don't want the guy coming into the fight with 3 belts.

[PBR Streetgang]

I completely understand your post. My point is, if it's was Crawford, or any fighter you actually root for in this same position, don't act like you'd be above it all.

I hear you. I don't favor Crawford or Spence over the other for that matter, I like them both and I'd love to see them fight and think it would be good for the sport. I'm a fan of the sport more than specific fighters and the majority of the fighters that I consider favorites arent relevant enough to be in these situations.

And while on the topic, I have no problem with fan passion and bias for a particular fighter (within reason)... But I don't understand the same passion and bias when it comes to promotional banners and viewing platforms.

[Richard]

Arum just said in another vid if Wilder wins arbitration it CAN derail undisputed. I think its legit. I've been saying that I knew this leftist judge would use covid to rule for Wilder(thats what leftists do,they want everyone to treat covid like the bubonic plague & throw out all precedent)

I still feel the Fury v Joshua fight goes ahead November/ December of this year if Fury and Joshua both win their now possible proposed next fights.

[FLY TY]

I remember commenting on YouTube about this, how Wilder may derail the whole AJ-Fury fight and how Fury should honor the contract.

Well I got called LDBC i got called this and that. LOOKY THERE, turns out I was right. Good on Wilder honestly. Hope he knocks out Fury.

PS: Can someone tell me what is LDBC i have been called that NUMEROUS times. Im not from America, im from Finland. I got NO CLUE why is that used as an insult to me.

The LDBC support black fighters here in America, but not only black fighters. You had one referring to Lomachenko as "White Jesus" for goodness sakes.

They feel black fighters get less praise and privilege, than others, so they just try to even the scales a little. Still, they support ANY fighter out here fighting the best fighters, and wanting to put on the best fights. They all have their own opinions, and agree and disagree sometimes.



What happens is you have idiots who maybe listen to one or two guys, and label them as racists. And if you yourself say anything in support of a black fighter, you will be labeled LDBC by the said idiots.

[FLY TY]

I hear you. I don't favor Crawford or Spence over the other for that matter, I like them both and I'd love to see them fight and think it would be good for the sport. I'm a fan of the sport more than specific fighters and the majority of the fighters that I consider favorites arent relevant enough to be in these situations.

And while on the topic, I have no problem with fan passion and bias for a particular fighter (within reason)... But I don't understand the same passion and bias when it comes to promotional banners and viewing platforms.

I agree. I'm a fan of Spence, obviously, but I'm with you on the network and promoter pom-pom waiving.

A s#it fight is a s#it fight, no matter what network it's on. I ordered DAZN this month, for the Canelo and Haney fights, will probably cancel after. I think it's ridiculous the Ramirez-Taylor fight isn't getting more buzz, as I think it's the most important fight so far this year. And I think it's a travesty PBC put Ruiz-arreola on ppv. I think as far as what's been released, PBC probably has a better rest-of-year schedule.

[FinlandsFinest]

The LDBC support black fighters here in America, but not only black fighters. You had one referring to Lomachenko as "White Jesus" for goodness sakes.

They feel black fighters get less praise and privilege, than others, so they just try to even the scales a little. Still, they support ANY fighter out here fighting the best fighters, and wanting to put on the best fights. They all have their own opinions, and agree and disagree sometimes.



What happens is you have idiots who maybe listen to one or two guys, and label them as racists. And if you yourself say anything in support of a black fighter, you will be labeled LDBC by the said idiots.

Thanks for enlightening me bro. Im definately not racist I grew up around refugees from all different backgrounds, Wilder was the reason I started following boxing more actively when he wont the title so thats my reason for being such a big fan of him. Plus the man seems someone you could hang out with in real life, cool dude. Some black fighters I support (Wilder, Crawford, Spence, Mayweather) and some I dont like that scumbag Broner for example.

I would agree with the LDBC that black fighters are getting under appreciated today, I see people are really hyping up the eastern european guys who turn pro super late in their careers.