Fury probably wins but it could well have been a good fight back then. Definitely would have been a big fight for the UK audience, shame we missed out on it.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Haye Believes He Would Have Beaten Fury Had Their Fight Come Off in 2013
Collapse
-
Originally posted by Grocery Stick View PostInstead Haymaker went on to get knocked out by Tony Bellew...Twice! At least no animals were harmed during the course of his training camps.
And Haye had every chance of beating Fury, he was fast and explosive and more than capable of putting Fury’s lights out. It would still be Fury’s 2nd or 3rd best win today had he beaten Haye.
As for pulling out of fights, how many has Fury pulled out of? The guy has never defended a belt yet...Last edited by NorvernRob; 04-06-2021, 02:56 AM.
Comment
-
He might not have even beaten Hughie Fury. Haye was an opportunist looking for a cash out back in 2013 IMO. Bellew played him at his own game.
Comment
-
Haye would have sparked Fury. Fury was getting dropped by the likes of Pajkic and Cunningham at that time.
Comment
-
This event, changed the entire trajectory of heavyweight history 'Because Fury would of ended right there'.
Only Tyson Fury & David Haye are the only fighters that Wladimir Kiltschko found it difficult to land on 'And Haye went up against a peak Kiltschko, who wanted to fight' People look over these points.
Fury is not landing on this version of Haye at will 'And when he gets all clumsy, stands square on he will be sparked out'.
There are three versions of Tyson Fury 'The Riddler, Clumsy Kid and Kronk Fury'.
I just don't think you can be a clumsy kid against David Haye.
I am not stating this will be a 100% easy fight for David Haye, but his speed, defense and offensive abilities I think would just catch Fury out at some point in the fight.
Comment
-
Comment