It seems lost . . .
Collapse
-
It's funny but the pic you have posted ( which might be distorted by camera angle) makes BJ look larger that Canelo.
But true Canelo is a very thick looking fighter. I suspect it's how Dempsey looked to opponents 100 years ago.Comment
-
Saunders is naturally bigger than Alvarez, whether that be height or mass.I don't agree Saunders is a natural LHW. He is a natural MW. He's just too lazy to make 160. Look at him today weigh in at 167 and he looks soft and with a proper cut he could drop those 7 pounds. Compare Kieran Conway at 154 and he looks almost bigger than Saunders at 167. That's a proper weight cut.
Canelo isn't a natural WW he was boxing at lighter weights because he turned pro at 15. His body was still growing. Even at his 155 catch-weight he was re-hydrating 15-20 pounds post weigh-in. He looked like a skeleton against Floyd who dragged him down to 152.
Saunders is the taller guy not the bigger guy here. He's just a lazy slob too unprofessional to maintain himself at the correct fighting weight.
Alvarez is muscle upon muscle, Saunders is clearly naturally bigger.
Comment
-
-
Alvarez is muscle upon muscle, his frame is not that of a natural middle weight or super middle weight.
Saunders is naturally bigger, but he is not a big middle weight.
Thinking back to fighters like Chirs Eubank Senior, Nigel Benn, Steve Collins, Michael Watson 'Look at those guys at middle-weight compared to Alvarez, clearly bigger guys 'And did not have the muscle upon muscle physique'.
What I mean by a muscle upon, muscle physique is exactly what it states.
Alvarez as he has moved up in weight, has resembled a body builders physique, which is muscle upon muscle 'This has happened, because he does not have a middle weight frame'.
Anthony Joshua also has a muscle upon, muscle frame 'Wladimir Kiltachko at 240 pounds flat when they fought, looked like the naturally bigger man' and Lennox Lewis was probably bigger than both of them.
Comment
-
-
Comment
-
Comment
Comment