Houston, We’ve Got A Problem With Your Scoring
Collapse
-
agreed...word for word. I'm not a fan of either boxer, but Paulie called it even before the fight, he was weight drained, small ring, and very biased judges. He knew he was going to get robbed even before they fought. I loved his rant at the end. So true. Never did like Texas, where they executed over 150 people, including a ******ed man....more than the rest of the US combined.
I will also boycott Texas boxing. I'm not buying floyds fight if it's in texas.
Peace, and good luck in your bet with the other guy.Comment
-
Malignaggi should change his nickname to "Natradaumus" because he called it exactly how it went down days prior before the fight.
A horrible, horrible decision. Friends of mine who don't follow Boxing heavily watched and were in awe with the decision. The **** stinks...Comment
-
I wonder if this sheds a little bit of light on Pacquiao's victory over Hatton being less significant than JMM's victory over Diaz in terms of danger. I'm saying that as a huge JMM fan, because I know Hatton cut through Paulie like butter even though it took him a while to stop him. Hatton has always been blessed with the ability to quickly move his feet around the ring. That is something that Diaz lacks. So I think that could have to do with styles.Comment
-
I wonder if this sheds a little bit of light on Pacquiao's victory over Hatton being less significant than JMM's victory over Diaz in terms of danger. I'm saying that as a huge JMM fan, because I know Hatton cut through Paulie like butter even though it took him a while to stop him. Hatton has always been blessed with the ability to quickly move his feet around the ring. That is something that Diaz lacks. So I think that could have to do with styles.
pac destroys hatton who beat malignaggi; while diaz struggles against malignaggi, and you think pac/hatton < diaz/paulie????Comment
-
Dude, you must have not read my post at all. I'm actually implying that the Hatton victory for Pacquiao looks better than JMM's victory over Diaz even though I used to think it was close. People just down talk on Pacquiao for not fighting Diaz, when his unimpressive performance over Malinaggi kind of justifies that.Comment
-
Dude, you must have not read my post at all. I'm actually implying that the Hatton victory for Pacquiao looks better than JMM's victory over Diaz even though I used to think it was close. People just down talk on Pacquiao for not fighting Diaz, when his unimpressive performance over Malinaggi kind of justifies that.
and I also think Malignaggi won the fight.
Diaz-Marquez is diminished a bit in my eyes as a result of this lackluster performance, it might not be my FOTY anymoreComment
-
I had it 115-113 malignaggi.bad referee & pathetic judging.Diaz at best gets a draw.I had it 3-3 after 6 & 4-3 Diaz after 7 but paulie won 8,9,10,11 & I gave Diaz 12...teddy atlas' scoring meter looks better all the time.I can't wait to hear what he thinks.Comment
-
It does not take away from how exciting the fight between Diaz and JMM was, it just makes JMM's victory over him look a little bit suspect. I think Malinaggi was the worst kind of fighter that Golden Boy could've matched Diaz up with. I know they viewed him as an easy mark because Hatton worked him over, but if you can't cut off the ring against him you are not going to look good against him whether you win or not. I can understand why Diaz did not fight Guzman. Oh my god, what a boxing clinic that would've been. I've suggested all along that Golden Boy should've put Diaz in with Funeka because Funeka comes to bring it and does not move around. This fight has just hurt Diaz's standing big time. Even more so than his losses to JMM and Campell.Comment
-
Diaz has no power & it kills him when he has stepped up & now he gets a hometown decision like this...his stock has dropped faster than a hookers dress! I bet hbo will drop him.Comment
Comment