Isn’t amazing that Canelo and Fury represent the NEW AGE slickness in boxing?!

[Thuglife Nelo]

Fury and Canelo have styles that are entertaining to the fans and bring it to their challengers! They don’t need to flee the situation as if it was purely about scoring techniques in the amateurs. Both Canelo and Fury are in the FIGHT to test their opponents intestinal fortitude.

what a great time we’re in.

[KingOfGlory]

I hate Canelo's A-Side bullying in negotiations but he's really making a career of it fighting the best at 168 and squeezing in 3-4 fights a year.

Fury needs to fight more often too. He's wasting his prime years away. Again.

[abracada]

Dc73js.gif

[abracada]

VIl.gif

[KingGilgamesh]

Fury still lacks consistency but Canelo is genuinely a joy to watch. Mexican/American boxing still seems to be primarily about pugilism and hence why I think they end up producing more entertaining fighters...especially if you actually care to watch boxing over simple brawling.

[deathofaclown]

Fury still lacks consistency but Canelo is genuinely a joy to watch. Mexican/American boxing still seems to be primarily about pugilism and hence why I think they end up producing more entertaining fighters...especially if you actually care to watch boxing over simple brawling.

The biggest fault of Fury is he fights to the level of his opposition when he doesn’t rate them. But actually Fury has won his biggest fights with no controversy v Wlad and Wilder.

Canelo is more steady and consistent regardless of opposition which is to be admired but it could be said he lost his two biggest anticipated fights. Well he did lose to Floyd ...and pretty much everyone apart from a few Canelo fans agree he lost the first GGG fight.

so it really depends which way you look at it.

I enjoy watching both fight anyway. Fury in the second Wilder fight was one of the best heavyweight displays in many years.

Canelo is always good to watch, because you can see his constant training and practice making him better all the time.

[4truth]

Canelo’s style isn’t one I would describe as “slick” and I mean that more as complement than criticism.

[1hourRun]

Tyson, is a true trailer-blazer ; only mma refs that are trained in the martial-arts of Gypsy bare-knuckle street-fighting can detect such insidious crookery. Kenny Bayless, Tony Weeks, Robert Byrd, Russell Mora are simply clueless to tha 'slickness'.

[ReggieKray]

I agree sand in the pocket sickness is better than ride my bike sickness. Floyd was stand in the pocket sickness.

[KingGilgamesh]

The biggest fault of Fury is he fights to the level of his opposition when he doesn’t rate them. But actually Fury has won his biggest fights with no controversy v Wlad and Wilder.

Canelo is more steady and consistent regardless of opposition which is to be admired but it could be said he lost his two biggest anticipated fights. Well he did lose to Floyd ...and pretty much everyone apart from a few Canelo fans agree he lost the first GGG fight.

so it really depends which way you look at it.

I enjoy watching both fight anyway. Fury in the second Wilder fight was one of the best heavyweight displays in many years.

Canelo is always good to watch, because you can see his constant training and practice making him better all the time.

Furys fight against Wilder was arguably the best display by a British boxer on US soil. However that doesn't stop Fury from being inconsistent and constantly fighting garbage competition.