lmfao if Arum/Haymon/Oscar couldn't do **** about pirates, you think Triller can?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Triller Offers Amnesty Through June 1st To Offenders Targeted in April 17 Piracy Lawsuit
Collapse
-
Does this site have a list of names? If not then why would you admit to stealing it? Also for people watching on IPTV they can't go after anyone but the providers who provided the stream.
Comment
-
Originally posted by TheBoxGod View Post
This is a scare tactic to squeeze out any extra dollars they can.
Personally, I find it disrespectful as all hell for a ***** ass commentator to mock a fighter who's been knocked out.Butt stuff likes this.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Network monitoring has come a long way. The surveillance tech exists to back up Triller and UFC's threats. It's more than IP address, they know the device now and can reverse engineer from there.
I'd be careful streaming. Times are changing.
Comment
-
Originally posted by TheBoxGod View Post“VPN firewalls all have to comply and turn over the actual IP addresses of each person who stole the fight in discovery,”
No they dont, most VPN have strict no log policy and end to end encryption so their isn't anything to hand over besides timestamps and random #'s that represent accounts but arent linked to any identifyably data. Take a look at Signal messenger who just been supeoned again for the 2nd time and they legally told the U.S. to chill we aint got no data cause they keep no logs aswell.
https://signal.org/bigbrother/centra...ia-grand-jury/
The piracy sites are thrown together and use commercial big tech i.e. Cloudflare, some video player API - companies that would cooperate with authorities. The thing is good luck suing some Russian who's putting up the feed. These companies are going to go after the individual users - the john's.
Comment
-
Originally posted by rmorris003 View PostDoes this site have a list of names? If not then why would you admit to stealing it? Also for people watching on IPTV they can't go after anyone but the providers who provided the stream.
Anyone can come across a page and see something streaming, even someone who is challenged and is not sure how the video is being shown - so it is a long stretch that someone wandering across a video, such as a child or a challenged person could even be identified, let alone sued. Everything I've read is that there are no cases of viewers being sued. And only a few who provided the streams which is what their target would be.
Comment
-
Originally posted by aaronbnb View Post
Signal is an engineering marvel with its own systems. They also get white privilege since it's Silicon Valley backed. The feds aren't bashing that CEO's front door in.
The piracy sites are thrown together and use commercial big tech i.e. Cloudflare, some video player API - companies that would cooperate with authorities. The thing is good luck suing some Russian who's putting up the feed. These companies are going to go after the individual users - the john's.Last edited by TheBoxGod; 05-03-2021, 08:31 PM.Butt stuff likes this.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by aaronbnb View Post
Signal is an engineering marvel with its own systems. They also get white privilege since it's Silicon Valley backed. The feds aren't bashing that CEO's front door in.
The piracy sites are thrown together and use commercial big tech i.e. Cloudflare, some video player API - companies that would cooperate with authorities. The thing is good luck suing some Russian who's putting up the feed. These companies are going to go after the individual users - the john's.
The dumbest **** i've heard in a while lolAjvar Butt stuff like this.
- Likes 2
Comment
Comment