Comments Thread For: Triller Offers Amnesty Through June 1st To Offenders Targeted in April 17 Piracy Lawsuit

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • _Rexy_
    Undisputed Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Jan 2018
    • 27934
    • 6,140
    • 3,585
    • 358,040

    #11
    lmfao if Arum/Haymon/Oscar couldn't do **** about pirates, you think Triller can?

    Comment

    • TheBoxGod
      I Am Inevitable
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Oct 2020
      • 1704
      • 190
      • 126
      • 41,042

      #12
      Originally posted by _Rexy_
      lmfao if Arum/Haymon/Oscar couldn't do **** about pirates, you think Triller can?
      This is a scare tactic to squeeze out any extra dollars they can.

      Comment

      • rmorris003
        Up and Comer
        Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
        • Aug 2015
        • 80
        • 12
        • 0
        • 6,623

        #13
        Does this site have a list of names? If not then why would you admit to stealing it? Also for people watching on IPTV they can't go after anyone but the providers who provided the stream.

        Comment

        • _Rexy_
          Undisputed Champion
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Jan 2018
          • 27934
          • 6,140
          • 3,585
          • 358,040

          #14
          Originally posted by TheBoxGod

          This is a scare tactic to squeeze out any extra dollars they can.
          Of course, the fact that they're giving "amnesty" shows they already know they can't do anything. If they were smart they would have allowed the first one to be bootlegged so people could get a taste for the next one, but as you can see from the comments on here most people ****ing hated it

          Personally, I find it disrespectful as all hell for a ***** ass commentator to mock a fighter who's been knocked out.

          Comment

          • aaronbnb
            late notice replacement
            Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
            • Apr 2017
            • 900
            • 127
            • 62
            • 15,026

            #15
            Network monitoring has come a long way. The surveillance tech exists to back up Triller and UFC's threats. It's more than IP address, they know the device now and can reverse engineer from there.

            I'd be careful streaming. Times are changing.

            Comment

            • aaronbnb
              late notice replacement
              Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
              • Apr 2017
              • 900
              • 127
              • 62
              • 15,026

              #16
              Originally posted by TheBoxGod
              “VPN firewalls all have to comply and turn over the actual IP addresses of each person who stole the fight in discovery,”

              No they dont, most VPN have strict no log policy and end to end encryption so their isn't anything to hand over besides timestamps and random #'s that represent accounts but arent linked to any identifyably data. Take a look at Signal messenger who just been supeoned again for the 2nd time and they legally told the U.S. to chill we aint got no data cause they keep no logs aswell.
              https://signal.org/bigbrother/centra...ia-grand-jury/
              Signal is an engineering marvel with its own systems. They also get white privilege since it's Silicon Valley backed. The feds aren't bashing that CEO's front door in.

              The piracy sites are thrown together and use commercial big tech i.e. Cloudflare, some video player API - companies that would cooperate with authorities. The thing is good luck suing some Russian who's putting up the feed. These companies are going to go after the individual users - the john's.

              Comment

              • richardt
                Undisputed Champion
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Nov 2007
                • 22045
                • 2,594
                • 201
                • 77,067

                #17
                Originally posted by rmorris003
                Does this site have a list of names? If not then why would you admit to stealing it? Also for people watching on IPTV they can't go after anyone but the providers who provided the stream.
                A copyright infringement lawyer said: "It would be in the nature of listening to a band cover a song when they don't have a license to publicly perform it. The band might have committed copyright infringement, but the audience did not."

                Anyone can come across a page and see something streaming, even someone who is challenged and is not sure how the video is being shown - so it is a long stretch that someone wandering across a video, such as a child or a challenged person could even be identified, let alone sued. Everything I've read is that there are no cases of viewers being sued. And only a few who provided the streams which is what their target would be.

                Comment

                • QballLobo
                  Undisputed Champion
                  • Nov 2011
                  • 7137
                  • 1,304
                  • 112
                  • 48,002

                  #18
                  I don’t remember any fights. I remember a Justin Bieber and Snoop Dog concert.

                  Comment

                  • TheBoxGod
                    I Am Inevitable
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Oct 2020
                    • 1704
                    • 190
                    • 126
                    • 41,042

                    #19
                    Originally posted by aaronbnb

                    Signal is an engineering marvel with its own systems. They also get white privilege since it's Silicon Valley backed. The feds aren't bashing that CEO's front door in.

                    The piracy sites are thrown together and use commercial big tech i.e. Cloudflare, some video player API - companies that would cooperate with authorities. The thing is good luck suing some Russian who's putting up the feed. These companies are going to go after the individual users - the john's.
                    I dont think any "white privliedge" comes into play here, they either have the data or they dont and in signal case they dont, and in quality vpns providers they wont be able to produce teh data either due to the same encryption and no logs polics Yea, im sure they will get alot of "johns", those taht didnt use a vpn and those who used cheap US based vpn service but the ones who actually used a quality vpn service such as protonvpn for example have nothing to worry about (if triller threats were even true but .... they arent.)
                    Last edited by TheBoxGod; 05-03-2021, 08:31 PM.

                    Comment

                    • jmrf4435
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Jun 2014
                      • 8397
                      • 772
                      • 14
                      • 66,112

                      #20
                      Originally posted by aaronbnb

                      Signal is an engineering marvel with its own systems. They also get white privilege since it's Silicon Valley backed. The feds aren't bashing that CEO's front door in.

                      The piracy sites are thrown together and use commercial big tech i.e. Cloudflare, some video player API - companies that would cooperate with authorities. The thing is good luck suing some Russian who's putting up the feed. These companies are going to go after the individual users - the john's.
                      "they also get white privilege since it's silicon valley based" lol

                      The dumbest **** i've heard in a while lol

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP