Most Overrated Fights

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • rskumm21
    Banned
    • Dec 2008
    • 2640
    • 199
    • 175
    • 3,033

    #21
    Originally posted by Pullcounter
    i thought tito/oscar was a dud and way overhyped for what transpired.
    Overrated and overhyped are two different things.

    Comment

    • bojangles1987
      bo jungle
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Jul 2009
      • 41118
      • 1,326
      • 357
      • 63,028

      #22
      Originally posted by TredKiller
      i know ill get some heat for this but, thrilla in manilla is really not as entertaining as its made out to be
      I STRONGLY disagree. Great fight fought in three brutal acts, I am always entertained.

      Comment

      • Thread Stealer
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Sep 2007
        • 9657
        • 439
        • 102
        • 17,804

        #23
        I don't know how fights like Jones-Hopkins and Trinidad-De La Hoya are overrated...everyone says those fights suck and that Tito-DLH was one of the biggest letdowns ever.

        Comment

        • Sick/
          Banned
          • Feb 2009
          • 11284
          • 554
          • 866
          • 14,892

          #24
          Originally posted by DreamSparkz
          Maybe Froch v Taylor.

          Only the last rounds where Froch was pulling through were exciting.
          I thought that was a great fight.

          Comment

          • StarshipTrooper
            Anti-Fascist, Anti-Bigot
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Mar 2007
            • 17917
            • 1,180
            • 1,344
            • 26,849

            #25
            Originally posted by TredKiller
            i know ill get some heat for this but, thrilla in manilla is really not as entertaining as its made out to be
            Okay, I'll bite: How come? I've watched many many fights over the years and that one consistantly makes my top-10 at worst, top-five most of the time.

            Poet

            Comment

            • Guest
              • 0
              • 0
              • 0

              #26
              I honestly didn't think Leonard-Hagler was that great, and that's probably sacrilege in the boxing world.

              Comment

              • StarshipTrooper
                Anti-Fascist, Anti-Bigot
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Mar 2007
                • 17917
                • 1,180
                • 1,344
                • 26,849

                #27
                Originally posted by Thread Stealer
                Evander Holyfield-Mike Tyson 1: Somehow, this good fight, great event, won 1996 Fight of the Year by The Ring over much more exciting action fights like Marco Antonio-Barrera-Kennedy McKinney, Arturo Gatti-Wilson Rodriguez, Rid**** Bowe-Andrew Golota 2, Tim Littles-Frankie Liles 2, and Kevin Kelley-Derrick Gainer 1. The action was pretty good but not great, with all the holding. Barrera-McKinney was light years better.
                You have to remember in boxing the Heavyweights (rightly or wrongly) are going to get top billing. Bowe - Golata II wasn't going to get it as it was a sloppy fight that ended in a DQ.

                Originally posted by Thread Stealer
                Oscar De La Hoya-Ike Quartey: 2 very exciting rounds, 10 chessmatch rounds with ocassional action. Of course years later people remember it as some kind of great fight, remembering rounds 6 and 12 and not rounds 1 through 5, and 7 through 11.
                Chessmatches can be great fights too, not just brawls. There's much more to boxing than just wild punch-outs and violent KOs.

                Poet

                Comment

                • StarshipTrooper
                  Anti-Fascist, Anti-Bigot
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Mar 2007
                  • 17917
                  • 1,180
                  • 1,344
                  • 26,849

                  #28
                  Originally posted by jreckoning
                  I honestly didn't think Leonard-Hagler was that great, and that's probably sacrilege in the boxing world.
                  No, I think most knowledgable posters agree that was a mediocre fight.

                  Poet

                  Comment

                  • Thread Stealer
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Sep 2007
                    • 9657
                    • 439
                    • 102
                    • 17,804

                    #29
                    Originally posted by poet682006
                    Chessmatches can be great fights too, not just brawls. There's much more to boxing than just wild punch-outs and violent KOs.

                    Poet
                    But Quartey-DLH had way too much posing and not enough punching. Actually, calling it a chess-match might be nice. A chessmatch usually would imply both guys carefully planning every move and trying to set traps, a mistake resulting in big payment (like a big punch landing). Quartey-DLH seemed to feature just a lot of posing and staring rather than this sort of high-skilled chessmatch.

                    A fight like Toney-McCallum 1 is a high-paced chessmatch, with both guys throwing a lot of hard shots but not just aimlessly.

                    Comment

                    • Guest
                      • 0
                      • 0
                      • 0

                      #30
                      Originally posted by poet682006
                      No, I think most knowledgable posters agree that was a mediocre fight.

                      Poet
                      Yeah some would but it was one of those FOTY's (Ring Magazine, etc) because it was an event more than anything else.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP