The Haye vs. Wlad contract..............WAS IT FAIR?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Burner
    Banned
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Mar 2008
    • 9090
    • 346
    • 51
    • 9,623

    #1

    The Haye vs. Wlad contract..............WAS IT FAIR?

    If Haye loses HAYE gets NO rematch.

    If Haye wins he has to fight Klitschko again.........and if Klit loses again he gets another rematch.

    Then after that he has to figth Vitali and the same applies.


    I cant wait til the KLITS are retired and out of boxing..this contract was a disgrace.
    40
    Yes
    45.00%
    18
    No
    55.00%
    22
  • True Guru
    Banned
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Jun 2009
    • 1648
    • 138
    • 0
    • 1,845

    #2
    He signed it though,so he either didnt mind like his fanboys do or hes an absolute idiot.
    Your choice?

    Comment

    • DavidHaye
      Banned
      • Jun 2009
      • 162
      • 47
      • 3
      • 206

      #3
      FFS im bored of these threads, no it was not fair, but Haye fans say no the Klit bum lovers say yes. Then we go over same **** like we have on last 200 thread started.

      No shock to see EM posting on a Haye vs Klit thread though

      Comment

      • True Guru
        Banned
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Jun 2009
        • 1648
        • 138
        • 0
        • 1,845

        #4
        Originally posted by DavidHaye
        No shock to see EM posting on a Haye vs Klit thread though
        Nor yourself David

        Comment

        • Burner
          Banned
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Mar 2008
          • 9090
          • 346
          • 51
          • 9,623

          #5
          Originally posted by elephant man
          He signed it though,so he either didnt mind like his fanboys do or hes an absolute idiot.
          Your choice?
          Um again I ask do you think the contract was fair yes or no?

          Comment

          • True Guru
            Banned
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Jun 2009
            • 1648
            • 138
            • 0
            • 1,845

            #6
            Originally posted by Burner, ATG
            Um again I ask do you think the contract was fair yes or no?
            Yes,no matter if the Klits wanted to tie him to 2 fights,3 fights,10 fights, the fact is they all would have been Hayes HIGHEST ever purses and made him extremely wealthy.
            You mention that if haye loses he gets no rematch,well why the hell should he?
            Should Chagaev get a rematch,or Tony Thompson?Hayes nothing in the division when he got beat down he wouldnt get a rematch,no one would.
            Haye has said himself numerous times that he wants to unify the division,he said he would easily defeat both Klitschkos,he would knock both of them out,well he got his chance twice and ducked both times.
            Hes not a mando to Wlad,he isnt a mando to Vitali,hes also been talking **** about both for months,if I was either bro I too would look to screw him in anyway I could,wouldnt you?
            Last edited by True Guru; 08-14-2009, 07:03 AM.

            Comment

            • Pugilistic™
              MV3
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Nov 2006
              • 9848
              • 324
              • 305
              • 16,773

              #7
              I like both Klitschkos but i found the contract deal a bit of a joke.

              Comment

              • BattlingNelson
                Mod a Phukka
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Mar 2008
                • 29881
                • 3,255
                • 3,200
                • 286,536

                #8
                Who knows? All the details hasn't been made public. What we do know is that Haye signed, so he must have thought it was allright.

                Comment

                • zojo
                  Banned
                  • Feb 2009
                  • 393
                  • 71
                  • 61
                  • 499

                  #9
                  why didn't "the nipple" get the same ****** contract?

                  Comment

                  • kayjay
                    A ***** and I'm happy
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • Jan 2006
                    • 13652
                    • 1,813
                    • 5,770
                    • 30,799

                    #10
                    When does a challenger ever get a rematch? That's a ****** idea.

                    In context it was perfectly fair: Haye was not a top ranked challenger and so didn't deserve a shot. From that position he could only expect unfavorable contractual terms.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP