I don't even call it a tuneup, it's going to be an exhibition. A tuneup would be against a threat, somebody that will test you but, you're most surely gonna be able to come out on top. A tuneup fight for May would be like him vs: Collazo, Hlatschwhatever, Quintana, Urango, Torres, somebody along those lines would've served as a better tuneup.
Why don't we call the Floyd-Marquez fight what it really is?
Collapse
-
-
-
Comment
-
[QUOTE=mangler;5947966]I've **** on Pac-Cotto equally. Why? The catchweights. Fighters dominate their divisions or outgrow em, they move. Common practice. No beef wit that. But if you ain't outgrown your present division, fuck a halfassed move up. Go all the way or not at all. Why ain't these full fledged 147 lb fights? Cuz the lil guys can't be effective there. By demandin catchweights, they admit that physically, it's man against boy. In that case, the WW's prove jack **** by beatin em. Get off my nuts foo.[/QUOTE]
You would need nuts for me to get on. You have no nuts "foo". And you have never **** on Cotto-Pacquio in the way you do Mayweather-Marquez so don't stoop to lying.Comment
-
[QUOTE=joseph5620;5948428]You obviously can't read then. And like I said, get off my nuts foo.I've **** on Pac-Cotto equally. Why? The catchweights. Fighters dominate their divisions or outgrow em, they move. Common practice. No beef wit that. But if you ain't outgrown your present division, fuck a halfassed move up. Go all the way or not at all. Why ain't these full fledged 147 lb fights? Cuz the lil guys can't be effective there. By demandin catchweights, they admit that physically, it's man against boy. In that case, the WW's prove jack **** by beatin em. Get off my nuts foo.[/QUOTE]
You would need nuts for me to get on. You have no nuts "foo". And you have never **** on Cotto-Pacquio in the way you do Mayweather-Marquez so don't stoop to lying.Comment
-
Pac beatin DLH did not prove he can handle an elite WW. Cotto should KO him and will look awful if he doesn't. JMM had his bluff called, and he's too much of a beast to back down. But this fight is bull**** Dap. As a member of the Cartel, I'm surprised you endorse this garbage. JMM deserves better than bein a cherrypicker's scapegoat my ******.
Another ****** comment by you. Marquez wanted the fight, is getting his biggest payday and opportunity. And you're talking about how he "deserves better". Sheer ignorance.Last edited by joseph5620; 08-24-2009, 03:43 PM.Comment
-
Comment
-
Look we have a counter pucher whos 36 years old whos going to try and be the agressor.And We have a 32 year old defensive counter puncher with reflexes like hell whos fighting someone coming up from 135.Comment
-
[QUOTE=joseph5620;5948466]JMM had his bluff called. I addressed this already. He called out Mr boat buyer to spite Pac. Nobody, includin JMM himself was expectin Mr boat buyer to come runnin outta retirement to fight him. But he was called, the WW demand was placed on him, and he got too much heart to back down. Now 1 more time, get off my nuts foo.
Comment
-
[QUOTE=mangler;5948489]And that still doesnt explain your now typically ignorant comments about how he "deserves better". That's comical. Get off JMM's nuts and grow a pair of your own.
JMM had his bluff called. I addressed this already. He called out Mr boat buyer to spite Pac. Nobody, includin JMM himself was expectin Mr boat buyer to come runnin outta retirement to fight him. But he was called, the WW demand was placed on him, and he got too much heart to back down. Now 1 more time, get off my nuts foo.
Comment


Comment