Originally posted by GRUSTLER
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
De La Hoya: "The Pressure is On Floyd Mayweather Jr"
Collapse
-
Originally posted by daggum View Postremember when zab lost to baldomir? kinda killed that fight..........oh wait........he fought him anyway! then he fought baldomir cause if baldomir beat judah he must be a good fighter right? wrong! as proved in subsequent fights beating judah is really no hard task at all as clottey and cotto proved and the same can be said of baldomir who lost to jackson bonsu and vernon forrest.
between Zab/Floyd was a must because everyone wanted to
see it because people kept saying that he was the only one
that could beat Floyd. PLUS, no one even thought that Zab
would lose but when he did, Floyd and Zab peoples reworked
the contract and Zab took less $ AND Zab still had a title.
Zab was still a bigger name than Cotto/Margarito/Williams/Clottey
at the time.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by daggum View Postwell judah and baldomir aren't the best no matter how many belts or linear poopages they had. as you can see when cotto and clottey both beat judah up in subsequent fights. obv baldomir would be destroyed by anyone with a pulse as well.
its equivalent to berto getting 3 belts and the linear championship by beating hlatshwayo and mickey rodriguez. he would have the glitter but he wouldn't have the respect.
its not Mayweathers fault at how the WW Belts exchanged hands...Forest had them...then Mayorga took them..Spinks took them from Mayorga....Zab took them from Spinks.....Baldo took them from Zab.....
Mayweather beat Zab & Baldo
Man Clottey & Cotto werent even big names at the Time Mayweather was fighting at WW....Cotto was fighting Malignaggi that year @ 140...lol....so why would he fight Cotto to prove he was the best?...LMAO!!!
get ur facts straight
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dynamite Kid View PostEverything you say is correct but thats all in theory.
I believe Manny Pacquiao's unorthodoxy is what makes him so difficult to handle, plus his speed of hand and foot of coarse.
There is no knowing how Mayweather will cope with Manny's unorthodoxy and left handed stance until they actually get in the ring together, thats why upsets happen in Boxing, because you cant calculate how someone is going to handle what the other guy brings untill they have been in the ring together.
Who would of picked Mayorga to knock Forrest silly ? its not the straightest of right hands he threw so you would expect a quality fighter like Forrest to be able to avoid it.
Also if Pacquiao's was so one dimmensional back in the day, how come no one could get out of the way of his left hand when they knew it was coming ? because its like i said you dont know how someone will deal with a fighters rhythm until they actually fight.
I did not expect Mayweather to have any trouble with Sosa and whilst he was dominent he certainly did not look comfortable getting to grips with Soso's akward rhythm. I aslo did not expect Castillo to give Mayweather the trouble he did.
Look id make Floyd a favourite but you should not act like its a stick on win because he is technically better, if Manny were more orthodox then i would agree but........
I agree, anything can happen in a fight.....but why are we talkin about Mayeather dealing with Manny? We should be talkin about how Manny is gonna deal with Floyd
Comment
-
Originally posted by GRUSTLER View PostMan, you'll try to find every angle to prove a point. The fight
between Zab/Floyd was a must because everyone wanted to
see it because people kept saying that he was the only one
that could beat Floyd. PLUS, no one even thought that Zab
would lose but when he did, Floyd and Zab peoples reworked
the contract and Zab took less $ AND Zab still had a title.
Zab was still a bigger name than Cotto/Margarito/Williams/Clottey
at the time.
ok answer me this. if berto has 3 titles but he won them by fighting mickey rodriguez, hlatschwayo and michael jennings does this make him the best?. should you fight cotto and mosley or berto cause he has all the titles and people call him the best?
Comment
-
Originally posted by daggum View Postremember when zab lost to baldomir? kinda killed that fight..........oh wait........he fought him anyway! then he fought baldomir cause if baldomir beat judah he must be a good fighter right? wrong! as proved in subsequent fights beating judah is really no hard task at all as clottey and cotto proved and the same can be said of baldomir who lost to jackson bonsu and vernon forrest.
you dismiss Mayweather fighting Baldo & Zab but you dont make any valid reasons why he shouldve fought Margo or Cotto?
Comment
-
Originally posted by daggum View Postpeople said lacy was the next tyson.
ok answer me this. if berto has 3 titles but he won them by fighting mickey rodriguez, hlatschwayo and michael jennings does this make him the best?. should you fight cotto and mosley or berto cause he has all the titles and people call him the best?
what does Berto winning titles from those dudes have to do with mayweather winning his titles from the UNDISPUTED WW champ?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jiddu Dali View Postits not Mayweathers fault at how the WW Belts exchanged hands...Forest had them...then Mayorga took them..Spinks took them from Mayorga....Zab took them from Spinks.....Baldo took them from Zab.....
Mayweather beat Zab & Baldo
Man Clottey & Cotto werent even big names at the Time Mayweather was fighting at WW....Cotto was fighting Malignaggi that year @ 140...lol....so why would he fight Cotto to prove he was the best?...LMAO!!!
get ur facts straight
now he's coming back which is cool cause i like watching him fight but he's being ridiculous fighting marquez. he already had his last fight against a small dude. cotto was the best challenger before floyd retired and he fought hatton instead. now mosley, cotto, and pac are the best and he's doing it all over again fighting marquez. seems like he's playing his fans for fools.
Comment
Comment