$50 is not bad but still could've been a good Free Fox Event but I get it, PPV is just extra money on top of whatever it is they're guaranteed so fighters are pushing for PPV. Shawn Porter broke this down on how he PUSHED for PPV with Spence and they was indeed going to do it on FOX for Free originally. It comes down to networks, if we want all this stuff for Free then it is going to take a Network to really commit to boxing and offer a HUGE BUDGET and boxing is not popular enough for that to ever happen so MORE PPV's are coming regardless if it is on Triller, Fite TV,Fanmio or whatever
Comments Thread For: Andy Ruiz vs. Chris Arreola - Fox Sports PPV Officially Announced, May 1
Collapse
-
always been a pro pbc guy.....but this being ppv is a head scratcher....hey, haymon is successful in this business...its his call i guess...makes very little sense but whatever
i guess hes just playing on the mexican fanbase hereComment
-
He might have a contracted number of annual PPV's to give FoxComment
-
Coming off losses doesn't prevent a fight from being on PPV. For example, both Joshua and Wilder can be coming off losses, but that is a PPV fight regardless. But this one right here has no business being on PPV. They could be coming off multiple wins in a row and this is regular FOX fight. Nothing more, nothing less.Comment
-
I would have considered $19.99 because i spend that on a burger & beer at the bar but if it is $49.95? F*** Off! I always liked Arreola & don’t mind Ruiz but not paying $50 because I don’t watch any divisions other than HW. No interest in catch weights & weight drained BS... i would have been happier with a couple other HW fights then maybe they would get my money.Comment
-
Comment