Houston, We’ve Got A Problem With Your Scoring

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • boricuarn
    Contender
    • Feb 2008
    • 345
    • 16
    • 0
    • 6,606

    #71
    Originally posted by UncleSam
    stfu this has nothing to do with texas or houston as a city or state..
    this is GBP bull****
    By the way, make sure you correct my name, should be BORICUARN. I want to get the 1,000 points, do not send the points to a wrong person.
    Peace.

    Comment

    • boricuarn
      Contender
      • Feb 2008
      • 345
      • 16
      • 0
      • 6,606

      #72
      Originally posted by jazluvr449
      agreed...word for word. I'm not a fan of either boxer, but Paulie called it even before the fight, he was weight drained, small ring, and very biased judges. He knew he was going to get robbed even before they fought. I loved his rant at the end. So true. Never did like Texas, where they executed over 150 people, including a ******ed man....more than the rest of the US combined.
      I will also boycott Texas boxing. I'm not buying floyds fight if it's in texas.
      I see you are a Cotto fan like me. I am Puerto Rican and getting ready to go to Las Vegas to see this fight. It is very fun betting points over here, but already I have $250 bet in my job, also I will bet $500 in Las Vegas, I hope they make Cotto the underdog, so I can collect good money.
      Peace, and good luck in your bet with the other guy.

      Comment

      • Ravishing
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Apr 2009
        • 4798
        • 181
        • 47
        • 11,175

        #73
        Malignaggi should change his nickname to "Natradaumus" because he called it exactly how it went down days prior before the fight.

        A horrible, horrible decision. Friends of mine who don't follow Boxing heavily watched and were in awe with the decision. The **** stinks...

        Comment

        • Iceta
          Undisputed Champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • May 2009
          • 6751
          • 111
          • 205
          • 13,490

          #74
          I wonder if this sheds a little bit of light on Pacquiao's victory over Hatton being less significant than JMM's victory over Diaz in terms of danger. I'm saying that as a huge JMM fan, because I know Hatton cut through Paulie like butter even though it took him a while to stop him. Hatton has always been blessed with the ability to quickly move his feet around the ring. That is something that Diaz lacks. So I think that could have to do with styles.

          Comment

          • Pullcounter
            no guts no glory
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Jan 2004
            • 42582
            • 549
            • 191
            • 49,739

            #75
            Originally posted by Iceta
            I wonder if this sheds a little bit of light on Pacquiao's victory over Hatton being less significant than JMM's victory over Diaz in terms of danger. I'm saying that as a huge JMM fan, because I know Hatton cut through Paulie like butter even though it took him a while to stop him. Hatton has always been blessed with the ability to quickly move his feet around the ring. That is something that Diaz lacks. So I think that could have to do with styles.
            wait... what?

            pac destroys hatton who beat malignaggi; while diaz struggles against malignaggi, and you think pac/hatton < diaz/paulie????

            Comment

            • Iceta
              Undisputed Champion
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • May 2009
              • 6751
              • 111
              • 205
              • 13,490

              #76
              Originally posted by Pullcounter
              wait... what?

              pac destroys hatton who beat malignaggi; while diaz struggles against malignaggi, and you think pac/hatton < diaz/paulie????
              Dude, you must have not read my post at all. I'm actually implying that the Hatton victory for Pacquiao looks better than JMM's victory over Diaz even though I used to think it was close. People just down talk on Pacquiao for not fighting Diaz, when his unimpressive performance over Malinaggi kind of justifies that.

              Comment

              • sylvestersweet
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Feb 2008
                • 1791
                • 46
                • 67
                • 8,114

                #77
                Originally posted by Iceta
                Dude, you must have not read my post at all. I'm actually implying that the Hatton victory for Pacquiao looks better than JMM's victory over Diaz even though I used to think it was close. People just down talk on Pacquiao for not fighting Diaz, when his unimpressive performance over Malinaggi kind of justifies that.
                very true
                and I also think Malignaggi won the fight.
                Diaz-Marquez is diminished a bit in my eyes as a result of this lackluster performance, it might not be my FOTY anymore

                Comment

                • joe strong
                  Average Joe
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Jan 2009
                  • 17793
                  • 1,759
                  • 835
                  • 58,015

                  #78
                  I had it 115-113 malignaggi.bad referee & pathetic judging.Diaz at best gets a draw.I had it 3-3 after 6 & 4-3 Diaz after 7 but paulie won 8,9,10,11 & I gave Diaz 12...teddy atlas' scoring meter looks better all the time.I can't wait to hear what he thinks.

                  Comment

                  • Iceta
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • May 2009
                    • 6751
                    • 111
                    • 205
                    • 13,490

                    #79
                    Originally posted by sylvestersweet
                    very true
                    and I also think Malignaggi won the fight.
                    Diaz-Marquez is diminished a bit in my eyes as a result of this lackluster performance, it might not be my FOTY anymore
                    It does not take away from how exciting the fight between Diaz and JMM was, it just makes JMM's victory over him look a little bit suspect. I think Malinaggi was the worst kind of fighter that Golden Boy could've matched Diaz up with. I know they viewed him as an easy mark because Hatton worked him over, but if you can't cut off the ring against him you are not going to look good against him whether you win or not. I can understand why Diaz did not fight Guzman. Oh my god, what a boxing clinic that would've been. I've suggested all along that Golden Boy should've put Diaz in with Funeka because Funeka comes to bring it and does not move around. This fight has just hurt Diaz's standing big time. Even more so than his losses to JMM and Campell.

                    Comment

                    • joe strong
                      Average Joe
                      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                      • Jan 2009
                      • 17793
                      • 1,759
                      • 835
                      • 58,015

                      #80
                      Diaz has no power & it kills him when he has stepped up & now he gets a hometown decision like this...his stock has dropped faster than a hookers dress! I bet hbo will drop him.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP