Comments Thread For: Malignaggi: I Don't Think Canelo Can Lose a Decision Anywhere in The World

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BIGPOPPAPUMP
    Franchise Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Sep 2003
    • 46545
    • 2,259
    • 334
    • 5,493,285

    #1

    Comments Thread For: Malignaggi: I Don't Think Canelo Can Lose a Decision Anywhere in The World

    Former two division world champion Paulie Malignaggi is heavily backing Saul 'Canelo' Alvarez to beat Billy Joe Saunders if the contest heads to the scorecards. Canelo has been the winner in several close decisions, against Erislandy Lara and Gennady Golovkin.
    [Click Here To Read More]
  • hitmanjosh
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Mar 2010
    • 5564
    • 1,659
    • 3
    • 25,389

    #2
    When did we start listening to Paulette again!

    Comment

    • Deleted
      Interim Champion
      Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
      • Oct 2017
      • 938
      • 262
      • 230
      • 14,904

      #3
      The sewers must be really backed up for this turd to be floating around again.

      Comment

      • Liondw
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Oct 2010
        • 5935
        • 1,867
        • 34
        • 23,904

        #4
        Well, it's not totally true, Mayweather beat Canelo easily, but one of the scorecards was ridiculous. He has a point in that if the fight is close, don't expect his opponent to get the decision.

        Having said that, I thought Canelo won a clear, although close, decision against Golovkin, fairly. Against Lara, I thought he edged it with his body punching, which are also points scoring shots. That was an extremely close fight though.

        Comment

        • ShaneMosleySr
          Banned
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Mar 2019
          • 10325
          • 1,049
          • 903
          • 276,311

          #5
          Paulie makes a completely valid point that no one would disagree with AND right on cue the Canelo fans tell us how much he sucks.

          Comment

          • champion4ever
            Undisputed Champion
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Sep 2007
            • 23442
            • 3,924
            • 6,761
            • 202,915,785

            #6
            I happen to agree with the racist!

            Comment

            • flojspot80
              Up and Comer
              Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
              • Jan 2014
              • 90
              • 17
              • 1
              • 7,645

              #7
              Ped popping, cheating, and corrupt judges. Paulie talking real here.

              Comment

              • Thuglife Nelo
                Banned
                • Dec 2018
                • 26836
                • 1,299
                • 1,822
                • 654,176

                #8
                Paulie been crying about scorecards his whole career, from Diaz to Broner…

                Comment

                • dynamicdez
                  Amateur
                  Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
                  • Sep 2009
                  • 4
                  • 3
                  • 0
                  • 6,167

                  #9
                  But at the time, Canelo was not the cash cow, Mayweather was. Also, Mayweather was the perceived (and actual) better boxer going into the fight, so Canelo didn’t have either blatant advantage going into the Mayweather fight, referenced by Paulie. Besides, any fight against Mayweather would be considered an outlier when comparing the circumstances vs other opponents in other fights.

                  Originally posted by Liondw
                  Well, it's not totally true, Mayweather beat Canelo easily, but one of the scorecards was ridiculous. He has a point in that if the fight is close, don't expect his opponent to get the decision.

                  Having said that, I thought Canelo won a clear, although close, decision against Golovkin, fairly. Against Lara, I thought he edged it with his body punching, which are also points scoring shots. That was an extremely close fight though.

                  Comment

                  • petegrif
                    Interim Champion
                    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                    • Mar 2015
                    • 855
                    • 160
                    • 45
                    • 12,875

                    #10
                    I don't think anyone with any remotely serious interest in boxing and knowledge of boxing history and the business disagrees with Pauli here. It's not exactly a secret amongst the pros.
                    That's why tt's so funny watching people get bent out of shape when opponents (like BJS) refuse to get steamrollered on other points in the attempt to level the playing field as much as possible.
                    If BJS was just coming to collect a check he wouldn't give a **** of the ring was 10' He's just trying to protect his interests.
                    And the reason he's going on about the judges is in an attempt to serve notice to the judges and the public that they can expect pushback if the cards are a joke. Sadly, the best he can hope for is a moral victory because judges still hand in terrible cards.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP