Statement win for Boots considering that Lipinets is better than Danny Garcia

[Marchegiano]

Struggling to take this thread seriously.


Triangle theory around one name?

[Mammoth]

Wait, does that also mean Matthysse > Danny Garcia and Lipinets?

[Rip Chudd]

Guerrero, Granados and Redkach are not better than Lamont Peterson.

While I didn't say they were, at 147 Guerrero has done more than Peterson. I mean at least have some form of an argument aside from bias bro. This is silly

[ShaneMosleySr]

Peterson’s win over David Avaneysan is more impressive than anything Robert Guerrero did at 147.

While I didn't say they were, at 147 Guerrero has done more than Peterson. I mean at least have some form of an argument aside from bias bro. This is silly

[Rip Chudd]

Peterson’s win over David Avaneysan is more impressive than anything Robert Guerrero did at 147.

surely you jest. You mean the same guy who was stopped by Kavauliskas or however you spell his name. Ok buddy

[JakeTheBoxer]

surely you jest. You mean the same guy who was stopped by Kavauliskas or however you spell his name. Ok buddy

Kavaliauskas is not bad at all.

[Brother Mouzone]

200.gif
............

[ShaneMosleySr]

He’s awful because he lost to Terence Crawford.

The guy who’s done nothing at welterweight but Danny Garcia has lol.

Kavaliauskas is not bad at all.

[kushking]

Lol you’ve decided I’m a huge Sergey Lipinets fan?

I think he sucks, much like Danny Garcia.

This isn't about either of the 2,but you're using it to make Boots win seem more impressive (which isn't necessary everyone knows Boots is already a great up & comer)

[Rip Chudd]

Kavaliauskas is not bad at all.

He's not too bad eye test wise, but he hasn't beaten anyone at WW to prove his worth. So he's gassing up guys who have been knocked out by other unproven fighters. His bias is clear